- 最后登录
- 2012-5-30
- 在线时间
- 6 小时
- 寄托币
- 4973
- 声望
- 17
- 注册时间
- 2001-5-24
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 帖子
- 75
- 精华
- 28
- 积分
- 3732
- UID
- 103396
   
- 声望
- 17
- 寄托币
- 4973
- 注册时间
- 2001-5-24
- 精华
- 28
- 帖子
- 75
|
略读内容集合
* C% l) X9 Z V# A% s7 A$ B2 ^ - \! @# U( ^: l' @5 f4 t
略读,并不是说不读,而是快速的读,读不懂得不用逗留,更不用反复琢磨猜测不认识的单词,但是一定要注意的就是,值得做标记的一定要给出标记,以方便定位!
" b# ?; ~, E( ?/ A' \: R' w5 K1. 作者摒弃的观点的论据和论证,这样的观点一般都是为后面作者支持的观点做铺垫,有个现象,作者一上来就给出正确解释多没意思哦,要一波三折,起起伏伏这样才有趣嘛,所以很多时候,ETS通常先给出一个或者若干个最后要被摒弃的解释,还用一堆话来论证,这部分因为不是文章的重点,所以通常也不是考点,故完全可以略读。
" y+ n5 \0 w3 r3 b4 o$ N0 c& k2 M例:P6长L4——L11 l4 w' H5 f0 y3 U0 S$ x, Z9 C) V
Two main kinds of answers have been offered. One is couched in terms of advantage to population. It is argued that the sex ratio will evolve so as to maximize the number of meetings between individuals of the opposite sex.This is essentially a "group selection" argument. The other, and in my view correct, type of answer was first put forward by Fisher in 1930.; b3 U7 z4 \/ S/ }
. I, |! O$ e! N
P64长L27——32
7 l" {' K! L) R @+ SAccording to this theory, it is not the quality of the sensory nerve sations they produce, but rather the different areas of the brain into which they discharge, and there is some evidence for this view.
' z4 I, O8 `% V/ G& g$ n) A( y
' r, U) f2 L) {: b( V7 iP83短L14——完
; p' l* C0 s5 Q+ X! ZAlthough some experiments show that, as an object becomes familiar, its internal representation becomes more holistic and the recognition process correspondingly more parallel, the weight of evidence seems to support the serial hypothesis, at least for objects that are not notably simple and familiar.
& W4 ~. b4 o9 D# v( w7 ]9 c& h) O4 B6 j" ]& s D8 ?, i
2. 反之亦然的观点,这类观点其实是对上文累赘的重复,因为完全可以用vice versa来替代,所以完全可以不读,只要稍用大脑就可以知道它在讲什么。
: j$ p1 E# Y; k) {& s. D9 T例:P6长L17——L216 S8 y: n3 ]. K$ M4 p) J @
Suppose that the population consisted mostly of females: then an individual who produced sons only would have more grandchildren. In contrast, if the population consisted mostly of males, it would pay to have daughters.$ f" \! B. a0 z' L7 ?( ]) l
7 @7 I3 N J- w) P& O( S' x- ^% i% d
3. 已知大意的详细叙述可以略读- x z X4 X0 `& H
3 Q9 D, f, ~- `; D& z 反复读一下首句和各段首句,看看自己能不能明白作者要写的内容,文章大意,各段大意呢?如果能的话,各段的具体内容,可以略读,但是一些必要做出标记的的还是要给标记。
5 L# j" {0 R7 Q9 O1 N+ g- |2 f例:P33长全文
7 `( P# }; m* H- B+ v% s; a- [2 s"I want to criticize the social system, and to$ k. i8 Y( o; A6 i g
show it at work, at its most intense." Virginia: G: c6 H) Y. R* K _! y% @5 U
Woolf's provocative statement about her inten-' E6 o; x$ J5 z% L Z
tions in writing Mrs. Dalloway has regularly
- v2 }* S4 \$ R/ c% s) @(5) been ignored by the critics, since it highlights an1 o {; J2 `( z! h# y. h; i/ v
aspect of her literary interests very different from1 d; V( E% v# t5 I" W. r3 ~4 t t
the traditional picture of the "poetic" novelist! w) C0 t G. ^# u- h. D% U
concerned with examining states of reverie and
7 T' x- Y4 x. w; J/ Xvision and with following the intricate pathways
?, ~2 M6 U v" U( p(10) of individual consciousness. But Virginia Woolf. `' x% l2 r8 B. f( x
was a realistic as well as a poetic novelist, a9 B" p7 S: ^2 E/ H$ U! K
satirist and social critic as well as a visionary:. j* K6 @3 q5 X' I/ T
literary critics' cavalier dismissal of Woolf's% I: \ h. {* w- a
social vision will not withstand scrutiny.
