- 最后登录
- 2012-7-10
- 在线时间
- 219 小时
- 寄托币
- 274
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-1-29
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 153
- UID
- 2452739

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 274
- 注册时间
- 2008-1-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
issue120
"So much is new and complex today that looking back for an understanding of the past provides little guidance for living in the present."
Should today so much is new and complex that looking back for an understanding of the past provides nothing important for living in the present as the speaker asserts?(第一句这么复杂...尽量用自己的话复述一遍题目吧...) It is true that in some respect(respects) some people would prefer(people prefer) to agree that the understanding of the past is useless for the new and complex present(形容词顺序?) life. While in my points of(删掉) my view, I fundamentally disagree(一般都说fundamentally agree吧...有"基本不同意"么...) with the speaker's conclusion for some reasons substantiated by the following discussion(discussions).
Admittedly, there are more and more situations today human never encountered in the current society(in the past). According with(to) the development of technology, it is impossible for us to escape the new and complex problems. For instance the ethics problems about euthanasia, homosexuality and human cloing(cloning) have appeared in the stage of world(登上世界舞台?也许有更好的表达方式吧), which are very different from the problems human have dealt with. And the issue of how to protect the environment, when developing(to develop) the industry, has been obtained more focus in the present. Facing these questions never occurred, seldom can we get a help from the past.
Nevertheless, when it comes to the value of forepassed experience(experiences), it is necessary for us to associate with the past. At the individual levels, a person who delve the history not only would(看大意应该用should) know what the ancient created in the past, but would(should) also learn what they falsely commit in the past and avoid committing the same mistakes in the present. At the social levels, by studying the ways of solving the economic inflation and depression, a government can prevent the same crisis from impeding development of society. At the national levels, Hilter(Hitler;d:) and his Naism caused a horrible war to the German and other many people in the world, were a leader of Germany can truly cognized the harm of Hilter(Hitler) and hi(his) Naism, he would be more careful to govern the country and deeply know the treasure of stability and peace. (个人感觉例子就说一两个就够了...最好在举例之后,用一句话分析&点题)
Furthermore, it is not wise and justifiable to address problems simply referring the past. Nowadays, there is a set of varieties between the present and the past. We need to adjust according the specific situation(situations?). For example, in the past, the typical lecture approach where the professor imparts to the students and the students take it down and take it in has changed into a new lecture approach.(没看懂这个例子...) This new approach emphasize that the most important part of education is this instruction of a man in what he has inside him. Accordingly, it is important to(for) us to adjust our lecture approach based the past experience and newly specific acquirement.
In sum, without the past experience(experiences,下同...) an individual, a society and a nation can advance themselves. It is arbitrary to asserts(assert) that looking back for an understanding of the past provides little guidance for living in the present. Moreover,(?删掉) The most important thing we should do is that sufficiently utilizing the past experience according current acquirement.
后记:
1、先自己在word里面改一下错误再贴上来...最好贴文章的时候也把题目贴上,方便别人方便自己
2、很多介词错误,我英文这么烂都被我找出来这么多...多看看范文,同努力同努力
3、把agree的放一起,把disagree的观点放一起,不要agree-disagree-agree...
4、个人感觉你的1和3论点有些雷同唉,可以合并成一个观点...而且感觉你文章后面没有点到开头段的fundamentally disagree
[ 本帖最后由 zhuzhuor 于 2008-2-6 04:21 编辑 ] |
|