issue110 讲故事的历史学家

boyjimUID: 125249

110"When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers."
1历史从何而来~事实从证据而来~历史真实
2问题由来~为什么有人说历史学家讲故事~
3相同的历史证据会有不同的意见~这个只是暂时的~历史的错误不是历史学家导致的
正文------
This is the era of legend, and this is the course of changing, but what invariably happened is that our history is never changed. It exists where it was, what is was, and how is was. For recent, we have camera to cite them. For the past, we have documentation to note them. For the prehistory, we have fossils to record them. Although we fail to invent a time machine in our real world, we always can tell what happen and why it happen and even how it happen in our complicated and complex history. Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, they are facts and the one who discovered them, the historians, are not storytellers, but the collectors of ashes of time.

History, we know, nine out of ten, are told by the evidences of past. Explorers and adventurer challenged the overwhelming virgin forest in South America, and found Maya civilization. Anthropologists and archaeologists collect these bricks and tiles from the pyramids and endeavor to find a slight of human trace. Biologists and Chemists use their equipment to detect the Carbon-14 dating the time span of the precious. And finally, the historian collect all their great historic fragment, using their professional knowledge to regroup these past of mortal, and unearth the yesterday's civilization, and enable us to witness the magical flourish of past. Without these evidences, historian can hardly draw any conclusion about the history, thus, how can we call our historians, who industriously work to conquer the perplexing and complex procedure, only storytellers?

We are keen on the funny story on the movie, and we fancy the magic story in the novel, but the sad truth is that they are not reality in the history and they are not written by historian. What we encounter in our childhood is fabulous and dramatic story with the purpose to appeal our eyes, and we simply believe that these stories are definitely happened in our history. When we grow up and finally find what we stick to is entirely fake and they just written based on some historic issues, we feel cheated and name these historian storyteller, giving us an illusion to dream, a delusion to imagine, a hallucination to conceive. And maybe that is one of the reasons give rise to the stained name for the historian. They are not storytellers; they are scientists who make the history sense.

True, with same materials, diverse historians conclude distinctively, but there is every possibility that we are still lack of something we need, and something we remain unknown. When the right time comes, chances are good that these debates about a certain issue in the history will eventually be tackled and settled perfectly. Even though some of the historic evidences are misunderstood contemporarily, we shall never attribute these faults to historian who have done a good job to construe these marrow of time and the essence of past although not extreme exact, and we should ascribe the flaw to anachronism.

Although storyteller is not very notorious name, historians are insulted for their dignity’s sake. We always respect historian because they respect evidence, although they might commit some minor faults, but of what value is our history if all the history we learn are not true hook, line and sinker, if all the historian are merely a storyteller who are in want of amusing the audience, and if the world, now and past, in which we lived, are full of big jokes, but still unfortunately filled with tragedies, catastrophes and stained humanity.

ponponUID: 181304

占座

ponponUID: 181304

This is the era of legend, and this is the course of changing, but what invariably happened is that our history iswould be never changed. It exists where it was, what is was, and how is was好深刻的话，在那学的，解析一下好嘛. For recent没见过这种用法recently, we have camera to cite them. For the past, we have documentation to note them. For the prehistory, we have fossils to record them. Although we fail to invent a time machine in our real world, we always can tell what happen and why it happen and even how it happen in our complicated and complex history. Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, they are facts and the one who discovered them, the historians, are not storytellers, but the collectors of ashes of time.very reasonable and perfect beginning