/ p0 N I$ F6 Q4 R' q+ z(15) In her novels, Woolf is deeply engaged by the
+ f0 t# y" a" `" g4 Rquestions of how individuals are shaped (or de-
3 r) V; r: w$ a" ]: D$ \6 x) Tformed) by their social environments, how6 V4 X, l& S0 @0 T$ C( K& q
historical forces impinge on people's lives, how
; O& J7 F# h% X4 z* Y; ^! x( Mclass, wealth, and gender help to determine
6 b! Q" |6 F g( r. s% Q# d, q(20) people's fates. Most of her novels are rooted in a
4 ]/ b: `! i4 z. v* R5 i: Srealistically rendered social setting and in a1 o ]. u3 K8 b3 V x/ M/ ~
precise historical time.3 G* ]3 l) w" r, X# |
Woolf's focus on society has not been gener-
3 ? a$ K0 \$ i6 B/ j& oally recognized because of her intense antipathy
2 y6 r3 J, @+ y- z( t(25) to propaganda in art. The pictures of reformers
. H8 ]" C/ T+ T2 Pin her novels are usually satiric or sharply
- j6 l( E. ?$ O$ f! L3 s& bcritical. Even when Woolf is fundamentally
7 E2 R" S% x/ |' i7 |sympathetic to their causes, she portrays people
( f( }8 n: Y/ _% `+ ]! K \anxious to reform their society and possessed of
5 J, n/ f1 }1 n A(30) a message or program as arrogant or dishonest,- \2 j3 E" W* r7 W, q
unaware of how their political ideas serve their1 g2 b5 b. i1 {+ i/ G/ Y/ u0 q1 Y
own psychological needs. (Her Writer's Diary
. b3 N3 e& B, a. Y8 V0 x( l- H8 @1 Qnotes: "the only honest people are the artists,"$ B. V* Z# G4 t7 I& R. c4 t6 L
whereas "these social reformers and philan-- @/ N) p% B! v( o) c" Q; s2 p
(35) thropists...harbor... discreditable desires
1 [; |* ]5 d% v) Hunder the disguise of loving their kind....")
* W8 I4 G0 f1 ?Woolf detested what she called "preaching"
! i7 e8 t3 p; A) v7 ^) H. y' Kin fiction, too, and criticized novelist: P7 Z. V0 x/ y0 p5 P1 W
D.H. Lawrence (among others) for working by
7 s% x, a& V, H* r( i) S6 p(40) this method.
2 U$ B& s3 m+ n1 K" A/ NWoolf's own social criticism is expressed in
+ ~: w- A# W: d9 N3 B2 |the language of observation rather than in direct" ^) O+ S7 ~# Y1 j/ t9 ?% V
commentary, since for her, fiction is a contem-
) B, j! w4 |( T) x0 Hplative, not an active art. She describes phenom-
( @, H$ A" Y1 ]7 F0 {2 E- l- [- q(45) ena and provides materials for a judgment about
+ g& V! x+ R* B1 _& jsociety and social issues; it is the reader's work
9 F8 F! E9 T$ G5 n$ b$ \0 l( cto put the observations together and understand
9 v# d7 V2 D: ?- M k! H' U$ \/ qthe coherent point of view behind them. As a p# e# c( [ s4 l% n2 E8 d5 s h
moralist, Woolf works by indirection, subtly
* l2 W a- I7 F(50) undermining officially accepted mores, mocking,
; {3 ]5 \: n4 Esuggesting, calling into question, rather than
' D5 Y" `% ]+ E. `8 f* X. Yasserting, advocating, bearing witness: hers is+ |2 }) C, M( H4 N
the satirist's art.
