自己写的04年2月21日作文

playbearleeUID: 198693

Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them. Other believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatments. Discuss both views are how do you think about it.

Nowadays, with the improvement of the education, it rises a hot-debated topic what is a appropriate teaching method. Some people tend to consider teaching children together, while some others refer to teach them separately for different treatments. I believe both of them have their functions and it depends on specific situation.

It is a traditional method to teach children together, which most of schools adopt to. Some people think it is beneficial to the development of children. Because education’s function does not focus on academics only, but lots of other things included, such as competition and cooperation. And also, studying together is marvelously successful at helping children to communicate effectively. For a long term, it helps to cultivate a sense of equality, which may make children to being full social inclusion. Under this educational circumstance, not only can children accept those who are different from themselves, but also can they treat social diversity by scientific attitude.

However, it is easily to see the upper view’s disadvantages, because of it purposeless. It is not able to foster the potentiality of each child. Therefore, some people tend to the view of taking special treatments separately. They believe different abilities means to different methods. Since ancient times, many celebrities affirm its suitable functions, Confucius for instance. Individualization within the class or group is crucial if each child is going to reach his or her full potentiality. And this flexibility does meet this effectively.

As far as I concerned, both of them are playing their own roles in teaching system. It is meaningless to discuss which is better or which is worse. As a mainstream of present education, teaching children can not be replaced in a short time due to the limit educational resources, such as experienced teachers and advanced facilities. Meanwhile, individual differences should not be ignored. For example, some students are quicker on the uptake than others. Others take a long time to grasp concepts. Their time needs must be recognized.

To sum up, every method has characteristics and some downside also be involved. Which method is adopt to at most partly lays on specific situation. Furthermore, the most reasonable way is the combination of the both ways. [/SIZE]

莫非斯托UID: 198574

helping children to（to 应该去掉） communicate effectively

lucy_zq2002UID: 177408

为了防止干扰，我没有看楼主的文章，如有雷同，实属巧合：）
谢谢这么勤劳的写文章，没有你的贡献，我是不会动笔的。辛苦了！

My version

Involving numeric students in one classroom with all kinds of teaching is a traditional education way ,whereas some one claim that intelligent children being sorted out and cheated separately would receive better effects.In my opinion ,it is a matter of choice under some circumstances for both methods have pros and cons.

It help children to develop different skills studing with their fellows. As the old saying goes,if three of us are walking together, at least one of the other two is good enough to be my teacher.One can't cover all knowledges and there must be someone doing better than you in some fields.Studing together with different telents tells you how to appreciate others ,from which you may have a critical look at yourself as well.

However,I don't deny some extinguished students need tuitor's more attention.Firstly ,they deserve it.They belong to certain types of generation.If given a chance to assemble them and  taught by teachers in a prfound level, they may go further in their displines.Secondly,they need it.Being taught in the same class of which the teacher equally treated is liable to hinder those smart students' self-development.

But drawbacks are also clear.On one hand,those groups tend to negelect absorbing or attach to other fields .Nowadays it's more and more important to emphasize all-round development,obviously,their knowledge struture can't satisfy or even update with the society.
On the other hand,it causes someone's selfishness and arrogance due to fierce competition or special treat.

As for myself ,I'd rather choose a midway.I don't like to sacrifise different learning to broadon my horizon ,on this basis, I may go and attend some study groups due to my interest and ability.I think it's a practical and efficient way for many students especially in China.

Anyway,it's not simly a question of being a specialist or genealist.We students should absorb all kind of knowledge ,because knowledge is might!

lucy_zq2002UID: 177408

刚拜读了楼主的文章，偶觉得不错！用词不错，句型也有变化。只是个别搭配不对和语法错误：）

playbearleeUID: 198693

谢谢楼上的建议哦，确实自己感觉很多句子表达都有点问题
楼上的文章我晚上回来再拜读哦，现在睡午觉啦，下午去看书，呵呵

playbearleeUID: 198693

还是忍不住看了下，这个好象最好不在写作中吧，感觉不够正式pros and cons.
As the old saying goes,if three of us are walking together, at least one of the other two is good enough to be my teacher不知道是真有这个表达，还是你自己译的。请赐教哦
其他的还没有看，呵呵，晚上再来看
请楼主也帮我点点问题吧，呵呵