issue40 请大家挑毛病 发誓必回拍

gongzhenUID: 2230083

40T "Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."
对待学者和研究人员的评价不应该取决于他们的工作是否对整个社会有所贡献。而应该是看他们怎样为了自己的兴趣而奋斗，不管他们的兴趣看起来是多么不寻常或者多么特殊
TS 同意观点
1. 科学家的兴趣是第一位的,他们往往不知道自己的成果可能创造历史,
2.有些研究者的成果可能是价值不大的,但他们以自己的兴趣为出发点, 不会在乎别人的看法.
3.但是研究成果应当不危害社会,不能以自己的兴趣为借口

Whether the interest that scholars and researchers own, rather than faith that work can contribute to the larger society is more important? The answer, clearly, is interest, even it is unusual and idiosyncratic those interests may seem.

To begin with, we have to admit that interest is the most powerful impetus of research and exploration. Whatever a person born in upper-class, or lives in common-class, if only he or she has brevity to pursue their individual interests and insists on their goals, however illusion or unrealistic they are, they have evidenced their value. Just like Bill Gates, when he was a teenager, barely imagine his talent creativity will arise from a PC revolution and affect the whole world in the future 10 years. The only reason is he likes computer and wishes to employ it to deal with the problems he faces. However, his little interest changes the world and takes everyone further than before. Now, public overemphasize Bill' tremendous amount of wealth and contribution to world rather than his previously amazing experience. The process of pursuing individual interests actually fulfills unpredictable and unknown.

However, there are also countless scholars and researchers whose works have no or little value to the society, even their works are evidenced as mistaken theories and results by later people. Whether public should concentrate their works and approve their interests? There exists a example that can explain the phenomenon. As we all know, the Nobel Prize is the most authorized and influential prize that only identify the most notable scientists. In contrast, there is another "Nobel Prize" located in Harvard University every year which awards only the research results that they seem like be ridiculous and invaluable viewed by common public. For instance, why dose woodpecker not headache when it knocks the trunk about more than 10 thousand times per day? And the Mathematics Award is how many photos people will take at least in order to get one cooperated photo on that no one winks, and so forth. These researchers treat with the issues as the same importance as Nobel Prize. They also do a great deal of experiments and detailed surveys for these issues. Although the results seem like be unworthy discussing and cannot bring large social profit, in their eyes, these issues also stand for science and need be emphasized by them, nevertheless these issues are unusual and idiosyncratic. The kinds of awards take us humor; while at the same time give us some mediation.  What the scientists explore is a unknown frontier, which means they sometimes are not sure what they will discovery. Just rely on interests, they achieve their goals and continue to strike for their interests on the road of science. This kind of spirit teaches everyone how to question and research.

Finally, Individual interests should accord with the social ethnic and moral. Scholars and researchers cannot ignore their influence of work. For instance, some biologists attempt to clone the human beings to achieve their goals, regardless of other' objection and denouncement. Whatever their goal is based on the interests or other reasons, it must be prohibit At least, the works of scholars and researchers should not harm for the society.

To sum up, progress and development of human being are benefit from the interest and curiosity of human being themselves. No one dare imagine if all people lose the interest with the nature, universe, and circumstance around us, how the world will be like. Cherishing own interest and striking for it, however slight or great it is, you will be successful.

alex_leeUID: 2227596

Whether the interest that scholars and researchers own, rather than faith that work can contribute to the larger society is more important? The answer, clearly, is interest, even it is unusual and idiosyncratic those interests may seem. （建议加一点对理由的总括）

To begin with, we have to admit that interest is the most powerful impetus of research and exploration. Whatever a person born in upper-class, or lives in common-class (no matter which class a person belongs to), if only he or she has brevity to pursue their individual interests and insists on their goals, however illusion or unrealistic they (指代不明，the goal) are, they have evidenced  their value (values). Just like Bill Gates, when he was a teenager, barely imagine （imagined） his talent creativity （talent） will (would) arise from  (?) a PC revolution and affect the whole world in the future 10 years. The only reason is he likes computer and wishes to employ it to deal with the problems he faces. However, his little interest changes the world and takes everyone further than before. Now, public overemphasize Bill' tremendous amount of wealth and contribution to world rather than his previously amazing experience. （可以加一句， without the process for Gates to fulfill his individual interests, 会如何如何， 论证更充分一点） The process of pursuing individual interests actually fulfills unpredictable and unknown. (觉得你的例子是在支撑 individual interests change the world, 而不是这段第一句话)

However, there are also countless scholars and researchers whose works have no or little value to the society, even their works are evidenced as mistaken theories and results by later people. Whether public should concentrate their works and approve their interests? There exists a example that can explain the phenomenon. As we all know, the Nobel Prize is the most authorized and influential prize that only identify the most notable scientists. In contrast, there is another "Nobel Prize" located in Harvard University every year which awards only the research results that they seem like be ridiculous and invaluable viewed by common public. For instance, why dose woodpecker not headache when it knocks the trunk about more than 10 thousand times per day? And the Mathematics Award is how many photos people will take at least in order to get one cooperated photo on that no one winks, and so forth. These researchers treat with the issues as the same importance as Nobel Prize. They also do a great deal of experiments and detailed surveys for these issues. Although the results seem like be unworthy discussing and cannot bring large social profit, in their eyes, these issues also stand for science and need （to）be emphasized by them, nevertheless these issues are unusual and idiosyncratic. The kinds of awards take (bring) us humor; while at the same time give us some mediation (?).  What the scientists explore is a unknown frontier, which means they sometimes are not sure what they will discovery. Just rely on interests (?), they achieve their goals and continue to strike for their interests on the road of science. This kind of spirit teaches everyone how to question and research. (这一段行文没什么大问题，但是严重弱化了主题，for fun并不能支撑 pursuing individual interests is more important,  可以这样来写， 如果focusing on areas of research more likely to make a contribution, 有什么坏处)

