0510G同主题写作第十七期－－Issue4

wineyreUID：2106739

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=318479
迟到

popsywinterUID：2120302

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D101

xiliustreamUID：205175

偶的
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=319079

xiliustreamUID：205175

斑竹，问个问题，谢了，就是我看了一些人的文章，发现他们body段先说学科交叉比较重要，只有很多领域的专家聚在一起才能解决某个问题，为社会做出贡献，但这样没说明白外领域对本领域什么重大的促进啊，算离题吗？还是我思维太狭窄了？

moria's cakeUID：122815

."No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their
knowledge and experience to that field of study."

Started: 16:17

Main points:
Agree.
1.        No one field of study could develop on its own. Different fields of studies could supplement each other. Exp, math and physiology.

2.        The combination of relevant subjects creates new dimension of study and broaden our view of the world, thus contribute to the development of the human society. Examples, economics and sociology combine to form socioeconomics.

3.        The inadequateness of focusing solely on one subject could narrow down one’s scope and hamper the development. We need to out source.

Issue essay:


I agree with the assertion above, just as I would support the general education in universities. It is long debated that if universities should provide general education or professional trainings to students. Some claims that universities should just focus on conveying professional skills and knowledge to their students, for many students, if not all, attend universities, pursuing a diploma as an advantage in the job market. So, the general education seems a waste of time.  This may be true to some, however, as far as I am concerned, general education is a supplement to our highly specialization society and, to the contrary of what the opponents claimed, it helps to further ones’ study in a specific field.

Firstly, no one study could develop on its own. Knowledge dose not evolve alone, rather, it is a concomitant of other components of human society, as the progress of civilization.  Thus, one field of study, from the date it was initiated, would inevitably be affected by other elements of the society.  When we focus on one field of study, we need knowledge of other fields to help us to understand the one we are focusing on. The most convenient example of this is the relationship between physiology and math.  As we may know, math and physiology are closely related to each other. Many theories of physiology are stated in forms of mathematical formulas. Without the help of mathematics, some theories may be extended to pages of explanation and it is not convenient to apply to use and state.

Secondly, it is not unusual that relevant subjects combine to form another new subject, which is a progress in human society. Some fields of studies are combinations of different areas of study. To name a few, the socioeconomics, the ecolonomics, etc. These combinations of different studies broaden the scope of study fields and help us to analyze or solve social problems in a new way. For example, the socioeconomics lend us a new aspect from which we could understand that any social conflict is, to some extend, no more than an economical conflict between different parties. And thus the government could reconcile the conflict between different parties in consideration of the profit of most, if not all, the social parties, when projecting a new regulation.

Finally, the inadequateness of focusing solely on one subject could narrow down one’s scope and hamper the development.  Our society has been highly specification, which results in the lack of tolerance of differences between different culture, different ideas and different values, the lack of common sense, the lack of adaptabilities.  To be a versatile worker in the future and acquire a full development of personality, we need to source out from the outside.

To draw a conclusion, no one field of study could develop by itself, without the help from other areas of study. So, in light of this, we need general education to supplement our pursuit of one specific field of study.

jay_penny2005UID：203524

顶

wsdegUID：199069

希望互相讨论，加油！
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=319135

wxfhillUID：180140

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D101
请大家狠拍，谢谢！回拍！

wxfhillUID：180140

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D101
请大家狠拍，谢谢！回拍！

orange83UID：2127694

不好意思，这么晚才交，请多多原谅！！
Outline:
1.同意作者的观点
2.学科的发展方式，发展历史被局限，要跨越这个局限必须吸收外来知识。新学科单薄的背景不利于其发展，也需要吸收其他学科的长处
3.其他学科的介入，使本学科的人从另一个角度看问题，更有利于其学科的发展
4.总结，通过吸收其他学科的优点，或者与其他学科结合，使某个学科更好发展

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=320506

violayuanUID：2125310

https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthre ... p;page=1#pid1763291
outline:
1. 某些重大发现是由交叉学科引起的 eg:DNA结构的发现， 纳什均衡的提出
2. 但并非所有学科的每个进步都如此，因为各学科之间并非绝对的互生互促关系 eg: 文学与生物学的发展非直接相关，let alone……
3. 换言之， 一个学科的重大发展主要来自于学科内部：
   a,发展动力来自学科自身魅力和人类的好奇心对其不断探索
   b,学科内部理论创新也能引发学术革命
4. 另外， 重大进展往往取决于诸多因素：如资金，外部环境等等。而outsider只是其中之一

朽木白哉UID：195804

谢谢star的分析~~``

研究去了
=v=

[貌似不用占坑了啊]