寄托天下
查看: 1986|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] 同主题issue 7,留链接回拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
364
注册时间
2005-3-12
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-4-1 00:00:57 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
摘要:
A VC比W真实可信,但不更重要
B VC真实、生动、有效
C W能激发想象力、深刻、便宜
D 因此,应联合使用


Issue7  第4篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
作者:寄托家园作文版普通用户     共用时间:52分56秒    515 words
从2005年2月31日22时17分到2005年2月31日23时52分
------题目------
The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contempor
ary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than writt
en records.
------正文------

Could video camera preponderate over written records in today's documentation? Admittedly, video materials provide more accurate and convincing records than written ones; however, hardly could the former surpass the latter.

Compared with paper-based records, video documentation undoubtedly offers people a more genuine and effective prospect. There are three reasons contributing to that edge. First, with the tape, certain events could be precisely reviewed by those who want to find some clues behind it. A clear example would be the criminal case investigations by the police who would be able to find some covert but convincing tracks valuable for cracking down gangs. However, this merit would be dwarfed when written evidence was regared. Second, cameras could vividly display the scene for those who could not got the opportunity to see it live, yet words and languages would seem comparatively pale. Nowadays if one try to record his or her wedding ceremony as family archive, it is believable that the video would be mostly likely the option. Last but not the least, as the information technology industry develops, cameras, including digital ones, would play a more and more important role in news broadcasting. With the help of this video materials, some kind of tremendous natural disasters, like the tsunami happened in Southeast Asia this year, could be shown the exact point on TV worldwide just a day after it took place; those effect would not be achieved by paper and pen, for there might be devoid of time either to find them for recording immediately or in making up the broadcasting program.

Then could we conclude that the video records have become more important than the written ones? Of course not. The latter also has many advantages deserving deliberations. For one thing, the words have their gifted ability to inspire one's creativity of images describing in the context. For instance, literal documents could retrospect from Cesar to Clinton, from Asia to America, from alpha to omega, with concise and certain words. In contrast, the video would limit people's focus on certain frames. For another, video could not offer the profound thought or idea one could enjoy from the lines. Not simply illustrate the paper documents  what happened but also why it took place. Without these written words, camera could be no more than a Xerox machine or an eloquent parrot. In addition, video materials might be costly, or even prohibitive sometimes, as an usual form of documentation compared to paper records. As a result, written records have their own importance as a basic form of documentation which could be replaced by any other alternative even in contemporary life.

In conclusion, the video camera does provide more accurate, vivid and immediate form of document than does the written words. Nevertheless one could not deny that paper based records endow people with profound background knowledge and viewpoints . So written records never live out the true meaning of its destiny even compared with video today, and people ought to take full advantage of both of them as important documentation forms.
hold on
=飞越
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
沙发
发表于 2005-4-1 09:53:30 |只看该作者
Could video camera preponderate over written records in today's documentation? Admittedly, it  provides video camera provides more accurate and convincing records than written ones; however, hardly can it the former surpass the importance of the latter. 开头够简洁,在第一段只代尽量清楚。意见是个人习惯,供参考

Compared with paper-based records, video documentation undoubtedly offers the reader a more genuine and effective prospect. There are three reasons contributing to that edge . First, with the tape, certain an event could be precisely reviewed by those who want to find some clues behind it. A clear example would be the criminal case investigations by the police who would be able to find some covert but convincing tracks valuable for cracking down gangs. While this merit would be dwarfed merit被 dwarf原来没有见过,是范文上的? when written evidence was applied句子有问题,两个分句,两个连词. Second, cameras could vividly display the scene for those who could not got getthe opportunity to see it live? 是实况转播的意思嘛?, yet words and languages would seem relatively pale. Nowadays if one try to record his or her wedding ceremony as family archive, it is believable that the video would be mostly likely the option. Last but not the least, as the information technology industry development, cameras, including digital ones, would play a more and more important role in news broadcasting. With the help of this video materials, some kind of tremendous natural disasters, like the tsunami强!这词背了几遍都没有背下来 happened in Southeast Asia this year, could be shown on TV or the net world widely just a day after it took place; those effect would not be achieved by paper and pen, for there might be invalid of time either to find them for recording or in making up the broadcasting program.