History, we know, nine out of ten, are told by the evidences of past. Explorers and adventurer challenged the overwhelming virgin forest in South America, and found Maya civilization. Anthropologists and archaeologists collect these bricks and tiles from the pyramids and endeavor to find a slight of human trace. Biologists and Chemists use their equipment to detect the Carbon-14 dating the time span of the precious. And finally, the historian collect all their great historic fragment, using their professional knowledge to regroup these past of mortal, and unearth the yesterday's civilization, and enable us to witness the magical flourish of past. Without these evidences, historian can hardly draw any conclusion about the history, thus, how can we call our historians, who industriously work to conquer the perplexing and complex procedure, only storytellers?
看完这一段觉得你得论据例子真得很充分，自不入啊
We are keen on the funny story on the movie, and we fancy the magic story in the novel, but the sad truth is that they are not reality in the history and they are not written by historian. What we encounter in our childhood is fabulous and dramatic story with the purpose to appeal our eyes, and we simply believe that these stories are definitely happened in our history. When we grow up and finally find what we stick to is entirely fake and they just written based on some historic issues, we feel cheated and name these historian storyteller, giving us an illusion to dream, a delusion to imagine, a hallucination to conceive. And maybe that is one of the reasons give rise to the stained name for the historian. They are not storytellers; they are scientists who make the history sense.

True, with same materials, diverse historians conclude distinctively, but there is every possibility that we are still lack of something we need, and something we remain unknown. When the right time comes, chances are good that these debates about a certain issue in the history will eventually be tackled and settled perfectly. Even though some of the historic evidences are misunderstood contemporarily, we shall never attribute these faults to historian who have done a good job to construe these marrow of time and the essence of past although not extreme exact, and we should ascribe the flaw to anachronism.感觉你的句式用的很活，但是正确性我无法确定，可能是水平有限，比如开头单用true,每一段单独来说写的很棒，但是好像缺乏连接，象在拼一样，呵呵，别见怪！

Although storyteller is not very notorious name, historians are insulted for their dignity’s sake. We always respect historian because they respect evidence, although they might commit some minor faults, but of what value is our history if all the history we learn are not true hook, line and sinker, if all the historian are merely a storyteller who are in want of amusing the audience, and if the world, now and past, in which we lived, are full of big jokes, but still unfortunately filled with tragedies, catastrophes and stained humanity.

boyjimUID: 125249

楼上的~偶得语法很差的~~其实~~~5555555

猫猫624UID: 171232

This is the era of legend, and this is the course of changing, but what invariably happened is that our history is never changed. It exists where it was, what is was, it wasand how is was. For recent 我没见过这种用法，见笑，recently常见,或for recent era, we have cameracameras to cite them. For the past, we have documentation to note them. For the prehistory, we have fossils to record them.排比句建议放到一个句子里，用分号隔 Although we fail to invent a time machine in our real world, we always can tell what happen and why it happen and even how it happen in our complicated and complex history. Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, they指谁history？ are facts and the one 又指谁the historians？who discovered them, the historians, are not storytellers, but the collectors of ashes of time.最后一句指没有看懂

History, we know, nine out of ten, are istold by the evidences不可数 of past. Explorers and adventurers challenged the overwhelming virgin forest in South America, and found Maya civilization.后面都是一般时，为什么这句过去时 Anthropologists and archaeologists collect these bricks and tiles from the pyramids and endeavor to find a slight of human trace. Biologists and Chemists use their equipment to detect the Carbon-14 dating the time span of the precious. And finally, the historian collect all their great historic fragments, using use their professional knowledge to regroup these pasts of mortal, and unearth the yesterday's civilization, and enable us to witness the magical flourish of past. 例子举得不错Without these evidences evidence, historian can hardly draw any conclusion about the history, thus, how can we call our historians, who industriously work to conquer the perplexing and complex procedure, only storytellers?

