argument限时175 我要砖头

chzl1982UID: 182377

In the letter to the school boared in the town of Centerville the arguer proposes an effective and mandatory program sponsored by the high school to reduce the accidents in and Centerille.To substantiate the proposial the arguer provide series of reasons.However upon close scrutiny these reasons are not peruasive as discussed below.

To begin with the number of the accidents is so vague that it is open to doublt.To mention "serveral"the arguer failed to provide the concret  number and the percentile of the accidents involving the teenage drivers.Perhaps the accidents involving teenage drivers are actually so  insignificant that it just consisted only a small portion of the total  accidents.Without ruling out the possiblity the arguer can not persuade me the nessictiy of establishing the mandatory program.

Secondly,assuming the several accidents occured in and around the Centerville are to the extent that rendering it can not be ignorant,the  argument is still open to doublt as that those teenage drivers involving in the accidents are the students of Centerville.Perhaps most of them are the students from other regions and at the same time the teenage of the town are actually not driving cars.If this is the case then even though the proposed mandatory program is established the accident rate will not be reduced.

Thirdly,even assuming it is the local students commited those accidents  the arguer still can not proof the nessicity of establishing the program,with the existence of two driving schools in Centerville.The arguer just contented that parents were on tight budget to afford to pay for driving instruction.Yet the arguer failed to provide the number  of such parents and so it is maybe the number of this kind of parents are actually so small as can be neglected.

Finally,the arguer failed to take into considerate of other metiod to solve the problem.Perhaps there are better ways to the problem.Actually  assuming the mandatory program sponsored by the high school is the only solution the arguer still can not persuasive me that it ill be effective.

In sum the argument is dubious at best.To better evaluate this argument  the arguer has to provide more information to proof the neccity as well as the effectiveness of the proposied program.

chzl1982UID: 182377

ding

chzl1982UID: 182377

ding

chzl1982UID: 182377

顶