issue87 有感于87井喷现象~

boyjimUID: 125249

87"In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
正文-----------------
1定义beginner
2很多年轻专家有新发现-但是他们不是beginner
3但是很多人认为年轻专家就是beginner
4现在begnner能获得成功的机会已经很少了~例子都是死掉的人
In the ceaseless history of human being, science ushers in glory and rational system, which to us manifests not only academy but also our daily life. Wedged with person's life and existing in awareness, what invariably happened is that scientists, nine out of ten, make important discoveries when they were young. As a consequence, there are multitudes of people who under the hallucination that in every field of inquiry, the beginners are more often than not can find important discoveries. Notwithstanding, in my opinion, this is not the whole story.

To dispute this seemingly easy problem, we have to define the beginner and the expert. If the beginner is equated with younger scientist and expert is identical with the older one, there may arouse another weird question: how old shall we define young and old. As a result, apart from all the complicated consideration, I would rather believe that beginners are someone who just embark upon their research devoid of experiences, with which experts boasted.

Looking back on the science history, a myriad of scientists made names for themselves when they were young, but they are not beginner. What is more, they might be already experts. Obviously, although nobody can match old scientists in terms of experiences, young scientists are superior to the old scientists for they are in possession of uncontrollable ardent, magic ideas and are more energetic without so many private problems as old scientists. Most important discoveries are found in these scientists’ youth. When DNA structure, double helix, is found, Watson and Crick, one of them is only 25 and another is 35. Moreover, Einstein formed his idea when he was about 30. Multitudes of scientists are rewarded Nobel prizes for their achievement and discoveries made early years.

However, one of the great tragedies in the sphere of science is that because of some famous scientists, a great mass of tyros are under the shadow of so called old experts. Chances are good that these experts pursued fame in their early years, thus they lead a numerous doctors or post doctors in a certain research. But this area may have been widely explored, thus these doctors have little chance to make a paramount discoveries, which exert a psychedelic to society that new scientists are inferior to the old ones. What is more, although they might be already experts but still treated as a beginner, and when they discovered something significant, the mass catch an illusion called  "beginner's success", which trigger the given statement.

Admittedly, there are rare instances that few scientists without experiences or profundity of research can make groundbreaking discoveries, and Faraday may be one of these distinguished ones. However, in the era of rapid developing world, it is impossible for an undergraduate to discovery something unparalleled.

If our science is entirely discovered by beginner, why shall we take this long journey of science research, why shall we still need so many experts, why shall we still cherish our accumulated knowledge and spend years studying it? Retrospectively, as far as I concerned, experts are invariably beyond the beginner although there are times when expert may be young, and all discoveries are the accumulations of previous knowledge with creative and aspiring sparks.

朽木白哉UID: 195804

看下。。。

看了提纲先 你是想说 beginner 不能有新发现么？

boyjimUID: 125249

是的~

flyingwindUID: 189320

写的象是在说社么样的人是beginner
数学题一样

boyjimUID: 125249

最初由 flyingwind 发布
[B]写的象是在说社么样的人是beginner
数学题一样 [/B]

看来不幸的pt了~~~ :(

tristan2004UID: 173439

文章写得不错，很有见地，对我也很有启发：）
提一点不足，倒数第二段展开的有些不足，仅仅简单的说一句在现代社会新手很难有发现就结束太仓促了

龙非UID: 193190

咳咳，再占个位置

boyjimUID: 125249

龙哥要猛拍！我觉得跑题了~

flyingwindUID: 189320

第1段定义，点到就好，没有也无不可，不需要这么个大段落

你的提纲提纲：
1定义beginner
2很多年轻专家有新发现-但是他们不是beginner
3但是很多人认为年轻专家就是beginner
没有都可以

4现在begnner能获得成功的机会已经很少了
没跑，可以当反面例子

龙非UID: 193190

交作业

××××××××××××××××××××××××
87"In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
正文-----------------
1定义beginner
2很多年轻专家有新发现-但是他们不是beginner
3但是很多人认为年轻专家就是beginner
4现在begnner能获得成功的机会已经很少了~例子都是死掉的人
从提纲来看，论点应该是否定，也就是说还是专家容易，只是专家有重大发现的时候很年轻，所以大家以为是新手容易。重点有点偏向于解释人们为什么认为新手容易，而不是论证专家比新手容易，危险。。。
In the ceaseless history of human being, science ushers in glory and rational system, which to us manifests not only academy but also our daily life. Wedged with person's life and existing in awareness, what invariably happened is that scientists, nine out of ten, make important discoveries when they were young. surely？不见得吧，nine out of ten不够严谨 As a consequence, there are multitudes of people who under the hallucination that in every field of inquiry, the beginners are more often than not can find important discoveries. Notwithstanding, in my opinion, this is not the whole story. 个人觉得能够明确提出论点会更好，不是这样那是什么样？当然，这样会死板一点，但是议论文嘛，这样读者可以更好的理解你想说的东西

