【GRE作文考生必读】澄清GRE作文考生认识上的一个基本误区

踏浪而来UID: 2263383

不是废话吗，谁都知道，但关键是你有逻辑，你能够很好的表达吗？
你以为中国学生都是傻子，他们中的大部分比你想象中的要聪明地多得多，关键就是一个合理表达地问题，其他的一切问题都不算是问题！

johnkoalaUID: 2250994

谢谢楼主，让我明白了很多（：

最後の使徒UID: 2257608

原帖由 踏浪而来 于 2006-11-16 12:33 发表
不是废话吗，谁都知道，但关键是你有逻辑，你能够很好的表达吗？
你以为中国学生都是傻子，他们中的大部分比你想象中的要聪明地多得多，关键就是一个合理表达地问题，其他的一切问题都不算是问题！

In this argument, the author claims that the person who published this thread is taking all Chinese students as fools and assesses his article as rubbish. To support this assertion, he questions that even the students have logical thoughts, they cannot express effectively. Such statements seem to be aggressive and rude at the first glance, moreover, they suffer from lacking of understanding about this thread.

Fundamentally, the thread publisher has never claimed that all Chinese students are fools, what he reminds about is all based on his experience as evidence. It is hasty to take the thread as a statement taking all Chinese students as fools. To make his assertion more convincing, deeper analysis is needed for the author to ensure about this thread's haughty.

Even assuming that the thread publisher claims that Chinese students are not smart as reality, the author's conclusion is still unconvincing. Reading this thread can tell us that the publisher is talking about the attitude about issue's logic and sufficient evidence is provided about students'  puzzle on it. But this author asserts that all students are suffering from problems in expressing but not logical thinking, without any survey mentioned. Such an assertion lacks of evidence.

Meanwhile, the author hastily claims that all people know what is said in this thread. As we know, those who do not take GRE test will pay no attention to such an issue, do they know this? Even those who take GRE test and have prepared for AW may still have questions which have been solved by this thread. The large amount of replies admitting the thread can be a striking evidence.

To sum up, such an argument makes no sense but provocation. To make his words more acceptable, the author needs to read this thread carefully to understand the publisher's will and provide more evidence to improve this thread is useless. Meanwhile, to make the forum better for dicussing in a friendly atmosphere, it will be good for medorators to punish such a reply.

hecrazyUID: 2230858

加深了我对Issue的理解，太及时了，Thanks a lot！

norman518UID: 188582

哎...“强者故强，弱者恒弱！”