issue51 Hamming小组,冲刺篇 教育只有设计满足个人需求才能最有效率

ScorpionSkyUID: 2273954

【题目】51."Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."
【翻译】教育只有被专门设计来满足每一个学生个人需求和兴趣的时候才是真正有效率的。

【论证】教育的效率体现在能以有限的教育资源让尽量多的人得到好的教育。教育的目的是使每个受教育者能得到充分的发展，满足个人需求与实现教育效率之间就是个人与大众利益的关系，在我看来，效率与目的应该保持平衡。


This assertion is apparently too absolutely, because the relationship, between individual desires within education and the efficiency of education, is considerable complexity. In other words, to satisfy individual’s needs and interests is the vital facet of the objective of education, while to assure most human beings’ opportunities of accessing education is the most significant expression of the efficiency of education. For my part, therefore, we need to clear the relationship and try our best to keep a balance between them two.
When it comes to the efficiency of education, many people might be have different comprehensions. At the same time, no one can deny the basic fact that to ensure the equal opportunity of every person is the vital mission of social education. Say, the first task of education is prefers to content common public education than to cater any individual. Moreover, education is correlation to the developmental level of economy. Consider, to United States, which has support of a strong economy, American education obviously is more effective than other counties due to that its citizens are easier accomplished their school works. On contrary, African, the continent that is struggling with poverty, is hard to establish sufficient amount of elementary schools. How should it to content its poor children’s interests and demands?
On the other hand, provided there is a mature condition, education is expected to improve individual full-blown. That demand it try its best to set free the educatees’ mind, in other word, do the best job to create more selective chances to satisfy their desires of learning. Just like universities’ works which usually designed of certain compulsory courses as well as gave some freedom of optional course. For example, I am major in computer science, but I selected an art course since painting is my favorite hobby. Not only selective course but the freedom of transferring majors is mirrored the objective of modern educational design, which enhanced its efficiency in turn.

Finally, there is a correlation between to content needs and interests of individual and to improve efficiency of education, educators had better keep the balance of them. More often or not, educators, even society as a whole, should pay no effort on both the two aspects at the same time. For instance, in October 1989, an excellent endeavor—Hope Project—was founded in Beijing, China, intend to aid the children who without educated chances for diverse reasons. Meanwhile, universities and colleges in China are undergoing the reforms in order to provide the maximum freedoms to the young students. It is not possible that education gives the absolute right to each student to only learns subjects he favorites, the unique obligation of education is to provide a relative free circumstance of progress.
To the sum, nowadays, education is not able to satisfy all needs and interests of individuals. Best of all, education could be keep a balance between its efficiency, which bringing the public opportunity of education for primarily task, and its objective, which endeavoring to provide freedom and to satisfy diverse learning demands of individuals.

ScorpionSkyUID: 2273954

为什么编辑一样的字出来这么难看!?