Then could we be able to conclude that the video records have become more important than the written ones? Surely not of course not. The latter also has many advantages deserving deliberations. For one thing, the words have their gifted ability to inspire one's creativity of images describing in the context. For instance, literal documents could retrospect from Caesar to Clinton, from Asia to America, from alpha to omega,挺好的,问一下有出处吗,还是自己写的 with concise and certain words. In contrast, the video would limit people's focus on certain frames. For another, video could not offer the profound thought or idea one could enjoy from the lines. Not only show the paper documents what happened but also why it took place. Without these written words, camera could be no more than a Xerox machine or an eloquent parrot. In addition, video materials might be costly, or even prohibitive sometimes, as an usual form of documentation compared to paper records. As a result, written records have their own importance as a basic form of documentation which couldnot这个很关键,不能少 be replaced by any other alternative even in contemporary life.

In conclusion, the video camera does provide more accurate, vivid and immediate form of document than does the written words. Nevertheless one anyone could not deny that paper based records endow people with profound background knowledge and viewpoints and with the opportunity to be creative as well. So written records never live out the true meaning of its destiny even compared with video today, and people ought to take full advantage of both of them as important documentation forms.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
364
注册时间
2005-3-12
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2005-4-1 18:26:12 |只看该作者
[QUOTE]最初由 猫猫624 发布
[B]Could video camera preponderate over written records in today's documentation? Admittedly, it  provides video camera provides more accurate ..

edge ?
优势

While this merit would be dwarfed merit被 dwarf原来没有见过,是范文上的? when written evidence was applied句子有问题,两个分句,两个连词.

没有背过范文,是说优点不明显了(dwarf使显得小)
另外,while是表转折连词,when是副词,引导时间状从


Second, cameras could vividly display the scene for those who could not got getthe opportunity to see it live? 是实况转播的意思嘛?,



tsunami强!这词背了几遍都没有背下来

tsun=qun,ami=army,一群军队排山倒海一样压过来

For instance, literal documents could retrospect from Caesar to Clinton, from Asia to America, from alpha to omega,挺好的,问一下有出处吗,还是自己写的

自己写的,对吗?
hold on
=飞越

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
3219
注册时间
2004-7-24
精华
2
帖子
4
地板
发表于 2005-4-1 19:07:42 |只看该作者
最初由 ooaj 发布
[B][QUOTE]最初由 猫猫624 发布
[B]Could video camera preponderate over written records in today's documentation? Admittedly, it  provides video ..

以下省略...... [/B]


edge 优势=advantage

好象2004.5月托福阅读题有这么一道考单词的.熟词僻义


没有背过范文,是说优点不明显了(dwarf使显得小)

如果见过就可以用.没有见过就不要用.至少我查google没有这样的用法.

For instance, literal documents could retrospect from Caesar to Clinton, from Asia to America, from alpha to omega,挺好的,问一下有出处吗,还是自己写的

自己写的,对吗?


我觉得最后的from alpha to omega,挺好,前面两个不好说

Second, cameras could vividly display the scene for those who could not got getthe opportunity to see it live? 是实况转播的意思嘛?,



live 做实况转播做后值定语是adj,, 不能做adv 这里修饰it ,代词不能用形容词修饰.把it 改成programs
之类的

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
364
注册时间
2005-3-12
精华
0
帖子
0
5
发表于 2005-4-1 21:53:32 |只看该作者
[QUOTE]最初由 猫猫624 发布
[B][QUOTE]最初由 ooaj 发布
[B][QUOTE]最初由 猫猫624 发布
[B]Could video camera preponderate over written records in today's documentation? Admitted..

from alpha to omega, 是习惯用法,极言其广,可以放心用~
另外两个是我配合这个附送的,哈哈

live经查可以作adv,如:This show is going out live.

谢谢猫猫,以后多拍我! :)
hold on
=飞越

使用道具 举报

RE: 同主题issue 7,留链接回拍 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
同主题issue 7,留链接回拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-260796-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部