Issue83 [infinity小组]第四次作业

mayaUID: 199038

Issue 83
"Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
提纲：作者认为即使遥远的地区也需要保护，我认为不能支持作者的全部观点
1、        保护自然环境是政府的义务，这对国家的经济、人民的健康都有帮助。如：美国的国家公园
2、        除了文化遗产、自然遗产同样宝贵
3、        一味的保护环境甚至那些遥远而与大多数人利益没有关系的自然地区，其保护应值得考虑
4、        结尾重述自己观点
The speaker confirms that preserving publicity owned wilderness areas in natural state is the government's obligation. I contend that a government should consider more natural events which are contracted to a nation's development. With the quick development of economy of the city, the natural wilderness should be even paid more attention. However, in my opinion, I believe that some extremely remote areas should not be preserved more in some cases. The reasons are given as follows.

A nation's development is relied on the progress of the economy of the whole country. When the power gained by one country, they should satisfy more for residents' health. The access to enable the government to comfort the citizens is consider about their health. Not only the government should consider their body health, but the spirit health. Providing clear and beautiful natural wilderness areas is the best way which can enhance the city to a higher step. Take developed countries as an example. After the quick development with economy, the government belonged to such these countries clearly realized that they ignore the environment problems in the progress of the economy. American government paid a highly attention to such this problem and constructed many national parks to preserve the areas which are not contaminated by the smoke of the city. Nowadays many countries preserve the wilderness areas as the American government did. In conclusion, the progress of the economy is important to one country, but the environment is also important with the health of the residents.

As all people know that the literature is the important remains by our ancestors, and it is also priceless with the natural remains. In today's world and based on a statistics institution, they showed that a number of 114 species are diminished in the earth. For example, some animals lived together with our ancestors are faced the bad environments by the quick economy development. And now we can never see them because we have not paid more attention our other friends. The old trees can give us information about the history about the earth and realize what ingredients the areas have. We human being is just a advanced level animal, we need nature and thus we should preserve wilderness areas.

However, must we preserve wilderness areas even though they are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people? In my opinion, we needn't do this. The reason is that our government cannot consider everything. They should consider affairs about the country's safe, economy, relationship among the world. Preserving wilderness areas is absolutely an important affair to government, but does it contain the remote and accessible to only few people? The government should consider more about these areas' reality. If they won't impact the country's residents or construction with the economy, the government can ignore it. After all, we cannot take care everything in this world.

To sum up, as the guider of one country, the government needs insightful inspection for the country's development. A natural wilderness area is one consideration. Because it has a relationship between human health and city's development the government should and must preserve these areas. But in some cases, they have no time to consider more about, such as the remote or inaccessible to majority areas. Through the above analysis, I consent the partly of the author's opinion that the government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas but not even though the areas which are extremely remote and just accessible to only a few people.

ashleyjrUID: 2206064

The speaker confirms that preserving publicity owned wilderness areas in natural state is the government's obligation. I contend that a government should consider more natural events which are contracted to a nation's development. With the quick development of economy of the city, the natural wilderness should be even paid more attention. However, in my opinion, I believe that some extremely remote areas should not be preserved more in some cases. The reasons are given as follows.

A nation's development is relied on the progress of the economy of the whole country. When the power is gained by one country, they should satisfy scarify? 如果要用“满意”之意，则satisfy residents’ health, 但觉得不太通~ more for residents' health. The access to enable the government to comfort the citizens is to consider about their health condition. Not only the government should提前 consider their body health, but the spirit health. Providing clear and beautiful natural wilderness areas is the best way 觉得用因果比较好，如：since it can enhance which can enhance the city to a higher levelstep. Take developed countries as an example. After the quick development withof economy, the government belonged to 不用such these countries clearly realized that they ignored the environment problems in the progress of the economy. American government paid a highly attention to such不这么用，this是重复上句中的同一个问题，而such是说这样的另一个问题such this problem and constructed many national parks to preserve the areas which are not contaminated by the smoke of cities, 因为是areas吧the city. Nowadays many countries preserve the wilderness areas as the American government did. In conclusion, the progress of the economy is important to one country, and so is the environment to the health of the residents.自造，觉得挺顺的~为了防止在一句中出现两个be important to but the environment is also important withto the health of the residents.

As all people know that 不用the literature is 应该也不用the important remains 缺动词by our ancestors, and it is also priceless with the natural remains. In today's world这个可以做插入语放在they前面，前后都加逗号的那种 and based on a statistics institution？investigation?, they showed that 不要，a number of means 一些，后面有具体数时不用a number of 114 species 应该用完成时，但是又太少了吧，一天114差不多are diminished in the earth. For example, some animals lived 不要，alice and jack live together. 而不是alice live together with jack.together with our ancestors are facingfaced the bad environments because of这是因果by the quick economy development. And now we can neverhardly see them because we have not paid much没有比较more attention on our other friends. 无特指不用theThe old trees can give us information about the history aboutof the earth and who realize? 只能说and make us realizerealize what ingredients thean areas have. We human beings isare just advanced animalsa advanced level animal, 两局之间没有连词we need nature and thus we should preserve wilderness areas.

However, must we preserve wilderness areas even though they are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people? In my opinion, we needn't do this. The reason is that our government cannot consider everything. They should consider affairs about the country's safety, economy, relationship with other countriesamong the world. Preserving wilderness areas is absolutely an important affair to government, but does it contain the remote and accessible to only few people? The government should consider more about these areas' reality. If they won't impact onthe country's residents or construction with the economy, the government can ignore it. After all, we cannot take care of everything in this world.

To sum up, as the guider of one country, the government needs insightful inspection for the country's development. A natural wilderness area is one consideration. Because it has a relationship between human health and city's development the government should and must preserve these areas. But in some cases, they have no time to consider more about, such as the remote or inaccessible to majority areas. Through the above analysis, I consent the partly of the author's opinion that the government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas but not even though the areas which are extremely remote and just accessible to only a few people.

语法错误较多，不知道还来不来得及~最好的办法是多读，不要读gre阅读，那个看半天也提高不了什么语感。看点适合自己的。时间不够的话，可以先写，但自己一定要在写完之后认真地看，上次出现的错误保证不要在下次中再出现。
特别注意你的介词短语经常用错，或者不加，或者不对，多总结吧：〉
关于内容，很汗~不介意的话请看看我的这篇issue吧，和你的思路算得上是完全相反，所以。。。。不知道到底该如何了，不过我的逻辑能力很差就是了~