Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words. pictures. music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Diversified spiritual productions have flooded into our society today and have also been influencing people’s lives subconsciously day by day. Though these words, pictures and music or films are the creative crystallizations of artists, there are some negative factors of these works which should still be restricted by the government.
With the development of film industry, each kind of film owns its own audiences. For example, literary movies could satisfy and enrich one’s spiritual world. Action movies could make one’s heart beat up and down as the story goes by in order to relax the nerves from work. So, every kind of film has their own supporters. But, today, more and more people are attracted by some negative movies, such as violence movies. Actually, some artists always add some plots about fighting, murdering, killing, stealing, pornographic and illegal dealing etc in order to play the atmosphere up in the story of the movie. But, many people, especially young people, are doing the things they have watched from the movies in real world. This has lead many people into the wrong way and has badly affected the whole society. So, governments really need to consider on whether some films should be restricted, especially about pornographic, drug dealings and violence.
Of course, creative artists have their own rights to produce their good works and our audiences are always expecting their good works as well. But government also has responsibilities to ensure its social security. Restriction on some negative works of artists’ ideas may also be a reasonable and possible way to make its people far away from misleading.
Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words. pictures. music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Diversified spiritual productions have flooded into our society today and have also been influencing people’s lives subconsciously day by day. Though these words, pictures and music or films are the creative crystallizations of artists, there are some negative factors of these works which should still be restricted by the government. [开头很清晰]
With the development of film industry, each kind of film owns its own audiences. For example, literary movies could satisfy and enrich one’s spiritual world. Action movies could make one’s heart beat up and down as the story goes by in order to relax the nerves from work. So, every kind of film has their own supporters. But, today, more and more people are attracted by some negative movies, such as violence movies. Actually, some artists always add some plots about fighting, murdering, killing, stealing, pornographic and illegal dealing etc in order to play the atmosphere up in the story of the movie. But, many people, especially young people, are doing the things they have watched from the [去掉the]movies in real world. This has lead many people into the wrong way and has badly affected the whole society. So, governments really need to consider on [去掉on]whether some films should be restricted, especially about pornographic, drug dealings and violence.
Of course, creative artists have their own rights to produce their good works and our audiences are always expecting their good works as well. But government also has responsibilities to ensure its social security. Restriction on some negative works of artists’ ideas may also be a reasonable and possible way to make its people far away from misleading.