issue83 Hamming小组冲刺作业 保护偏远地区

ScorpionSkyUID: 2273954

83. "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
政府应该保留国家领土中公共拥有的荒凉地区，即使这些地区往往人迹罕至。

同意:
政府是应该保护这些地区的,因为他们存在潜在的危险可能会被怀有特殊目的的人首先侵占, 当政府发现问题严重时,可能已经损失惨重. 但政府的力量又是有限的, 所以应该合理的利用有限的财力和人力.
首先, 虽然公共拥有的许多荒凉地区人迹憨直, 但这不能保证那里对人类没有价值, 不管是环境,还是生态,都可能蕴涵着特殊的意义. 政府不能忽视这些地区, 因为很多这样的地区都受到潜在的危险. 也就是说，虽然人进憨直，但不代表没有人愿意去, 更不排除一些特殊目的的人早于政府侵入这些地区; 比如,中国的可可西里,,,
其次, 政府的能量是有限的, 有些沙漠地区, 面积非常大, 那里物种稀少, 气候严酷, 对于政府对于个人都没有直接的价值, 如果付出巨大的财力去保护, 会浪费资源. 但是另一方面, 这些地方有其科学考察的价值,比如发现石油,天然气等. 政府应该给予适当的关切.
欣慰的是，现在的政府已经逐步加强了着方面的意识和行动. 越来越多的自然保护区被建立, 越来越多的自然风景和生态环境得到保护.比如,palapla .并且，民间也有很多组织积极地协助政府完成这些工程, 所以,我们有理由相信这些地区会得到应有的保护.

The government should protect these publicly owned wilderness areas. There is a potential danger when certain prople who have a specific purpose might be the first invasion. When the government found problems become serious, there maybe have suffered heavy losses. However, the strength of the government is limited, so it should be a reasonable use of limited financial and human resources.

To begin with, as the speaker’s assertion, those areas maybe so wilderness as no more people willing to attach them. However, if those areas contain sorts of natural resources, such as wild animals, rare plants and so on,they will be subject to potentially dangerous  . In other words, commercial or other interests will render adventurers, who intend make money by hunting rarely wild animals, paying attention to those wildly areas. Consider, for example, Kekexili, one natural reserve among Tibetan Plateau,青藏高原,in China. At the late 20th century, few people know about the endangered situation of the rare Tibetan antelopes, even few people could access that place since the environment is too worse to survive. Until a journalist revealed the real story about the Mountain Patrol which members are all volunteers and most are local Tibetan, government and pubic began to pay close attention to it. But much many antelopes had been hunted, and more severely, the mountain patrol’s volunteers had paid a heavy price that nearly sacrificed all members.

Although measures are taking to make up sorts of lost, government often appears facing too much difficulties to preserve all those public owned wildly areas. After all, neither the finance or human resource, government is faced with quite shortages to implement their power to all those areas. On the one hand, a considerable portion of those wildly areas actually is not valuable to government concerning. For instance, Sahara Desert, a place really extreme wildly and severely lacks resources valuable to human, and it is too large to establish preserve area, thereby local government willing to spend money on any other place rather than pay for this valueless desert. On the other hand, there is a large number problems are more important comparing with those areas protection. In addition, those problems somewhat are able to influence those wildly areas. Global warming is a typical example illustrating this case, for many remote wildly places have been affected of it. Therefore, government had better take an appropriate measure to balance this case.

In fact, we are content to see that more and more natural preserves are established by governments, and there is an increasing awareness of protection about those remote areas’ environment. Public is also follow or even beyond government in action of protection with those areas and their natural resource. More often than not, those areas include many facets, like geology, animal, plants, glaciers, ecology and so on, are valuable to human beings. At the best, government is expected to pay enough attention to those public owned wildly areas, meanwhile, public happily to support our government—by diverse ways, devotion or participation directly.   