+ @/ u+ B' W9 @2 IWoolf's literary models were acute social ob-
, A* \3 I9 b7 U- E# y" e(55) servers like Checkhov and Chaucer. As she put it5 v& w" G* D3 B; d. N
in The Common Reader. "It is safe to say that
: K: J1 t' y3 _) F( ?not a single law has been framed or one stone set1 }) V/ `& R0 i
upon another because of anything Chaucer said% O! \- X- I' [: t. E; R8 y
or wrote; and yet, as we read him, we are absorb-5 e) F T* p: B: W, [# g& h
(60) ing morality at every pore." Like Chaucer,: i* p" n- ?2 B8 z" @3 W$ x
Woolf chose to understand as well as to judge,
1 `8 ^' p* _2 v- gto know her society root and branch-a decision
/ E0 k$ {/ X8 ]2 O3 ncurcial in order to produce art rather than
# c0 s* |1 b5 O+ \polemic.
! W# O( I% e$ }+ v" k, K
" X; Z+ Z2 e$ b: R* yP47长全文
- Q0 f/ X. x! g5 _8 L6 n uIn his 1976 study of slavery in the United% t8 N7 T8 [" ^" F
States, Herbert Gutman, like Fogel, Engerman,
2 N" e+ |/ b8 Q F" V# u5 S' Yand Genovese, has rightly stressed the slaves'
* k# o' a2 Z3 u0 Y9 Machievements. But unlike these historians, Gut-
5 a0 b! g7 t3 M! m(5) man gives plantation owners little credit for
( ~7 M( x! R* j; Q! _these achievements. Rather, Gutman argues that
q2 r; Z$ ?0 _( fone must look to the Black family and the
4 @# _/ L' c/ G q& \3 r k# Mslaves' extended kinship system to understand( V6 I2 w( C# z/ }% @0 ?# X* K
how crucial achievements, such as the mainte-
) i# q' q+ R2 K3 Q8 t3 ^(10) nance of a cultural heritage and the develop-
4 P& z( w1 N; C) [: V7 \: ament of a communal consciousness, were
* s( S1 ]; U1 E% @possible. His findings compel attention.
F9 z+ _/ @: w2 }Gutman recreates the family and extended! |' Q- G9 U! b# c9 P2 M
kinship structure mainly through an ingenious- y& v& ]/ d: a* s- m: J) ~
(15) use of what any historian should draw upon,3 ^: a: m+ I# r9 I1 k
quantifiable data, derived in this case mostly
( z! F5 w6 x; ufrom plantation birth registers. He also uses
9 U O7 j, d) v3 Maccounts of ex-slaves to probe the human reality+ D. x/ v% p8 L/ R% f7 W
behind his statistics. These sources indicate that) z2 J, q4 J) Q. N0 E3 ~
(20) the two-parent household predominated in slave+ E2 x, G9 B6 k( Y
quarters just as it did among freed slaves after
9 z; f7 r# ]2 j( V/ femancipation. Although Gutman admits that1 }# \. X: F- P4 }4 _& j
forced separation by sale was frequent, he shows8 [5 t) G! H( _) W! {, x! [' D# B
that the slaves' preference, revealed most clearly: c' P2 P, c4 h9 x' F
(25) on plantations where sale was infrequent, was" u+ e0 m E4 d7 {8 l/ c5 @+ O3 {
very much for stable monogamy. In less con-
