issue38 【076G－背水一战小组】jw84第三次作业

jw84UID: 2283839

Issue38
In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.

这篇文章感觉思路很乱，第三次作文，感觉比前两次还不好，突然就不会写了。

提纲：
1.反对作者观点。。
2.电视的优点。
3.电视的缺点。
4.书籍能更好的提供知识。
5.结尾。
  
  The speaker asserts that people can learn as much by watching television as by reading books and further concludes that reading books is not as important as it once was. I concede that television can provide more efficient and immediate information in some respects. However, I strongly claim that book is the best method of gaining knowledge.
  
  Admittedly, television has certain advantages over books for spreading information. On the one hand, the advanced technology of television provides us an express way to obtain the news. Nowadays, Cable and television network news reporting has largely supplanted newspapers for a simple reason that they can broadcast breaking news stories minutes after they occurred. On the other hand, television plays a unique role in providing the accurate and vivid images .As convincing as the truth, the television news shows every objective details of the events. Take Vietnam War for example; By the mid-1960s the Big Three networks were broadcasting daily images of the war into virtually every home in the United States. For many viewers, the horrors they saw on television were more significant than the optimistic reports of impending victory issued by government officials and repeated in print accounts. Thus, people can know the latest information by watching televison.
  
  However, watching television could not become a motivated way of learning.Firstly there may be something of a bit difference between information and knowledge. It is widely accepted that information implies a collection of facts while knowledge base on facts and ideas. Secondly, some characteristics of television stint the process of learning. For the one thing, the TV programs are so limited that they are hardly designed to meet the majority's needs and interets. Moreover, the time of program is fixed and people cannot arrange the learning according to their schedule. For the other thing, in order to have a high audience rating, the program should be easy and clear to be understanded by public. It is more likely that people have to receive the same knowledge regardless of their different backgrounds of education. In a word, people can learn a few passively by watching television.
  
  To the contrast, book is a top way of imparting the knowledge. In the first place, the book is capable of expressing unambiguously any concept that can be formulated in language. For instance, the physics theory usually contains some abstract concepts, and it is necessary to understand these concepts correctly in order to learn physics well. In the second place, books provide more space for the readers to image and reason. Take literature for example; As one old saying remarks: If there were 100 readers, there would be 100 kinds of Hamlets as well.A same novel to great degree,  can inspire people to generate different images according to their own reasoning thinking. In the third place, books allow people to read repeatedly. As learning is a constant process of gaining the knowledge, it is less likely that we can understand completely by reading once. Unlike the television, book is a more adaptive media for readers to use repeatedly. In the last place, book is a inexhaustible resource which is easy to share.Thus browsing in a library is such a pleasurable experience that people can enjoy reading comfortablely.
  
  In sum, people can learn more information by watching television, whereas if people want to gain useful knowledge, reading from books is a necessary way. the new media of television works as inferior substitutes for books when it comes to learning.

duduhahaUID: 2273118

The speaker asserts that people can learn as much by watching television as by reading books and further concludes that reading books is not as important as it once was. I concede that television can provide more efficient and immediate information in some respects. However, I strongly claim that book is the best method of gaining knowledge.
  
  Admittedly, television has certain advantages over books for spreading information. On the one hand, the advanced technology of television provides us an express way to obtain the news. Nowadays, Cable and television network news reporting has largely supplanted newspapers for a simple reason that they can broadcast breaking news stories minutes after they occurred. On the other hand, television plays a unique role in providing the accurate and vivid images .As convincing as the truth, the television news shows every objective details of the events. Take Vietnam War for example; By the mid-1960s the Big Three networks were broadcasting daily images of the war into virtually every home in the United States. For many viewers, the horrors they saw on television were more significant than the optimistic reports of impending victory issued by government officials and repeated in print accounts. Thus, people can know the latest information by watching televison.（看看能不能用种更好的方式表达？）
  
  However, watching television could not become a motivated way of learning.Firstly there may be something of a bit difference between information and knowledge. It is widely accepted that information implies a collection of facts while knowledge base on facts and ideas. Secondly, some characteristics of television stint the process of learning. For the one thing, the TV programs are so limited that they are hardly designed to meet the majority's needs and interets. Moreover, the time of program is fixed and people cannot arrange the learning according to their schedule. For the other thing, in order to have a high audience rating, the program should be easy and clear to be understanded by public. It is more likely that people have to receive the same knowledge regardless of their different backgrounds of education. In a word, people can learn a few passively by watching television.（看看  For the one thing 和 For the other thing的句子能否结合在一起，它们本身是用来阐述第二点的，又分开说似乎不太好）