We are keen on the funny story funny stories on the movie, and we fancy the magic story magic stories 不特指用复数不加官词 in the novel, but the sad truth is that they are not reality in the history and they are not written by historian. What we encounter in our childhood is fabulous and dramatic story with the purpose to appeal our eyes, and we simply believe that these stories are definitely happened in our history. When we grow up and finally find what we stick to is entirely fake and they just written based on some historic issues, we feel cheated and name these historian storytellers, giving us an illusion to dream, a delusion to imagine, a hallucination to conceive. And maybe that is one of the reasons give rise to the stained name for the historian. They are not storytellers; they are scientists who make the history sense.

it is 可以少吗？True, with same materials, diverse historians conclude distinctively, but there is it isevery possibility that we are still lack of something we need, and something we remain unknown. When the right time comes, chances are good that these debates about a certain issue in the history will eventually be tackled and settled perfectly. Even though some of the historic evidences are misunderstood contemporarily, we shall口语化词 never attribute these faults to historian who have done a good job to construe these marrow of time and the essence of past although not extreme exact, and we should ascribe the flaw to anachronism.

Although storyteller is not very notorious name, historians are insulted for their dignity’s sake. We always respect historian because they respect evidence, although they might commit some minor faults, but although 后面加but?of what value is our history if all the history we learn are not true hook, line and sinker, if all the historian are merely a storytellerstorytellers who are in want of be in want of?amusing the audience, and if the world, now and past, in which we lived, are full of big jokes, but still unfortunately filled with tragedies, catastrophes and stained humanity.
搂主的文章写的我感觉不成功。首先语法错误多，很多只代不明，我无法看懂在写什么。前面是单数后面就是复数，例如the historian are merely a storyteller who are。。。。。。。例外很多用法也许是我水平有限吧，没有见过，至少没有在正式文体见过。有什么不足的请搂主海涵。最后搂主很喜欢用排比，我认为很好，但排比对语言要求很高，不要去为了排比凑一些没有见过的搭配，而且排比也不易过多。至于逻辑我觉得文章有点松散,段之间过渡不够

boyjimUID: 125249

This is the era of legend, and this is the course of changing, but what invariably happened is that our history is never changed. It exists where it was, what is was, it wasand how is was. For recent 我没见过这种用法，见笑，recently常见,或for recent era[current days], we have cameracameras to cite them. For the past, we have documentation to note them. For the prehistory, we have fossils to record them.排比句建议放到一个句子里，用分号隔 [收到]Although we fail to invent a time machine in our real world, we always can tell what happen and why it happen and even how it happen in our complicated and complex history. Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, they指谁history？[对] are facts and the one 又指谁the historians？[对]who discovered them, the historians, are not storytellers, but the collectors of ashes of time.最后一句指没有看懂[时间灰烬中的狩猎者]

History, we know, nine out of ten, are istold by the evidences不可数[真的么？我怎么好像见过] of past. Explorers and adventurers challenged the overwhelming virgin forest in South America, and found Maya civilization.后面都是一般时，为什么这句过去时[发现是16，17世纪的事情，但是研究一直在进行] Anthropologists and archaeologists collect these bricks and tiles from the pyramids and endeavor to find a slight of human trace. Biologists and Chemists use their equipment to detect the Carbon-14 dating the time span of the precious. And finally, the historian collect all their great historic fragments, using use their professional knowledge to regroup these pasts of mortal, and unearth the yesterday's civilization, and enable us to witness the magical flourish of past. 例子举得不错Without these evidences evidence, historian can hardly draw any conclusion about the history, thus, how can we call our historians, who industriously work to conquer the perplexing and complex procedure, only storytellers?

We are keen on the funny story funny stories on the movie, and we fancy the magic story magic stories 不特指用复数不加官词 [收到]in the novel, but the sad truth is that they are not reality in the history and they are not written by historian. What we encounter in our childhood is fabulous and dramatic story with the purpose to appeal our eyes, and we simply believe that these stories are definitely happened in our history. When we grow up and finally find what we stick to is entirely fake and they just written based on some historic issues, we feel cheated and name these historian storytellers, giving us an illusion to dream, a delusion to imagine, a hallucination to conceive. And maybe that is one of the reasons give rise to the stained name for the historian. They are not storytellers; they are scientists who make the history sense.

it is 可以少吗？True, with same materials, diverse historians conclude distinctively, but there is it isevery possibility that we are still lack of something we need, and something we remain unknown. When the right time comes, chances are good that these debates about a certain issue in the history will eventually be tackled and settled perfectly. Even though some of the historic evidences are misunderstood contemporarily, we shall口语化词[are not obliged to]never attribute these faults to historian who have done a good job to construe these marrow of time and the essence of past although not extreme exact, and we should ascribe the flaw to anachronism.