: F- y5 p; E. d# `clusive fashion Fogel, Engerman, and Genovese' O. K9 G& ~2 D6 F# k
had already indicated the predominance of two-% t$ o/ Z) {' Y+ N, A1 a6 n$ M
parent households; however, only Gutman
0 `7 M6 t8 Y( w, I; W( F" x% \(30) emphasizes the preference for stable monogamy! l4 s: R' w* J
and points out what stable monogamy meant for
; p/ H1 X! |9 Y! r# e, Ythe slaves' cultural heritage. Gutman argues
$ v2 i! Y" g' \* C2 E1 `+ E6 Zconvincingly that the stability of the Black% e" b' {6 K8 X* ?& c) `, U
family encouraged the transmission of-and so9 [" n# o4 B+ z
(35) was crucial in sustaining-the Black heritage of5 l6 y8 G* c" T+ e
folklore, music, and religious expression from
" M6 B; C5 E6 u9 z3 hone generation to another, a heritage that slaves; k. c% a: A7 x$ r& a9 B
were continually fashioning out of their African% Z1 M0 ?6 t0 C6 R7 o. A
and American experiences.3 c' i2 ?( n' R% s' w8 A" a, t
(40) Gutman's examination of other facets of- V" J- C6 b; B/ E) d
kinship also produces important findings./ t5 G/ B! n4 |
Gutman discovers that cousins rarely married,
6 A3 u0 I& H3 Nan exogamous tendency that contrasted sharply1 `" B3 c% a' t% `' Q3 Y4 H% N$ \
with the endogamy practiced by the plantation2 H8 G2 P0 Q2 o2 g
(45) owners. This preference for exogamy, Gutman
% D: Q+ J) b9 u2 F- c6 hsuggests, may have derived from West African4 H! r& v, V2 t3 h* \. z
rules governing marriage, which, though they
0 l$ w# X$ v/ c t1 T7 Udiffered from one tribal group to another, all# a0 l- t, F/ i& K0 R% ?
involved some kind of prohibition against* t& |! f- m1 u4 ^& q
(50) unions with close kin. This taboo against
, V/ a5 C, Z* P. ~3 @cousins' marrying is important, argues Gutman,
( D6 @' B' R9 d: x3 F3 tbecause it is one of many indications of a strong
+ }( n: v/ l& a5 y# G5 qawareness among slaves of an extended kinship2 g# c* b" _$ d9 Q
network. The fact that distantly related kin- B, T/ S) p% H
(55) would care for children separated from their
4 ]4 G( [8 \' p5 A+ h! bfamilies also suggests this awareness. When
5 E* s$ A' C6 O" g7 |blood relationships were few, as in newly created7 M% w: l. E3 t% q' R0 |
plantations in the Southwest, "fictive" kinship
) y' f! J; d4 `arrangements took their place until a new
# S: w, T% f/ O. @- ](60) pattern of consanguinity developed. Gutman
6 ]5 S5 o4 k$ S5 ypresents convincing evidence that this extended
0 v* [8 `% c0 J. fkinship structure-which he believes developed4 F& H3 N, r( N8 D( G
by the mid-to-late eighteenth century-provided8 x7 |5 W. d% G$ N% D* y
the foundations for the strong communal con-
! F& l! A3 i( V7 g. d% b+ W(65) sciousness that existed among slaves.
