Argument 180 The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Ac me Publishing Company.
"Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. Obviously, the faster you can read, the more information you can absorb in a single workday. Moreover, Easy Read costs only $500 per employee-a small price to pay when you consider the benefits to Acme. Included in this fee is a three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Clearly, Acme would benefit greatly by requiring all of our employees to take the Easy Read course."
字数:422
The personnel director of Acme Publishing Company recommends that Acme should require all of their employees to take the Easy Read course in order to receive great benefit. To bolster his recommendation, the director points out that many other companies had improved their productivities after having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course,one graduate can read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours while another rose to vice president in under a year. Furthermore, the course cost only $500 one employee. However, the evidences the director cites are incredible to render his recommendation convincing.
Firstly, the director ignores other factors that can improve the productivities of other companies. It is possible that other companies have renewed their equipments during the period which greatly improve their productivities, or the managers have taken effective measures to ensure their employees finish task on time. Without ruling our other possible ways that can accelerate productivity, the director can not conclude that having employees take the Easy Read course result in the improvement of productivity.
Secondly, the two graduates the director cites are unnecessarily indicate that the Easy Read course is useful. Perhaps, the graduate read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours but miss useful details, and it is just wasting time and energy. Moreover, the promotion of another graduate is likely due to his strong personal ability or special background. The director also unfairly concludes that the quicker you read the more information you can absorb. As far as I know, only when you take the word in heart or understand them completely, than you can get the theme or quintessence of the article. The faster you read the more details you may miss.
Thirdly, the director doesn’t take the differences between Acme and other companies into account. It is entirely possible that Acme doesn’t need to read many report, let alone read fast. If it is the case, the small price to pay for per employee would be a big burden, which may slower the productivity of Acme; especially Acme should give every employee a three-week holiday with salary.
In sum, the recommendation relies on a series of incredible evidences, which render it unconvincing as it stands. To better evaluate this argument, I need to know more details about the Easy Read course and the differences between Acme and other companies. At the same time, the director should provide sound evidences that the course can really faster our reading and the improvement of other companies’ productivities is due to the course.
The personnel director of Acme Publishing Company recommends that Acme should require all of their employees to take the Easy Read course in order to receive great benefit. To bolster his recommendation, the director points out that many other companies had improved their productivities after having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course,one graduate can read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours while another rose to vice president in under a year. Furthermore, the course cost only $500 one employee. However, the evidences the director cites are incredible to render his recommendation convincing.
这个开头太长了,交待题目的内容不需太多字数,一笔带过就行了。
Firstly, the director ignores other factors that can improve the productivities of other companies. It is possible that other companies have renewed their equipments during the period which greatly improve their productivities, or the managers have taken effective measures to ensure their employees finish task on time. Without ruling our other possible ways that can accelerate productivity, the director can not conclude that having employees take the Easy Read course result in the improvement of productivity.
Secondly, the two graduates the director cites are unnecessarily indicate that the Easy Read course is useful. Perhaps, the graduate read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours but miss useful details, and it is just wasting time and energy. Moreover, the promotion of another graduate is likely due to his strong personal ability or special background. The director also unfairly concludes that the quicker you read the more information you can absorb. As far as I know, only when you take the word in heart or understand them completely, than you can get the theme or quintessence of the article. The faster you read the more details you may miss.
这一段中,前后两个部分完全可以分开写,这样可以写的更充实。后一部分( The director also unfairly concludes that the quicker you read ... )本来是个非常好的攻击点。
Thirdly, the director doesn’t take the differences between Acme and other companies into account. It is entirely possible that Acme doesn’t need to read many report, let alone read fast. If it is the case, the small price to pay for per employee would be a big burden, which may slower the productivity of Acme; especially Acme should give every employee a three-week holiday with salary.
In sum, the recommendation relies on a series of incredible evidences, which render it unconvincing as it stands. To better evaluate this argument, I need to know more details about the Easy Read course and the differences between Acme and other companies. At the same time, the director should provide sound evidences that the course can really faster our reading and the improvement of other companies’ productivities is due to the course.