issue17 Liquidshile--Hamming组 参考这完成了！流连互派

liquidshileUID: 2254332

“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.”

有保留的同意
1.正义与非正义是人的一种主观判断，没有一个真正固定的客观的标准，因此是不准确的。
2.多数情况下，法律能够满足广大人民群众的需要，这种法律我们就应该遵守。
3.反对非正义的法律有时候是正确的，但是很容易就会造成一种反作用，为犯罪开绿灯。
WORDS: 568  TIME: 1:00:00

Laws, body of official rules and regulations, generally found in constitutions as well as legislations and other like, which are used to regulate citizen’s behaviors and then enhance the stability of our society. Laws are made by legislature, their nature and functions have varied throughout history. The statement asserts that since laws are categorized as just and unjust ones, citizens are incumbent to obey just laws and disobey unjust laws. In my perspective, there is no reliable and uniform standard to distinguish just and unjust laws, this assertion is irrational because the statement neglect the significance of certain constancy in legal system.

Whether a law is just or not depends on people’s subjective views that differ according to personal interests, social backgrounds and personal value system. Consider, for example, the controversial issues about legitimacy of drug. For people in Netherlands, prohibiting open sale of cannabis is unjust, while for people of other districts cannabis business is evil, should be forbidden. Besides, divergence generated due to personal value, different or even opposite personal interests. For instance, certain laws forbid factories emitting polluted air and effluents into atmosphere or rivers for the well-being of local residents. In our eyes, this kind of law is just and considerate to public interests. However, as for the owner of factories, the laws, which lead to increase of costs and punishment, maybe regard as unjust. Consequently, it is difficult to make a clear line between just and unjust laws, to which type a law belongs should be determined on real social condition.

In most time, laws are founded base on interests of majority. It is our responsibility to obey these kinds of law, as a member of particular society or community. For example, law against crimes, help to maintain a peaceful, orderly, relatively stable society. Property and contract laws facilitate business activities and private planning. Laws also limit the powers of government and help to provide some level of freedom. Besides, Laws are used as a mechanism for the development of society, including inhibiting discrimination, improvement of individual life in matters of health, education and welfare. Therefore, we have the obligation to obey these kinds of laws.

Admittedly, it is natural for every decent citizen to criticize the unjust laws and find some peaceful way to modify them. An illustration is the movement led by Martin Luther King. He leaded his fellows to resist the unjust laws of the rights of black people. Nevertheless, consider so-called unjust laws from historical perspective, these laws indeed have their reasons to exist during a certain period of history or special social conditions. Some people suggest that we should be incumbent to take up responsibility to overthrow unjust laws. However, careful thinking this idea would reveals its naivety. As a matter of fact, by justifying a violation of unjust law, we might find ourselves on a slippery slope toward sanctioning all types of illegal and violent behaviors, like tax evasion and armed rebellions. Obviously, any course of action which threaten public security of life and property could find a well established excuse if every individual is allowed to disobey unjust laws in their own judgment.

In modern time, the inherent function of laws in democratic nations is to balance various interests. People with different values define the fairness of laws, disobedience is never justifiable when legal rights or the safety of innocent people is threatened as a result.

sisong2003UID: 2154005

issue17 Liquidshile--Hamming组参考这完成了！流连互派

“There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.”

有保留的同意

1.正义与非正义是人的一种主观判断，没有一个真正固定的客观的标准，因此是不准确的。

2.多数情况下，法律能够满足广大人民群众的需要，这种法律我们就应该遵守。

3.反对非正义的法律有时候是正确的，但是很容易就会造成一种反作用，为犯罪开绿灯。

WORDS: 568  TIME: 1:00:00

:)

Laws, body of official rules and regulations, generally found in constitutions as well as legislations and other like, which are used to regulate citizen’s behaviors and then enhance the stability of our society. Laws are made by legislature, their nature and functions have varied throughout history. The statement asserts that since laws are categorized as just and unjust ones, citizens are incumbent to obey just laws and disobey unjust laws. In my perspective, there is no reliable and uniform standard to distinguish just and unjust laws, this assertion is irrational because the statement neglects the significance of certain constancy in legal system.

:)

Whether a law is just or not depends on people’s subjective views that differ according to personal interests, social backgrounds and personal value system. Consider, for example, the controversial issues about legitimacy of drug. For people in Netherlands, prohibiting open sale of cannabis is unjust, while for people of other districts cannabis business is evil, should be forbidden. Besides, [besides就不应该再提及personal value]divergence generated due to personal value, different or even opposite personal interests. For instance, certain laws forbid factories emitting polluted air and effluents into atmosphere or rivers for the well-being of local residents. In our eyes, this kind of law is just and considerate to public interests. However, as for the owner of factories, the laws, which lead to increase of costs and punishment, maybe regard as unjust. Consequently, it is difficult to make a clear line between just and unjust laws, to which type a law belongs should be determined in real social condition.

:)

可以加一个连词Yet,感觉上下文联系强一点in most time, laws are founded base on interests of majority. It is our responsibility to obey these kinds of laws, as a member of particular society or community. For example, law against crimes, help to maintain a peaceful, orderly, relatively stable society. Property and contract laws facilitate business activities and private planning. Laws also limit the powers of government and help to provide some level of freedom. Besides, Laws are used as a mechanism for the development of society, including inhibiting discrimination, improvement of individual life in matters of health, education and welfare. Therefore, we have the obligation to obey these kinds of laws.

:)

Admittedly, it is natural for every decent citizen to criticize the unjust laws and find some peaceful way to modify them. An illustration is the movement led by Martin Luther King. He led his fellows to resist the unjust laws of the rights of black people.[好像没按提纲那样论证到好处,只说了nature,并且Martin Luther King的例子也不适于说明nature,更好地可以说什么后果,比如黑人权力得到改善] Nevertheless, consider so-called unjust laws from historical perspective, these laws indeed have their reasons to exist during a certain period of history or special social conditions. [感觉与后面不是很紧密,后面只说disobey会导致坏处,没说exist,如果作为过渡句,个人觉得有小小不妥]Some people suggest that we should be incumbent to take up responsibility to overthrow unjust laws. However, careful thinking this idea would reveals its naivety. As a matter of fact, by justifying a violation of unjust law, we might find ourselves on a slippery slope toward sanctioning all types of illegal and violent behaviors, like tax evasion and armed rebellions. Obviously, any course of action which threaten public security of life and property could find a well established excuse if every individual is allowed to disobey unjust laws in their own judgment.

:)

In modern time, the inherent function of laws in democratic nations is to balance various interests. People with different values define the fairness of laws, disobedience is never justifiable when legal rights or the safety of innocent people is threatened as a result. 这句感觉语法有问题,前半句主语是人,后面是反抗,并且没限制定语,比如disobedience of unjust laws

LZ最近狂下苦功,都看的出来,虽然被我糟蹋了一下,其实很佩服LZ,因为总体上说文章很厉害了

[ 本帖最后由 sisong2003 于 2007-1-14 21:57 编辑 ]

liquidshileUID: 2254332

谢谢修改！
谢谢表扬！
其实我最近超郁闷！