- 最后登录
- 2008-5-15
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 52
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-8
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 42
- UID
- 2250613

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 52
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-8
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
一共三篇,帮忙修正一下语法和格式吧,谢谢~!!!
1。
We Are Not Just Fucked Up According to the order of nature, we can learn that we were shaped by the unity of spermatozoon from father and ovum from mother. A famous poet, Phillip Larkin, claims in his poem “This Be the Verse” that a child is just a result of this irresponsible coition. In the first two sentence of Larkin’s Poem, “they fuck you up, you mum and dad/ they ” (lines 1-2), Larkin uses vulgar words which indicate the way that children shaped is dirty and erotic which is unwanted for the parents. In my opinion, it also can be considered as children are always messed up by their parents although they are not intended to do that. There are almost no parents who don’t want to teach their children on the right way and never let them go through the fault, but they do sometimes let their children go through the wrong way because they also have some faults which have not been realized by them yet and they are so unconsciously about what they have done. With these faults, they don’t have enough ability to teach their children using the right way but they still teach the children only because they think that they are parents, thereby they have the obligation and right to teach their children. Furthermore, as the time passes, the children will create some faults by themselves as their parents do too.
Then Phillip Larkin emphasizes, “But they were fucked up in their turn” (line 5), indicates that the faults of the parents are given by their parents. It shows that the passing fault is an endless cycle that is given by the earlier generations. After that, Larkin lampoons those early generations as starchy and antiquated by describing their unfashionable clothes and complains that they spend time on blaming the life and each other rather than raising their children wholehearted and it is transmitted to the later generations one by one.
In the last part of the poem, Larkin compares the cycle of the transmission to the coastal shelf indicating that the cycle of transmission is endless. Like the sand on the beach which is becoming more and more by the tide’s driving, the transmitting faults are also being developed; as the moving of tide never stops, the sand will be deeper all the time, so the faults in transmission will not stop. Moreover, Larkin suggests “And don’t have any kids yourself” (line 12) -- the only way in his mind to get out from this endless cycle.
This poem makes me think about a similar article called “parents” I have read several of days before in which have the writer Thich Nhat Hanh also talked about the transmission from parents to children. Both of Larkin and Nhat Hanh point out that there are always some endless bad cycle of the transmissions as Larkin emphasizes in his poem, “They fill you up with the faults they had/ And add some extra, just for you” (line 3-4), and “But they were fucked up in their turn” (lines 5); while Nhat Hanh mentions in his article, “ There is a continuation in the transmission of seeds, and their father and mother might have gotten those seeds from their grandfather and grandmother” (71).
However, they still have some ideas which make their points of view become dissimilar.
Firstly, we can learn from Larkin’s sentence, “But they were fucked up in their turn/By fools in old-style hats and coats” (lines 5-6), in which Larkin seriously indicates the bad cycle of transmissions from the early generations by vituperating and lampooning about the early generations; while Thich Nhat Hanh’s illustrates that children should be not only thankful to their early generations but also to understand the early generations with forgiveness because everything they have now is from the early generations.
Secondly, through Larkin’s poem “Man hands on misery to man/It deepens like a coastal shelf” (line 9-10) which indicate that the cycle of transmitting the faults is endless, we can find out that Larkin’s attitude is totally passive. He thinks that this cycle of transmission of faults can only be deeper and deeper rather than considering it as this cycle can be fixed by people. Nevertheless, in Nhat Hanh’s article, gives an opposite idea of this cycle by telling a story of a little boy. The boy was once angry at his father because his father always shouts at him when he fell down. But three years later, he found out that he would also do the same thing to his little sister if he doesn’t rule his anger and, his father was just a victim of suffering from his own parents. Hence he practiced to control his anger and also let his father do the same practice. At last, he went out from this cycle of fault’s transmission successfully. This story shows that the cycle of fault transmission is not endless all the time. Although most of time, people have to get the fault from their parents unintentionally, they can still find the way to stop and fix this cycle.
Finally, Larkin gives a suggestion, “And don’t have any kids yourself” (line 12), which shows the only way to get out of the faults transmission is to stop multiplying. But since as human kind, we cannot stop multiplying if we don’t want to be extinct. Thereby, Nhat Hanh gives a positive idea of stopping this fault transmission — realizes the fault, and, with people’s willpower, love and patience, stops it from transmitting to the next generation.
As far as I considered, I strongly agree with Nhat Hanh’s point of view. I was raised up by my grandparents when I was a little girl. I used to cry a lot and deuced hate them because they always fight loudly without any concern about my existence. One summer vacation, I let my little niece out to play in the park with some of my friends. We were sitting together and talking happily. Without any signs or evidences, a girl in another class who was let by my friend began to decry me on the breaking up of me and my ex-boyfriend with some of the grimy words. Therefore I was so angry that I scrapped with her loudly. When I turn my head once, I saw that my little niece was looking at me with the tears in her eyes. Suddenly, I saw my childhood in the shadow of her and felt extremely regretful because I knew that I was becoming my grandparents whom I hated most. Thus I stopped fighting with that girl and apologized to my niece. Also, I promised that I wouldn’t scrap with anyone to make others terrified. I count ten seconds every time before becoming uncontrollable angry, then I get the time to consider whether it is worthy to be angry or not. Today, I can easily control my anger without hurting anyone. Although my experience is just a little story, it can still reflect that as human beings, we can stop the transmission of the faults by ourselves step by step. If I didn’t realize that I was doing the same thing as my grandparents did, I would probably transmit this fault to my kids some time later. Luckily, I found the way to stop the cycle and escaped from it. In my opinion, there is no one who doesn’t have the ability to stop the fault, it’s just depends on people’s mind. If one is heart-searching, tolerant, and willing to pay the patience and love, for what reason can’t him stop the transmission of the fault? |
|