Finally, Individual interests should accord with the social ethnic and moral. Scholars and researchers cannot ignore their influence of work. For instance, some biologists attempt to clone the human beings to achieve their goals, regardless of other' objection and denouncement. Whatever their goal is based on the interests or other reasons, it must be prohibit (why should clone be prohibited? 说一说)At least, the works of scholars and researchers should not harm for （多余） the society.

To sum up, progress and development of human being are benefit （benefited） from the interest and curiosity of human being themselves. No one dare imagine if all people lose the interest with the nature, universe, and circumstance around us (跑题了,题目并没有谈到这个啊), how the world will be like. Cherishing own interest and striking for it, however slight or great it is, you will be successful.

总结， 文章有一点跑题，没有论证为什么考虑individual interests 比 考虑 对社会做贡献 more important.
有些地方用词需要多斟酌

有空的话可以看看 lastangel 对我第一次写issue 的评价，我也是跑题了，他or她的点评不错


我文章链接：
第一稿 https://bbs.gter.net/thread-592897-1-2.html
第二稿 https://bbs.gter.net/thread-593489-1-1.html ，欢迎拍拍

rebecca0302UID: 2249779

issue40 请大家挑毛病 发誓必回拍

40T "Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."
对待学者和研究人员的评价不应该取决于他们的工作是否对整个社会有所贡献。而应该是看他们怎样为了自己的兴趣而奋斗，不管他们的兴趣看起来是多么不寻常或者多么特殊
TS 同意观点
1. 科学家的兴趣是第一位的,他们往往不知道自己的成果可能创造历史,
2.有些研究者的成果可能是价值不大的,但他们以自己的兴趣为出发点, 不会在乎别人的看法.
3.但是研究成果应当不危害社会,不能以自己的兴趣为借口

Whether the interest that scholars and researchers own, rather than faith that work can contribute to the larger society, is more important? The answer, clearly, is interest, even it is unusual and idiosyncratic those interests may seem. 第一段扣准题目 但没有明确的提出观点
To begin with, we have to admit that interest is the most powerful impetus of research and exploration. Whatever a person born in upper-class, or lives in common-class, if only he or she has brevity to pursue their individual interests and insists on their goals, however illusion or unrealistic they are, they have evidenced their value. Just like Bill Gates, when he was a teenager, barely imagine his talent creativity will arise from a PC revolution and affect the whole world in the future 10 years. The only reason is he likes computer and wishes to employ it to deal with the problems he faces. However, his little interest changes the world and takes everyone further than before. Now, public overemphasize Bill' tremendous amount of wealth and contribution to world rather than his previously amazing experience. The process of pursuing individual interests actually fulfills unpredictable and unknown.评兴趣学习能取得成功,用BILL的例子展开论证

However, there are also countless scholars and researchers whose works have no or little value to the society, even their works are evidenced as mistaken theories and results by later people. Whether public should concentrate their works and approve their interests? There exists a example that can explain the phenomenon. As we all know, the Nobel Prize is the most authorized and influential prize that only identify the most notable scientists. In contrast, there is another "Nobel Prize" located in Harvard University every year which awards only the research results that they seem like be ridiculous and invaluable viewed by common public. For instance, why dose woodpecker not headache when it knocks the trunk about more than 10 thousand times per day? And the Mathematics Award is how many photos people will take at least in order to get one cooperated photo on that no one winks, and so forth. These researchers treat with the issues as the same importance as Nobel Prize. They also do a great deal of experiments and detailed surveys for these issues. Although the results seem like be unworthy discussing and cannot bring large social profit, in their eyes, these issues also stand for science and need be emphasized by them, nevertheless these issues are unusual and idiosyncratic. The kinds of awards take us humor; while at the same time give us some mediation.  What the scientists explore is a unknown frontier, which means they sometimes are not sure what they will discovery. Just rely on interests, they achieve their goals and continue to strike for their interests on the road of science. This kind of spirit teaches everyone how to question and research. 但是也有对社会无用的例子

Finally, Individual interests should accord with the social ethnic and moral. Scholars and researchers cannot ignore their influence of work. For instance, some biologists attempt to clone the human beings to achieve their goals, regardless of other' objection and denouncement. Whatever their goal is based on the interests or other reasons, it must be prohibit At least, the works of scholars and researchers should not harm for the society. 个人兴趣应当和社会道德规律相一致

To sum up, progress and development of human being are benefit from the interest and curiosity of human being themselves. No one dare imagine if all people lose the interest with the nature, universe, and circumstance around us, how the world will be like. Cherishing own interest and striking for it, however slight or great it is, you will be successful结论.

总结
写得不错!文章语言流畅 例证充分展开 ,但是,文章脉络不大明确,开始紧扣题目 后来没有收尾点题
建议看看 着期的追星剑特训,了解怎样行文
加油哦 :)