火箭小组第一次作业lynn

serene777UID: 2478926

17. "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
  
有两种法律：公正的和不公正的。每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正的法律，但是更重要的是，更应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。


Two types of laws exist in the society, namely just and unjust, which we have a responsibility to obey the former while disobey the latter. Is this true as the speaker asserts? In my point of view, whether a law is just or not depends largely on how we render it, and in a democratic society, we should obey the law regardless of or own inclination.  
  In a modern society, laws in most cases reveal the requirement of the majority. Admittedly, we have laws and regulations that gradually losses its values and justness over time. Furthermore, whether a law is fair or not also lies in our standpoint. There are entrepreneurs who believe taxes are too high, but there are also politicians arguing taxes should be levied to pave the roads and to build hospitals. Manufacturers complain about the too many requirements on environment-protection that impedes the development of factories while someone still appeals to the state on more confines added to the current law.
  As it shows, the world will fall to chaos once everyone chooses to obey in his own will. In addition, the law has a goal to glue each and every individual and to make the world more effective and concord. Law is a necessity and a must when people live among others and have to sacrifice part of freedom in order to protect the most essential of our self-directness or autonomy.
  What's more, law distinguishes itself by its coercive and formal aspect from other bounds as public opinion, mores, ethic, etc. Thus we violate the authority of law if we are to reject obeying it. Even if a law isn't satisfactory to most, once we disobey it, we acquiesce infringing other just and fundamental laws. Once the law is violated, the brutal conducts of Ku Klus Klan, for instance, is to be overlooked,
  Rather, we can resort to other channels to fixing and updating laws. The law is adaptable and flexible to meet the requirements of the majority. [url=]In the [/url]United States, every district has a representative to the House chamber and every state has senates to whom citizen can appeal.[MS1]   .
In conclusion, laws have a normative basis relevant to morality and they help protect the self-directness or autonomy. Laws are supposed to strike a balance between people of diverse interests. Actions other than legal proceedings to infract laws for whatever reason are unnecessary in modern world.



[MS1]是否属实？

babyface1124UID: 2494668

Two types of laws exist in the society, namely just and unjust, which we have a responsibility to obey the former while disobey the latter. Is this true as the speaker asserts? In my point of view, whether a law is just or not depends largely on how we render it, and in a democratic society, we should obey the law regardless of or own inclination.  
  In a modern society, laws in most cases reveal the requirement of the majority. Admittedly, we have laws and regulations that gradually losses its values and justness(justice) over time. Furthermore, whether a law is fair or not also lies in our standpoint. (good)There are entrepreneurs who believe taxes are too high, but there are also politicians arguing taxes should be levied to pave the roads and to build hospitals. Manufacturers complain about the too many requirements on environment-protection that impedes the development of factories while someone still appeals to the state on more confines added to the current law.(例子符合)
  As it shows, the world will fall to chaos once everyone chooses to obey in his own will. In addition, the law has a goal to glue each and every individual and to make the world more effective and concord. Law is a necessity and a must when people live among others and have to sacrifice part of freedom in order to protect the most essential of our self-directness or autonomy.
  What's more, law distinguishes itself by its coercive and formal aspect from other bounds as public opinion, mores, ethic, etc. Thus we violate the authority of law if we are to reject obeying it. Even if a law isn't satisfactory to most, once we disobey it, we acquiesce infringing other just and fundamental laws. Once the law is violated, the brutal conducts of Ku Klus Klan, for instance, is to be overlooked,(好象例子没办法论证观点,违法行为和反对不公正的法律之间有区别,需要进一步说明)
  Rather, we can resort to other channels to fixing and updating laws. The law is adaptable and flexible to meet the requirements of the majority. [url=]In the [/url]United States, every district has a representative to the House chamber and every state has senates to whom citizen can appeal.[MS1]   .
In conclusion, laws have a normative basis relevant to morality and they help protect the self-directness or autonomy. Laws are supposed to strike a balance between people of diverse interests. Actions other than legal proceedings to infract laws for whatever reason are unnecessary in modern world.

文章总体观点清晰,如果每段首句 TS能概括好这个段落的意思就更好了:)

cloudwind-greUID: 2462220

Two types of laws exist in the society, namely just and unjust, which we have a responsibility to obey the former while disobey the latter. Is this true as the speaker asserts? In my point of view, whether a law is just or not depends largely on how we render it, and in a democratic society, we should obey the law regardless of or (our) own inclination.  
  In a modern society, laws in most cases reveal the requirement of the majority. Admittedly, we have laws and regulations that gradually losses its values and justness over time. Furthermore, whether a law is fair or not also lies in our standpoint. There are entrepreneurs who believe taxes are too high, but there are also politicians arguing taxes should be levied to pave the roads and to build hospitals.(这个例子举得好）. Manufacturers complain about the too many requirements on environment-protection that impedes the development of factories while someone still appeals to the state on more confines added to the current law.(这句与前面关于环境保护对应比较少)
  As it shows, the world will fall to chaos once everyone chooses to obey （最好加上 laws）in his own will. In addition, the law has a goal to glue each and every individual and to make the world more effective and concord（concord是名词，建议用harmonious）. Law is a necessity and a must when people live among others and have to sacrifice part of (their or the) freedom in order to protect the most essential of our self-directness or autonomy.
  What's more, law distinguishes itself by its coercive and formal aspect from other bounds as public opinion, mores, ethic, etc. Thus we violate the authority of law if we are to reject obeying it. Even if a law isn't satisfactory to most, once we disobey it, we acquiesce infringing other just and fundamental laws. Once the law is violated, the brutal conducts of Ku Klus Klan, for instance, is to be overlooked,
  Rather, we can resort to other channels to fixing and updating (to 后应用原型？：fix and update ) laws. The law is adaptable and flexible to meet the requirements of the majority. [url=]In the [/url]United States, every district has a representative to the House chamber and every state has senates to whom citizen can appeal.[MS1]   .
In conclusion, laws have a normative basis relevant to morality and they help protect the self-directness or autonomy. Laws are supposed to strike a balance between people of diverse interests. Actions other than legal proceedings to infract laws for whatever (any) reason are unnecessary in modern world.
MS1 是对的，美国定义每个选区一个众仪员，选区是按人口分的；不伦州的大小，每个州两个参仪员，加洲与新罕布什尔州一样在参仪院只有两个参仪员。
词汇丰富，富于变化，较少语法错误，论证的2、3、4 三段中第二段思路比较清晰，第三段应是说明法律的作用吧，但其TOPIC SENTENCE 好像是说还是人们按自己意愿对待法律造成的坏处。
总体来说，文章语言方面无可挑剔是优秀的，思路方面可以理清一点。

[ 本帖最后由 cloudwind-gre 于 2008-6-3 02:37 编辑 ]