Although storyteller is not very notorious name, historians are insulted for their dignity’s sake. We always respect historian because they respect evidence, although they might commit some minor faults, but although 后面加but?[表示转折]of what value is our history if all the history we learn are not true hook, line and sinker, if all the historian are merely a storytellerstorytellers who are in want of be in want of?amusing the audience, and if the world, now and past, in which we lived, are full of big jokes, but still unfortunately filled with tragedies, catastrophes and stained humanity.
搂主的文章写的我感觉不成功。首先语法错误多，[5555]很多只代不明，我无法看懂在写什么。前面是单数后面就是复数，例如the historian are merely a storyteller who are。。。。。。。例外很多用法也许是我水平有限吧，没有见过，至少没有在正式文体见过。有什么不足的请搂主海涵。最后搂主很喜欢用排比，我认为很好，但排比对语言要求很高，不要去为了排比凑一些没有见过的搭配，而且排比也不易过多。至于逻辑我觉得文章有点松散,段之间过渡不够[555555555这个偶知道~]

anthraxUID: 176473

占座，回头帮你改

猫猫624UID: 171232

Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, they指谁history？[对] history那为什么后面谓语动词是areare facts and the one 又指谁the historians？[对]one 后面谓语动词怎么又是arewho discovered them, the historians, are not storytellers, but the collectors of ashes of time.最后一句指没有看懂[时间灰烬中的狩猎者]
Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, it is facts and historians, ones who discovered them, are not storytellers, but  collectors of ashes of time.

by the evidences不可数[真的么？我怎么好像见过] of past看来你没有考过托福语法

although they might commit some minor faults, but although 后面加but?[表示转折]of what value is our history if all the history we learn are not true hook, line and sinker, if all the historian are一个句子表示转折能前面是although,后面是but吗？不要告诉我你初中没有学过


可能言语不太客气，我都提醒了，楼主还没有看出这些低级语法错误吗？
楼主冠次词使用有很多出不规范,什么时候the  什么时候名词复数
什么时候不定冠词,建议楼主从最基本的做起.否则错误太多,文章是不可能得高分的

staralwaysUID: 193479

读了一遍，感觉boyjim写散文一定会很好。

boyjimUID: 125249

最初由 猫猫624 发布Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, they指谁history？[对] history那为什么后面谓语动词是areare facts and the one 又指谁the historians？[对]one 后面谓语动词怎么又是arewho discovered them, the historians, are not storytellers, but the collectors of ashes of time.最后一句指没有看懂[时间灰烬中的狩猎者]
Although the history is always enveloped with mysterious air, it is facts and historians, ones who discovered them, are not storytellers, but collectors of ashes of time.
55555偶知道了~~~
by the evidences不可数[真的么？我怎么好像见过] of past看来你没有考过托福语法 [哇哇哇~~~托福语法偶60都上不了~~~想死了~~~]

although they might commit some minor faults, but although 后面加but?[表示转折]of what value is our history if all the history we learn are not true hook, line and sinker, if all the historian are一个句子表示转折能前面是although,后面是but吗？不要告诉我你初中没有学过....猫猫...你好凶......


可能言语不太客气，我都提醒了，楼主还没有看出这些低级语法错误吗？
楼主冠次词使用有很多出不规范,什么时候the 什么时候名词复数
什么时候不定冠词,建议楼主从最基本的做起.否则错误太多,文章是不可能得高分的 哎~基础差没办法拉~尽力拉~

[/B]

haze1894UID: 185775

我觉得在用词方面还需推敲，词性方面也许斟酌。有些用法我从来没读到过