- 最后登录
- 2012-4-28
- 在线时间
- 250 小时
- 寄托币
- 3219
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-7-24
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 4
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 1571
- UID
- 171232

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 3219
- 注册时间
- 2004-7-24
- 精华
- 2
- 帖子
- 4
|
Could video camera preponderate over written records in today's documentation? Admittedly, it provides video camera provides more accurate and convincing records than written ones; however, hardly can it the former surpass the importance of the latter. 开头够简洁,在第一段只代尽量清楚。意见是个人习惯,供参考
Compared with paper-based records, video documentation undoubtedly offers the reader a more genuine and effective prospect. There are three reasons contributing to that edge ?. First, with the tape, certain an event could be precisely reviewed by those who want to find some clues behind it. A clear example would be the criminal case investigations by the police who would be able to find some covert but convincing tracks valuable for cracking down gangs. While this merit would be dwarfed merit被 dwarf原来没有见过,是范文上的? when written evidence was applied句子有问题,两个分句,两个连词. Second, cameras could vividly display the scene for those who could not got getthe opportunity to see it live? 是实况转播的意思嘛?, yet words and languages would seem relatively pale. Nowadays if one try to record his or her wedding ceremony as family archive, it is believable that the video would be mostly likely the option. Last but not the least, as the information technology industry development, cameras, including digital ones, would play a more and more important role in news broadcasting. With the help of this video materials, some kind of tremendous natural disasters, like the tsunami强!这词背了几遍都没有背下来 happened in Southeast Asia this year, could be shown on TV or the net world widely just a day after it took place; those effect would not be achieved by paper and pen, for there might be invalid of time either to find them for recording or in making up the broadcasting program.
Then could we be able to conclude that the video records have become more important than the written ones? Surely not of course not. The latter also has many advantages deserving deliberations. For one thing, the words have their gifted ability to inspire one's creativity of images describing in the context. For instance, literal documents could retrospect from Caesar to Clinton, from Asia to America, from alpha to omega,挺好的,问一下有出处吗,还是自己写的 with concise and certain words. In contrast, the video would limit people's focus on certain frames. For another, video could not offer the profound thought or idea one could enjoy from the lines. Not only show the paper documents what happened but also why it took place. Without these written words, camera could be no more than a Xerox machine or an eloquent parrot. In addition, video materials might be costly, or even prohibitive sometimes, as an usual form of documentation compared to paper records. As a result, written records have their own importance as a basic form of documentation which couldnot这个很关键,不能少 be replaced by any other alternative even in contemporary life.
In conclusion, the video camera does provide more accurate, vivid and immediate form of document than does the written words. Nevertheless one anyone could not deny that paper based records endow people with profound background knowledge and viewpoints and with the opportunity to be creative as well. So written records never live out the true meaning of its destiny even compared with video today, and people ought to take full advantage of both of them as important documentation forms. |
|