- 最后登录
- 2008-1-10
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1255
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-7
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 468
- UID
- 181304
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1255
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-7
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
------摘要------
作者:寄托家园作文版普通用户 488 words
------题目------
It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value.
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
------正文------
Many people hold the viewpoint that it is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value. As far as I am concerned, admittedly, artist is the author of art which gives society value, however, critic is also of importance to value of society. Without critic, it is difficult for the artist to give society something of lasting value.
Many people hold the viewpoint that it is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value. As far as I am concerned, admittedly, artist is the author of art, however, critic is also of importance to value of society. Without critic, it is difficult for the artist to give society something of lasting value.
To begin with, it is the artist that creates the great art and works. Let us retrospect to history of art, it is no doubt (suspicion) that people can remember (remind) countless names of the artists, but seldom do people recall the names of the critics. Vinci, a great artist of Italian, created a great number of paintings such as Mona Lisa,Shakespeare, a famous novelist of England, who has written novels like Odyssey. Their names were sculpted in the milestone of art history for ever. These art works do great contributions to maintain and remind the history of human and give society something of value.
However, the critic also plays a significant role showing the value of art. There are always abstruse meanings in the art that common people can not acknowledge, so critic with a certain knowledge of art who understands its meaning could show people how to appreciate value of art. They can not only tell us the background of the art such as times, figures, location but only show us what spirit the artist wants to express in his/her art; moreover, the critic supplies some references for evaluating works of art, bad or good, meaningless or abstruseness. When works of art is created and open to the public, there will be critics who give all kinds of ideas and understandings to the art, whatever fair or unfair, they are beneficial to supply us a widely space of thinking and intact perspectives to acquire (grasp) the true meaning that the artists would like to show. Furthermore, When it comes to the artists, the critics give some feedback to works of art , after accepting the comments from the critic, the artist will know what the people want and how to best express themselves in the art.
Finally, the critic is just like a bridge which establishes the connection between the artist and the people. Without the critic, the artist may not clearly express their minds to the common, meanwhile, the common could not deeply understand the profudity of art, if so, we can imagine that the art will lose its potential value, therefore, we could not neglect the significant value that it takes.
To sum up, it is both the artist and the critic that play an important role of giving society something of value for ever. The artist creates great works of art for the human, while the critic, like a bridge, enlighten us how recognize and understand the meaning of art. Only by cooperating the artist and the critic can works of art takes lasting value to society. |
|