[ 本帖最后由 ScorpionSky 于 2007-2-1 16:06 编辑 ]

liquidshileUID: 2254332

83. "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
政府应该保留国家领土中公共拥有的荒凉地区，即使这些地区往往人迹罕至。同意:
政府是应该保护这些地区的,因为他们存在潜在的危险可能会被怀有特殊目的的人首先侵占, 当政府发现问题严重时,可能已经损失惨重. 但政府的力量又是有限的, 所以应该合理的利用有限的财力和人力.
首先, 虽然公共拥有的许多荒凉地区人迹憨直, 但这不能保证那里对人类没有价值, 不管是环境,还是生态,都可能蕴涵着特殊的意义. 政府不能忽视这些地区, 因为很多这样的地区都受到潜在的危险. 也就是说，虽然人进憨直，但不代表没有人愿意去, 更不排除一些特殊目的的人早于政府侵入这些地区; 比如,中国的可可西里,,,
其次, 政府的能量是有限的, 有些沙漠地区, 面积非常大, 那里物种稀少, 气候严酷, 对于政府对于个人都没有直接的价值, 如果付出巨大的财力去保护, 会浪费资源. 但是另一方面, 这些地方有其科学考察的价值,比如发现石油,天然气等. 政府应该给予适当的关切.
欣慰的是，现在的政府已经逐步加强了着方面的意识和行动. 越来越多的自然保护区被建立, 越来越多的自然风景和生态环境得到保护.比如,palapla .并且，民间也有很多组织积极地协助政府完成这些工程, 所以,我们有理由相信这些地区会得到应有的保护.

The government should protect these publicly owned wilderness areas. There is a potential danger when certain people who have a specific purpose might be the first invasion. When the government found problems become serious, there maybe have suffered heavy losses. However, the strength of the government is limited, so it should be a reasonable use of limited financial and human resources.

To begin with, as the speaker’s assertion, those areas maybe so wilderness as no more people willing to attach them. However, if those areas contain sorts of natural resources, such as wild animals, rare plants and so on, they will be subject to potentially dangerous . In other words, commercial or other interests will render adventurers, who intend make money by hunting rarely wild animals, paying attention to those wildly areas. Consider, for example, Kekexili, one natural reserve among Tibetan Plateau,青藏高原,in China.这个例子很好 At the late 20th century, few people know about the endangered situation of the rare Tibetan antelopes, even few people could access that place since the environment is too worse to survive. Until a journalist revealed the real story about the Mountain Patrol which members are all volunteers and most are local Tibetan, government and pubic began to pay close attention to it. [这个例子想的好没写好，你只说了volunteer没说偷猎分子，主要应该说偷猎分子！因为你的开头是dangerous people] But much many antelopes had been hunted, and more severely, the mountain patrol’s volunteers had paid a heavy price that nearly sacrificed all members. 还是没说brutal hunter, kill, armed……
你最后这几篇都有明显的优势，论证多，例子为论证服务，很好！这段论证的很好，就是例子写偏了

Although measures are taking to make up sorts of lost, government often appears facing too much difficulties to preserve all those public owned wildly areas. After all, neither the finance or human resource, government is faced with quite shortages to implement their power to all those areas. On the one hand, a considerable portion of those wildly areas actually is not valuable to government concerning. For instance, Sahara Desert, a place really extreme wildly and severely lacks resources valuable to human, and it is too large to establish preserve area, thereby local government willing to spend money on any other place rather than pay for this valueless desert. On the other hand, there is a large number problems are more important comparing with those areas protection.到这里应该说那些问题就完美了，在举一个例子：in Africa, there are more than 400 million people suffer famine， almost half of them are under 12 old age children.
在这里分段，要不然就和上边的一方面，另一方面两个对立观点冲突了！
这段长了不要出现In addition这样的话，这是另一个观点，我还是说一段一个观点，多写几段容易控制不跑题 In addition, those problems somewhat are able to influence those wildly areas. Global warming is a typical example illustrating this case, for many remote wildly places have been affected of it. Therefore, government had better take an appropriate measure to balance this case.

In fact, we are content to see that more and more natural preserves are established by governments, and there is an increasing awareness of protection about those remote areas’ environment. Public is also follow or even beyond government in action of protection with those areas and their natural resource. More often than not, those areas include many facets, like geology, animal, plants, glaciers, ecology and so on, are valuable to human beings. At the best, government is expected to pay enough attention to those public owned wildly areas, meanwhile, public happily to support our government—by diverse ways, devotion or participation directly.   
这样写也不错，就写两段还是挺清晰的


总体很好，有几个地方例子没有到位。