  To the contrast, book is a top way of imparting the knowledge. In the first place, the book is capable of expressing unambiguously any concept that can be formulated in language. For instance, the physics theory usually contains some abstract concepts, and it is necessary to understand these concepts correctly in order to learn physics well. In the second place, books provide more space for the readers to image(imagine) and reason. Take literature for example; As one old saying remarks: If there were 100 readers, there would be 100 kinds of Hamlets as well.A same novel to great degree,  can inspire people to generate different images according to their own reasoning thinking. （这个激发想象空间例子挺好的）In the third place, books allow people to read repeatedly. As learning is a constant process of gaining the knowledge, it is less likely that we can understand completely by reading once. Unlike the television, book is a more adaptive media for readers to use repeatedly. 这样表达似乎有些累赘In the last place, book is a inexhaustible resource which is easy to share.Thus browsing in a library is such a pleasurable experience that people can enjoy reading comfortablely.
  
  In sum, people can learn more information by watching television, whereas if people want to gain useful knowledge, reading from books is a necessary(换个词吧） way. the new media of television works as inferior substitutes for books when it comes to learning.

我觉得你的论证过程没问题，但表达上应该多下些功夫，应该表现地更自然，条理性更好些。你可以去看看咱们组桐的文章，估计会有很多收获的。

SkysijieUID: 2233317

The speaker asserts that people can learn as much by watching television as by reading books and further concludes that reading books is not as important as it once was. I concede that television can provide more efficient and immediate information in some respects. However, I strongly claim that book is the best method of gaining knowledge.
  
  Admittedly, television has certain advantages over books for spreading information. On the one hand, the advanced technology of television provides us an express way to obtain the news. Nowadays, Cable and television network news reporting has largely supplanted newspapers for a simple reason that they can broadcast breaking news stories minutes after they occurred. On the other hand, television plays a unique role in providing the accurate and vivid images .As convincing as the truth, the television news shows every objective details(detail) of the events. Take Vietnam War for example; By the mid-1960s the Big Three networks were broadcasting daily images of the war into virtually every home in the United States. For many viewers, the horrors they saw on television were more significant than the optimistic reports of impending victory issued by government officials and repeated in print accounts. Thus, people can know the latest information by watching television.（这句话读着有点怪。。）
  
  However, watching television could not become a motivated way of learning. Firstly there may be something of a bit difference between information and knowledge. It is widely accepted that information implies a collection of facts while knowledge base on facts and ideas. Secondly, some characteristics of television stint the process of learning. For the one thing, the TV programs are so limited that they are hardly designed to meet the majority's needs and interest(interests). Moreover, the time of program is fixed and people cannot arrange the learning according to their schedule. For the other thing, in order to have a high audience rating, the program should be easy and clear to be understanded(understood by public. It is more likely that people have to receive the same knowledge regardless of their different backgrounds of education. In a word, people can learn a few passively by watching television.(你说的这些我都没有想到，继续学习中。。。。)
  
  To the contrast, book is a top way of imparting the knowledge. In the first place, the book is capable of expressing unambiguously any concept that can be formulated in language. For instance, the physics theory usually contains some abstract concepts, and it is necessary to understand these concepts correctly in order to learn physics well. In the second place, books provide more space for the readers to image and reason. Take literature for example; As one old saying remarks: If there were 100 readers, there would be 100 kinds of Hamlets as well. A same novel to great degree,  can inspire people to generate different images according to their own reasoning thinking. In the third place, books allow people to read repeatedly. As learning is a constant process of gaining the knowledge, it is less likely that we can understand completely by reading once(这句话能不能该简洁点？？). Unlike the television, book is a more adaptive media for readers to use repeatedly.(没有说电视在这方面的作用，怎么用unlike??) In the last place, book is a inexhaustible resource which is easy to share.Thus browsing in a library is such a pleasurable experience that people can enjoy reading comfortablely（comfortable）.
  
  In sum, people can learn more information by watching television, whereas if people want to gain useful knowledge, reading from books is a necessary（这个词用这儿不对吧？） way. the new media of television works as inferior substitutes for books when it comes to learning.
（论证倒是没什么问题，苛刻一下，lz在每段论证的时候都用一个论点分几方面说，能不能换种方式来表达？？呵呵。。。。）