To dispute this seemingly easy problem, we have to define the beginner and the expert. If the beginner is equated with younger scientist and expert is identical with the older one, there may arouse another weird question: how old shall we define young and old. As a result, apart from all the complicated consideration, I would rather believe that beginners are someone who just embark upon their research devoid of experiences, with which experts boasted.定义得好，我的观点也是跟你一样，新手差的仅仅是经验，不过我没有你写得这么有文采:D，明天发上来

Looking back on the science history, a myriad of scientists made names for themselves when they were young, but they are not beginner. What is more, they might be already experts. Obviously, although nobody can match old scientists in terms of experiences, young scientists are superior to the old scientists for they are in possession of uncontrollable ardent, magic ideas and are more energetic without so many private problems as old scientists. Most important discoveries are found in these scientists’ youth. When DNA structure, double helix, is found, Watson and Crick, one of them is only 25 and another is 35. Moreover, Einstein formed his idea when he was about 30. Multitudes of scientists are rewarded Nobel prizes for their achievement and discoveries made early years. 中心不明确，第一句以为你接下来要论证年轻科学家其实不是新手，已是专家。但是第二句讲年轻科学家的优势，第三句将很多发现是科学家年轻的时候发现的，抓不住你的重点

However, one of the great tragedies in the sphere of science is that because of some famous scientists, a great mass of tyros are under the shadow of so called old experts. Chances are good that these experts pursued fame in their early years, thus they lead a numerous doctors or post doctors in a certain research. But this area may have been widely explored, thus these doctors have little chance to make a paramount discoveries, which exert a psychedelic to society that new scientists are inferior to the old ones. What is more, although they might be already experts but still treated as a beginner, and when they discovered something significant, the mass catch an illusion called "beginner's success", which trigger the given statement. 还是重点不明确，主要谈了两点，其一doctors很难在一个已经广泛探索过的领域去做重大发现（其实这点本身就很难说服人，爱因斯坦发现相对论的时候，力学领域人们都认为已经很完善了。而且从常识上来说，科学从来就没有那个领域说被广泛探索过了，连渣都没得剩）；其二是当他们成为了专家的时候仍然被当做新手，所以他们的发现也被当做“新手的成功”

Admittedly, there are rare instances that few scientists without experiences or profundity of research can make groundbreaking discoveries rare和few，双重否定, and Faraday may be one of these distinguished ones. However, in the era of rapid developing world, it is impossible for an undergraduate to discovery something unparalleled. 法拉第没有经验吗？undergraduate和without experiences or profundity of research是一回事吗？显然不是

If our science is entirely discovered by beginner, why shall we take this long journey of science research, why shall we still need so many experts, why shall we still cherish our accumulated knowledge and spend years studying it? Retrospectively, as far as I concerned, experts are invariably beyond the beginner although there are times when expert may be young, and all discoveries are the accumulations of previous knowledge with creative and aspiring sparks

