- 最后登录
- 2009-7-9
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 4328
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-12-4
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 28
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1278
- UID
- 2164453

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 4328
- 注册时间
- 2005-12-4
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 28
|
I finished my final exams yesterday.I will try to accomplish all the task of our group and the Is and As I failed to render days ago. fighting together with you~~~
argument47 Scientists studying historical weather patterns have discovered that in the mid-sixth century, Earth suddenly became significantly cooler. Although few historical records survive from that time, some accounts found both in Asia and Europe mention a dimming of the sun and extremely cold temperatures. Either a huge volcanic eruption or a large meteorite colliding with Earth could have created a large dust cloud throughout Earth's atmosphere that would have been capable of blocking enough sunlight to lower global temperatures significantly. A large meteorite collision, however, would probably create a sudden bright flash of light, and no extant historical records of the time mention such a flash. Some surviving Asian historical records of the time, however, mention a loud boom that would be consistent with a volcanic eruption. Therefore, the cooling was probably caused by a volcanic eruption.
The arguer claims that the sudden cooling of the earth in the mid-sixth century was probably caused by a volcanic eruption. Firstly, the arguer assumed two possible causes: a large meteorite colliding or a volcanic eruption will result in the declining of the temperature of the earth. Sooner after, he denied the former. At last, drew a conclusion that the latter one was the right cause. However, the evidences the arguer provided , unfortunately, were not convincing to support his point of view.
One fundamental reason for the arguer is that some surviving Asian historical records of the time, mention a loud boom that would be consistent with a volcanic eruption which leads the cooling of the earth. With scrutiny of the conclusion we can find that there are not any evidences to relate a loud boom and a volcanic eruption. The loud boom, we can assume, may be caused by other reasons such as an earthquake as well as a flash. Therefore the correction of the historical records will be doubted. We can not easily say that volcanic eruption result in the cooling.
The arguer based an assumption that since there was no extant historical records of the time mention a flash, a large meteorite collision, although, would probably create a sudden bright flash of light, the declining of temperature had nothing with the meteorite collision. Nevertheless, it is also unconvincing. Firstly, no extant historical records exists now does not means no records existed before. It’ s possible that the useful records had been ruined or were not to be found out yet. Besides, a sudden colliding flash may not be seen by people eyes, the flashing place may out of people’s sight. Relevant evidences like whether human knew how to record or not also lack to support its argument.
At last, even if granted that a volcanic eruption did exist, we can not ensure that the declining of the temperature is directly caused by volcanic eruption. At one hand, if the declining happened before the eruption, it will not prove the relation between the two. On the other hand, other factors may be the main causes.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because of the evidence that the boom of the eruption and the denying of the meteorite colliding. |
|