tomato217UID: 2126636

This assertion is apparently too absolutely, because the relationship, between individual desires within education and the efficiency of education, is considerable complexity. In other words, to satisfy individual’s needs and interests is the vital facet of the objective of education, while to assure most human beings’ opportunities of accessing education is the most significant expression of the efficiency of education. For my part, therefore, we need to clear the relationship and try our best to keep a balance between them two[del].
When it comes to the efficiency of education, many people might be[del] have different comprehensions[comprehension][about what?]. At the same time, no one can deny the basic[del, useless words] fact that to ensure[the form of ‘doing’ or noun sentence would be better] the equal opportunity of[for] every person [+to blablablabla…] is the vital mission of social education. Say, the first task of education is prefers[prefered] to content common public education than to cater any individual. Moreover, education is correlation to the developmental level of economy. Consider, to United States, which has support of a strong economy, American education obviously is more effective than other counties due to that its citizens are easier accomplished their school works. On contrary, African, the continent that is struggling with poverty, is hard to establish sufficient amount of elementary schools. How should it to content its poor children’s interests and demands?
On the other hand[del], provided there is a mature condition[what is ‘mature condition’?], education is expected to improve individual full-blown. That demand it[del] try[tries] its best to set free the educatees’ mind, in other word, do the best job[del] to create more selective chances to satisfy their[whose?] desires of learning. Just[, just] like universities’ works which[del] usually designed of certain compulsory courses as well as gave[given] some freedom of optional course[-s]. For example, I am major in computer science, but I selected an art course since painting is my favorite hobby. Not only selective course but the freedom of transferring majors[major transfer] is mirrored[mirrors] the objective of modern educational design, which enhanced its efficiency in turn.Finally, there is a correlation between to content needs and interests of individual and to improve efficiency of education,[+连接词] educators had better keep the balance of them[简洁：their balance]. More often or not, educators, even society as a whole, should pay no effort on both the two[del] aspects at the same time. For instance, in October 1989, an excellent endeavor—Hope Project—was founded in Beijing, China, intend[intending] to aid the children who without educated chances for diverse reasons[dropouts]. Meanwhile, universities and colleges in China are undergoing the reforms in order to provide the maximum freedoms[freedom] to the young students. It is not possible[impossible] that education gives the absolute right to[for] each student to only learns subjects he favorites, [.] the unique obligation of education is to provide a relative[-ly] free circumstance of progress.
To the sum[end], nowadays, education is not able to[防止重复：be not capable of=be not able to] satisfy all needs and interests of individuals. Best of all, education could be[del] keep a balance between its efficiency, which bringing[brings] the public opportunity of education for primarily task, and its objective, which endeavoring[endeavors] to provide freedom and to satisfy diverse learning demands of individuals.

ScorpionSkyUID: 2273954

修订版：

This assertion is apparently too absolutely, because the relationship, between individual desires within education and the effectiveness of education, is considerable complexity. In other words, to satisfy individual’s needs and interests is the vital facet of the objective of education, while to assure most human beings’ opportunities of accessing education is the most significant expression of the effectiveness of education. For my part, therefore, we need to clear the relationship and try our best to keep them balance.

When it comes to the effectiveness of education, many people might have different comprehension [about what?]. At the same time, no one can deny the fact that ensuring the equal opportunity for per person to obtain education is the vital mission of social education. Say, the first task of education prefers to content common public education than to cater any individual. Moreover, education is correlation to the developmental level of economy. Consider, to United States, in which education has support of a strong economy, American education obviously is more effective than other countries due to that its citizens are easier accomplished their school works. On contrary, Africa, the continent that is struggling with poverty, is hard to establish sufficient amount of elementary schools. How should it to content its poor children’s interests and demands?


On the other, provided there is a mature condition, say, with enough funding and instructive resources, education is expected to improve individual full-blown. That demands educators should try theirbest to set the educatees’ mind free, in other word, to create more selective chances to satisfy students’desires of learning, just like modern universities’ works which usually designed of certain compulsory coursesas well as given some freedom of optional courses. For example, I major in computer science, but I selected an art course since painting is my favorite hobby. Wherever necessary, that any student like me showed an eager need for knowledge, then there is an obverse opening choice. Not only selective courses arbitrarily but major transfer freely is mirrors the objective of modern educational design, which enhanced its effectiveness in turn.

Finally, there is a correlation between contenting needs and interests of individual and improving effectiveness of education, educators had better keep their balance but not go to extremes. More often then not, educators, even society as a whole, should spare no effort on both the two aspects at the same time. For instance, in October 1989, an excellent endeavor—Hope Project—was founded in Beijing, China, intendingto aid the chanceless children who without schooling[dropouts]. Meanwhile, universities and colleges in China are undergoing series of reforms which aim to provide the maximum freedom to the young students. It isimpossible that education gives the absolute right for each student to only learns subjects he favorites, [.] the unique obligation of education is to provide a relative[-ly] free circumstance for progress.

To the end, nowadays, education is not capable of=be not able to] satisfy all needs and interests of individuals. Best of all, education could be[del]严重警告自己 keep a well balance between its effectiveness , which bringing[brings] providing fair shows to the public for its primary task, and its objective, which endeavoring[endeavors] to provide more freedom and to satisfy diverse learning demands of individuals.



[ 本帖最后由 ScorpionSky 于 2007-1-30 11:31 编辑 ]

ScorpionSkyUID: 2273954

Project Hope was established to help those children out of school to raise tuition.