整体来说，语言依然是那么优美，但是论证不如144清晰，感觉飘，不好。。。

boyjimUID: 125249

××××××××××××××××××××××××
87"In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."
正文-----------------
1定义beginner
2很多年轻专家有新发现-但是他们不是beginner
3但是很多人认为年轻专家就是beginner
4现在begnner能获得成功的机会已经很少了~例子都是死掉的人
从提纲来看，论点应该是否定，也就是说还是专家容易，只是专家有重大发现的时候很年轻，所以大家以为是新手容易。重点有点偏向于解释人们为什么认为新手容易，而不是论证专家比新手容易，危险。。。
[我终于发现为什么我觉得跑题，但是却不知道跑哪里了~]
In the ceaseless history of human being, science ushers in glory and rational system, which to us manifests not only academy but also our daily life. Wedged with person's life and existing in awareness, what invariably happened is that scientists, nine out of ten, make important discoveries when they were young. surely？不见得吧，nine out of ten不够严谨 [应该说很不严谨~太绝对了，收到] As a consequence, there are multitudes of people who under the hallucination that in every field of inquiry, the beginners are more often than not can find important discoveries. Notwithstanding, in my opinion, this is not the whole story. 个人觉得能够明确提出论点会更好，不是这样那是什么样？当然，这样会死板一点，但是议论文嘛，这样读者可以更好的理解你想说的东西
[议论文议论文~~~小弟一定牢记]
To dispute this seemingly easy problem, we have to define the beginner and the expert. If the beginner is equated with younger scientist and expert is identical with the older one, there may arouse another weird question: how old shall we define young and old. As a result, apart from all the complicated consideration, I would rather believe that beginners are someone who just embark upon their research devoid of experiences, with which experts boasted.定义得好，我的观点也是跟你一样，新手差的仅仅是经验，不过我没有你写得这么有文采，明天发上来
[龙哥~别这么说~今天晚上在写一篇~明天帮我改哦~嘿嘿嘿~]
Looking back on the science history, a myriad of scientists made names for themselves when they were young, but they are not beginner. What is more, they might be already experts. Obviously, although nobody can match old scientists in terms of experiences, young scientists are superior to the old scientists for they are in possession of uncontrollable ardent, magic ideas and are more energetic without so many private problems as old scientists. Most important discoveries are found in these scientists’ youth. When DNA structure, double helix, is found, Watson and Crick, one of them is only 25 and another is 35. Moreover, Einstein formed his idea when he was about 30. Multitudes of scientists are rewarded Nobel prizes for their achievement and discoveries made early years. 中心不明确，第一句以为你接下来要论证年轻科学家其实不是新手，已是专家。但是第二句讲年轻科学家的优势，第三句将很多发现是科学家年轻的时候发现的，抓不住你的重点
[跑的十万八千里了~~~]
However, one of the great tragedies in the sphere of science is that because of some famous scientists, a great mass of tyros are under the shadow of so called old experts. Chances are good that these experts pursued fame in their early years, thus they lead a numerous doctors or post doctors in a certain research. But this area may have been widely explored, thus these doctors have little chance to make a paramount discoveries, which exert a psychedelic to society that new scientists are inferior to the old ones. What is more, although they might be already experts but still treated as a beginner, and when they discovered something significant, the mass catch an illusion called "beginner's success", which trigger the given statement. 还是重点不明确，主要谈了两点，其一doctors很难在一个已经广泛探索过的领域去做重大发现（其实这点本身就很难说服人，爱因斯坦发现相对论的时候，力学领域人们都认为已经很完善了。而且从常识上来说，科学从来就没有那个领域说被广泛探索过了，连渣都没得剩） [我为了想一个理由而捏造了一个理由~~~学术腐败阿~~~] ；其二是当他们成为了专家的时候仍然被当做新手，所以他们的发现也被当做“新手的成功” [这个理由我觉得还可以把~]

Admittedly, there are rare instances that few scientists without experiences or profundity of research can make groundbreaking discoveries rare和few，双重否定, and Faraday may be one of these distinguished ones. However, in the era of rapid developing world, it is impossible for an undergraduate to discovery something unparalleled. 法拉第没有经验吗？undergraduate和without experiences or profundity of research是一回事吗？显然不是 [到底beginner是什么？我现在也觉得本科生也不一定是beginner,Nash就是本科就发现了那个XX等式...思考ing]

If our science is entirely discovered by beginner, why shall we take this long journey of science research, why shall we still need so many experts, why shall we still cherish our accumulated knowledge and spend years studying it? Retrospectively, as far as I concerned, experts are invariably beyond the beginner although there are times when expert may be young, and all discoveries are the accumulations of previous knowledge with creative and aspiring sparks

整体来说，语言依然是那么优美，但是论证不如144清晰，感觉飘，不好。。。
[幸好不是鬼哥来改~~要不就要哭了~~~~哈哈~]

鬼谷子UID: 159645

[幸好不是鬼哥来改~~要不就要哭了~~~~哈哈~]
啊？我有那么吓人吗？:D

boyjimUID: 125249

最初由 鬼谷子 发布
[B][幸好不是鬼哥来改~~要不就要哭了~~~~哈哈~]
啊？我有那么吓人吗？:D [/B]

鬼哥~给我看看吧~粗略的看看也好了~
今晚在写一次~尽量不跑题~~ :p

鬼谷子UID: 159645

正在看呢，一会儿发上来

boyjimUID: 125249

最初由 鬼谷子 发布
[B]正在看呢，一会儿发上来 [/B]

帮我把144也看看~ :p