3 \8 T, G. V: W9 f9 ? qIn sum, Gutman's study is significant because
9 u0 d! H/ r# ]: R0 C7 Wit offers a closely reasoned and original explan-( U; X9 p0 l5 J3 L' o* w
ation of some of the slaves' achievements, one+ ]. x/ g- u2 ?; I! |& j, A
that correctly emphasizes the resources that
1 h" Y8 \2 @* l' ]' sslaves themselves possessed.' ^1 ]9 e, ?5 p
; n: e# u- i. S7 s; r" \* M! ^P83短L6-14( B! P8 Q! r9 @7 C
Controversy surrounds the question of whether recognition is a parallel, one-step process or a serial, step-by-step one. Psychologists of the Gestalt school maintain that objects are recognized as wholes in a parallel procedure: the internal representation is matched with the retinal image in a single operation. Other psychologists have proposed that internal representation features are matched serially with an object's features.3 g% p9 I7 B5 T4 r$ y- y
" O4 ?. |& J! x. d4 C, t9 PP83长二、三段
( O; f2 w& i {: {6 L. J! R/ ]Starting from the premise that mythology and legend4 |) O l- {, M
preserve at least a nucleus of historical fact, Bachofen
: ~) f8 ]8 b. j* }' ~( z4 t; Aargued that women were dominant in many ancient soci- Z) h, `: Z; S# L7 |
eties. His work was based on a comprehensive survey of
4 w/ X2 \3 T4 j6 G! N+ y. Areferences in the ancient sources to Amazonian and
; t$ C6 ~' s; c6 Yother societies with matrilineal customs—societies in
0 v; b3 p! p2 _7 D; qwhich descent and property rights are traced through the
* s9 O9 |. k% D+ rfemale line. Some support for his theory can be found in
4 P. A# F8 t4 Y& `) Devidence such as that drawn from Herofotus, the Greek
/ u2 a8 J: j1 ^/ C# {8 C# ]5 J8 _"historian" of the fifth century B. C. who speaks of an: N% z1 G/ d; D
Amazonian society, the Sauromatae, where the women
+ y' V I8 x, s8 bhunted and fought in wars. A woman in this society was
/ j4 E ~+ r/ @* O- `not allowed to marry until she had killed a person in
& n. I/ ]$ o9 L$ Kbattle." b; j" X4 ]4 r- J( X4 F3 _& f9 }1 S
Nonetheless, this assumption that the first recorders of
: u/ s# e j" l2 F9 r4 eancient myths have preserved facts is problematic. If one
* L5 v/ j' I3 L$ H3 ~. {, z' p Hbegins by examining why ancients refer to Amazons, it
: F& Z- j: e/ N4 Pbecomes clear that ancient Greek descriptions of such' i9 B9 ~% B2 @) ?/ T
societies were meant not so much to represent observed& Q2 @7 ~* I: g) n/ p0 T
historical fact—real Amazonian societies—but rather to
' T# s, p/ E! d7 W: ?offer "moral lessons" on the supposed outcome of
+ i. P! c+ }1 x( P6 \, Y! d/ o/ o& m0 k% }women's rule in their own society. The Amazons were
! u. U+ S" P! _+ e0 R% E$ s+ Uoften characterized, for example, as the equivalents of
/ Z5 T3 z* S" c& d' X$ M% O+ rgiants and centaurs, enemies to be slain by Greek heroes.
& }2 ]2 Z6 _/ LTheir customs were presented not as those of a respect-
1 Q( n1 V5 L7 }% u9 X! `$ w% o0 Table society, but as the very antitheses of ordinary Greek
, a9 L3 c' G" \practices. S' E0 C7 ^( H7 I6 w0 x( |5 D
9 A( k7 h/ R) {
P86长全文2 }. Z8 S1 ~) R& u" u5 Z5 n) _
We can distinguish three different realms of matter,
: `( c! k+ y) e8 Ythree levels on the quantum ladder. The first is the
; ]# {1 Z; T. e- n" aatomic realm, which includes the world of atoms, their/ Z5 w% [2 D; x# k. }
interactions, and the structures that are formed by them,
# N/ ~3 _, w" y' A4 `(5)such as molecules, liquids and solids, and gases and plas-
# [: ^3 k* T4 {, K. G4 cmas. This realm includes all the phenomena of atomic
C7 w6 t1 S' c( z6 G* ]+ ophysics, chemistry, and, in a certain sense, biology. The
