寄托天下
查看: 1207|回复: 2

[i习作temp] ISSUE38 飞跃小组disyoo第二次作业 我能闻到进步的气息,你呢? [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
495
注册时间
2006-6-23
精华
0
帖子
4
发表于 2007-2-25 20:13:26 |显示全部楼层
TOPIC: ISSUE38 - "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."
WORDS: 472          TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2007-2-25

提纲:
1.+看电视能弥补阅读速度慢的缺点,并且可以更快摄取信息。:kiss:
2.+电视的表现形式更加生动 变枯燥的文字为活动的画面 更加易懂
3.- 电视与其说是用来学习的 不如说是人们娱乐和消磨时光的工具 他不能取代书的地位。

Is reading books not as important as it once was? The speaker claims so, for the reason that people can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. I fundamentally agree that, TV has make the proceeds of learning easier than before, and further more, because of using TV which holds more information than book does, we can learn much more than early time.

First, the amount of information which TV shows to audience in day and night is far more than that reading from books. A survey on the newspaper of my university which is based on our university shows that the reading speed of students in arrange is 500 more Chinese words per minute  if one is reading a technology paper, and it will take 2 or 3 days to read over the paper by this speed. But if the paper is recorded into a TV program with experiment and explain speaker in it, it will take only 2 hours to understand the article because it holds much more information in the TV program per minute than reading does. So TV helps us to get more through the fast information showing.

Further more, the TV program can be easily accepted for TV changes the words into alive pictures. The way a TV program showing is by video and audio, and what is more, the information which the TV program collected often shows like a story, and this kind of media is named as movie. To learn history one should read hundreds of books in different time; however, it is possible to learn a piece of history by watching a movie in several hours. For example, the history from D-Day to the end of World War II is recorded into many books, but a movie named Band of Brother performs that in only 10 hours. So TV makes the doll knowledge into living one.

In another hand, TV is not mainly used for learning; people in more time use it as a tool for having fun or even for time-killing. The TV program which is showed from TV station has less uses for learning, unlike books. For example, the programs will not exclude from news, advertisement, singing or dancing performance, movies or cartoon, etc. Further more; there is only a small amount of programs which are designed for study, for example the Discory and National Geography. So the TV is used for enjoyment rather than studying, and therefore, it is impossible to say that reading book is less important as it once was, where we mainly learn is from books.

In sum, as the time TV is absorbed into our life, we have learn more and easier than before, but TV is still a tools for fun and killing time, it will never take place of reading.
凡是贵在坚持
成功源于心态
…………………

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
22
寄托币
592
注册时间
2007-1-3
精华
0
帖子
17
发表于 2007-2-25 22:43:00 |显示全部楼层
TOPIC: ISSUE38 - "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."
WORDS: 472          TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2007-2-25

提纲:
1.+看电视能弥补阅读速度慢的缺点,并且可以更快摄取信息。:kiss:
2.+电视的表现形式更加生动 变枯燥的文字为活动的画面 更加易懂
3.- 电视与其说是用来学习的 不如说是人们娱乐和消磨时光的工具 他不能取代书的地位。

Is reading books not as important as it once was? The speaker claims so, for the reason that people can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. I fundamentally agree that, TV has make the proceeds of learning easier than before, and further more, because of using TV which holds more information than book does, we can learn much more than early time.

First, the amount of information which TV shows to audience in day and night is far more than that reading from books. A survey on the newspaper of my university which is based on our university shows that the reading speed of students in arrange is 500 more Chinese words per minute  if one is reading a technology paper, and it will take 2 or 3 days to read over the paper by this speed. But if the paper is recorded into a TV program with experiment and explain speaker in it, it will take only 2 hours to understand the article because it holds much more information in the TV program per minute than reading does. So TV helps us to get more through the fast information showing.

Further more, the TV program can be easily accepted for TV changes the words into (alive)lively pictures. The way a TV program showing is by video and audio, and what is more, the information which the TV program collected often shows like a story, and this kind of media is named as movie. To learn history one should read hundreds of books in different time; however, it is possible to learn a piece of history by watching a movie in several hours. For example, the history from D-Day to the end of World War II is recorded into many books, but a movie named Band of Brother performs that in only 10 hours. So TV makes the doll knowledge into living one.

In another hand, TV is not mainly used for learning; people in more time use it as a tool for having fun or even for time-killing. The TV program which is showed from TV station has less uses for learning, unlike books. For example, the programs will not exclude from news, advertisement, singing or dancing performance, movies or cartoon, etc. Further more; there is only a small amount of programs which are designed for study, for example the Discory and National Geography. So the TV is used for enjoyment rather than studying, and therefore, it is impossible to say that reading book is less important as it once was, where we mainly learn is from books.

In sum, as the time TV is absorbed into our life, we have learn more and easier than before, but TV is still a tools for fun and killing time, it will never take place of reading.


正如楼主所说,进步明显哦,感觉大体上没什么问题,而且我跟楼主的思路也比较接近,其他就没什么好说了。但也要看到这篇确实比较好写,再遇到难题可能会又感觉退步,加油吧!
Just do it

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
3259
注册时间
2006-10-17
精华
0
帖子
29
发表于 2007-2-26 13:19:11 |显示全部楼层
Is reading books not as important as it once was? The speaker claims so, for the reason that people can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. I fundamentally agree that, TV has make the proceeds of learning easier than before, and further more, because of using TV which holds more information than book does, we can learn much more than early time.

First, the amount of information which TV shows to audience in day and night is far more than that reading from books. A survey on the newspaper of my university which is based on our university shows that the reading speed of students in arrange is 500 more Chinese words per minute  if one is reading a technology paper, and it will take 2 or 3 days to read over the paper by this speed. But if the paper is recorded into a TV program with experiment and explain speaker(解说员?这个表达不地道) in it, it will take only 2 hours to understand the article because(换着用since/in that) it holds much more information in the TV program per minute than reading does. So TV helps us to get more through the fast information showing.


Further more, the TV program can be easily accepted for TV changes the words into alive pictures. The way a TV program showing is by video and audio, and what is more, the information which the TV program collected often shows like a story, and this kind of media is named as movie. To learn history one should read hundreds of books in different time; 不定式开头,好~句式多样起来了~however, it is possible to learn a piece of history by watching a movie in(within) several hours. For example, the history from D-Day to the end of World War II is recorded into many books, but a movie named Band of Brother performs that in only 10 hours. So TV makes the doll(dull!) knowledge into living one.

(用个转折词逻辑会更清晰)In another hand, TV is not mainly used for learning; people in more time use it as a tool for having fun or even for time-killing. The TV program which is showed from TV station has less uses for learning, unlike books. For example, the programs will not exclude from news, advertisement, singing or dancing performance, movies or cartoon, etc. Further more; there is only a small amount of programs which are designed for study, for example the Discory and National Geography. So the TV is used for enjoyment rather than studying, and therefore, it is impossible to say that reading book is less important as it once was, where we mainly learn is from books.

In sum, as the time TV is absorbed into our life, we have learn more and easier than before, but TV is still a tools for fun and killing time, it will never take place of(应该是take the place of) reading.

我也闻到了你进步的气息,呵呵~
看来你的海量训练法确实是很有效的呢,gxgx~
语言流畅多了,加油~
我怎么这么坚强啊!!!

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE38 飞跃小组disyoo第二次作业 我能闻到进步的气息,你呢? [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE38 飞跃小组disyoo第二次作业 我能闻到进步的气息,你呢?
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-615907-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部