) l9 K# }& M2 j7 b& p8 |energy exchanges taking place in this realm are of a rela-
- T: G+ k! w+ T0 r1 rtively low order. If these exchanges are below one elec-, g: v) V) u0 ^: b# ~" e4 D/ z! ~
(10) tron volt, such as in the collisions between molecules of ~8 z; g0 S7 {4 |$ p
the air in a room, then atoms and molecules can be' |! }2 x+ P, |( U& U$ q/ Q: ^
regarded as elementary particles. That is, they have* C6 m% ~. X4 `, @
"conditional elementarity" because they keep their iden-2 ^1 o) m7 g @- l; I# u: E# c
tity and do not change in any collisions or in other pro-( R. O$ @% t6 h5 ^* _' \
(15) cesses at these low energy exchanges. If one goes to& X3 x2 I% [3 ^. n3 ~" V! p
higher energy exchanges, say 10,000 electron volts, then3 m3 V5 ^9 M8 t
atoms and molecules will decompose into nuclei and
; \. @3 b7 V1 p% A( @! g( x5 yelectrons; at this level, the latter particles must be consid-9 a/ X9 C+ v! C/ y, ]8 P
ered as elementary. We find examples of structures and- a$ t, e. f, H
(20) processes of this first rung of the quantum ladder on4 j* }! W6 R7 [7 K. c' N1 ]% c+ K3 w
Earth, on planets, and on the surfaces of stars. @0 d# R k5 N
The next rung is the nuclear realm. Here the energy
3 x3 m' r" I% i4 p+ Eexchanges are much higher, on the order of millions of
. J+ l- j3 U4 n3 v0 Eelectron volts. As long as we are dealing with phenom-
7 T6 S& t2 U. k% H1 m' }5 C(25)ena in the atomic realm, such amounts of energy are
5 b) K# y1 u( iunavailable, and most nuclei are inert: they do not
0 y2 Y; Q) l$ h8 K2 x' B+ U/ Pchange. However, if one applies energies of millions of
A4 W* A0 b G8 S+ kelectron volts, nuclear reactions, fission and fusion, and: J! \1 y# [; F4 B# n8 X2 C# M# ]; _0 F Y
the processes of radioactivity occur; our elementary par-
+ |9 j2 Y1 H1 o. V+ J6 y' A1 Y; n(30)ticles then are protons, neutrons, and electrons. In addi-
. h% ?# @+ F5 l, P$ _tion, nuclear processes produce neutrinos, particles that8 S" Y+ P# \+ i1 D% _5 ?& e9 d
have no detectable mass or charge. In the universe, ener-
2 n1 J- Y; }& W& j% F) A% X+ r+ m( |gies at this level are available in the centers of stars and
' S/ Y4 ?3 e! i, A& r- ?in star explosions. Indeed, the energy radiated by the. J: I2 u6 ^ n0 {5 O2 t
(35)stars is produced by nuclear reactions. The natural. J6 M" ^* G7 ?$ `! I6 ^0 {
radioactivity we find on Earth is the long-lived remnant
( w2 {& t; L( j; P9 K" |! e1 dof the time when now-earthly matter was expelled into
+ f9 L7 b; s1 `. qspace by a major stellar explosion.
8 v6 \: O% Q7 r8 I" g+ iThe third rung of the quantum ladder is the subnu-
. {1 Z) t) H9 i# P0 m(40)clear realm. Here we are dealing with energy exchangers
; j3 e) V0 n& B2 o* O9 xof many billions of electron volts. We encounter excited
1 l9 c# j- d1 u2 y8 e& [) f- Unucleons, new types of particles such as mesons, heavy5 a* x' c$ [4 ^
electrons, quarks, and gluons, and also antimatter in1 m5 N: u- f. ?( T+ |
large quantities. The gluons are the quanta, or smallest6 q% g3 `$ C0 ^1 H1 U: z D
(45) units, of the force (the strong force) that keeps the
8 ^( @4 F- g) P& jquarks together. As long as we are dealing with the! W. O' _9 J& T/ r+ F b. d
atomic or nuclear realm, these new types of particles do
) w. c# i' j( x9 G2 v( unot occur and thenucleons remain inert. But at subnu-
+ H% ], J9 p) _5 v% bclear energy levels, the nucleons and mesons appear to
' s' E! B7 T6 r. E$ A5 @(50) be composed of quarks, so that the quarks and gluons9 U$ ?; k U% f1 \* |, |
figure as elementary particles.
Z% C0 b$ D4 }' L$ f7 m
@) K+ i; g3 s% ^7 u
6 Z0 t! u' l6 Z" C% X6 gP64短L4-12; S7 @% ~1 X' f8 W
A Marxist sociologist has argued that racism stems
( c4 P% u2 c& z9 Yfrom the class struggle that is unique to the capitalist6 c, b1 a0 z8 P6 r$ ~( s9 g7 X
system—that racial prejudice is generated by capitalists" r4 }- G2 l/ ]
as a means of controlling workers. His thesis works rel-
) c# C9 a+ Q$ {7 W(5)atively well when applied to discrimination against8 V/ O7 Z; F# x) d
Blacks in the United States, but his definition of racial1 ]/ Q# S! G0 h* i7 W
prejudice as "racially-based negative prejudgments; L4 e9 s$ `& r( n
against a group generally accepted as a race in any: y5 s# R9 L5 Y" i+ u
given region of ethnic competition," can be interpreted
; V2 C5 }& t6 N* p$ H) R- r(10) as also including hostility toward such ethnic groups as
" Y& I4 Z7 _! f7 p& e& \0 C+ othe Chinese in California and the Jews in medieval! O2 Z+ A2 z% B+ l5 e- t/ j7 w) a* @
Europe. However, since prejudice against these latter
) g/ U/ y" w, w0 l& k- U8 S' w U" L7 opeoples was not inspired by capitalists, he has to reason
, w8 b6 h" Z% I" v5 q! F" C1 Jthat such antagonisms were not really based on race.* Z: _: u& w; ?* F$ Q& e& x
(15) He disposes thusly (albeit unconvincingly) of both the' N* P) F7 t E5 q2 C, p
intolerance faced by Jews before the rise of capitalism$ W1 e* j( V- o% \! J
and the early twentieth-century discrimination against0 _( ]' ^) }( C1 f9 F7 G
Oriental people in California, which, inconveniently,
, C1 K: ~4 j4 C; V, o4 R0 e7 Pwas instigated by workers.$ F. R! b0 G4 `' w3 J
1 d) M; U0 O: j5 EP67长L9-18
" |+ X4 g6 `* |# E5 YDifferences between highly creative art and highly creative science arise in part from a difference in their goals. For the sciences, a new theory is the goal and end result of the creative act. Innovative science produces new propositions in terms of which diverse phenomena can be related to one another in more coherent ways. Such phenomena as a brilliant diamond or a nesting bird are relegated to the role of data, serving as the means for formulating or testing a new theory.
+ `$ H& }" C1 l% R" r7 a% I2 F( E3 l4 u$ o/ }$ `
3 S3 \# s; Q u. C
4. 目的已知的例子可以略读
7 _3 M' Y$ g2 ] I- c' b( q 因为即便考题考例子,也很少考例子的具体内容,而是考他的作用,举这个例子in order to?这样会来找目的即可1 ^' ?' l9 O$ l
例:P83长L8-13
) ]9 h# M) D. H5 S7 B5 JThus it is not particularly surprising that some earlier scholarship concerning such cultures has so far gone unchallenged. An example is Johann Bachofen's 1861 treatise on Amazons, women-ruled societies of questionable existence contemporary with ancient Greece.
' ~9 _# n5 X* D% }9 ]/ g( B% Y. v3 Q7 M8 C# x8 m
5. 冒号后面的可以略读,因为冒号以后无非是在重复前文,无非是更详细的叙述,冒好以前读明白,后面完全可以略读# D, i2 ^( C( ^3 W7 r
例:P67长LL18-30% I: u6 N: D& F2 u n7 ]- D
The goal of highly creative art is very different: the phenomenon itself becomes the direct product of the creative act. Shakespeare's Hamlet is not a tract about the behavior of indecisive princes or the uses of political power; nor is Picasso's painting Guernica primarily a propositional statement about the Spanish Civil War or the evils of fascism. What highly creative artistic activity produces is not a new generalization that transcends established limits, but rather an aesthetic particular. Aesthetic particulars produced by the highly creative artist extend or exploit, in an innovative way, the limits of an existing form, rather than transcend that form. |
|