issue144 【7\8\9\10】第四次作业

tsayUID: 2492916

       题目：ISSUE153
    "Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."
450 words

    Should students bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study? And should they question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively? In my view, appropriate skepticism is necessary in education and science development, over skepticism, however, is
harmful.
   
    First of all, in education, the basic knowledge theory, what students are taught, is somewhat boring and bland; A new research finding points out that only less than 30 percent of lecture knowledge can be remembered one week later. A passive acceptance, to whatever they study, results in a low effective education and learning. Meanwhile, the skepticism is a active process of learning in which student think and apply the knowledge in their lives. These, who suspect these knowledge, might question why, and apply it to the practice environment in order to valid whether it is true or not. In such a way, a active learning has been formed and these knowledge absorbed effectively.
   
    Moreover, we could not, because of it's limitation, accept the theory without skepticism; The history has taught us that skepticism has greatly contributes the progress society and development of science and technology. If all researchers and scholars view these developed theories as constantly true one-in other word, nothing worth to change and improve, then what they need to is to apply these established theories to resolve the current practical problems rather than to develop new one, which would significant contribute our society. Also, the latest significant progress could not be completed without scientist's skepticism. Look no further than the annual Nobel winner at physics and chemists, have not there been new theories and finding, which are different from, even overturn these old ones? And it’s these innovative and creative idea and theories, which win the Noble rewarding, have lead to  the progress of society and improved our lives.
     
    It's true that skepticism would contributes our learning and researching. Undue skepticism, however, would lead to a harmful consequence.  If we emphasize too much skepticism on what we are taught, we usually become confused and refused to accept them, which, however, has been proved useful and conductive to our resolving the problem. Also, such a undue skepticism even become the excuse that students evade to learn these knowledge in school. In such a way, education would become invalid. In short, we could not refuse everything because of skepticism.  
   
    Nor does one acknowledge these contribution, which the scientist and researcher have made with an undue skepticism. In fact, these contribution have beneficial to our development of current theory and achievement .As Newton-the famous physicists-said(I paraphrase): we look further just because we stand on the shoulder of giants. perhaps one would argue that relativity of Albert Ainstein, the famous scientist and Nobel winner, would not developed any existed physical theory. Without such a profound physical knowledge, could the well-known physics develop such a theory?
  In conclusion, the skepticism is indispensable in education and science, since it contributes our learning and working. Without the skepticism, the education would become a birdcage in which, students might be like the parrot，However, we should not lost more important things-- because of our over-skepticism.

[ 本帖最后由 tsay 于 2008-7-25 22:30 编辑 ]

lisheng19881108UID: 2358622

题目：ISSUE153
    "Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."450 words     Should students bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study? And should they question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively? In my view, appropriate skepticism is necessary in education and science development, over skepticism, however, is harmful.（这种句式应该是北美范文里的吧感觉不错积累一个呵呵）
        First of all, in education, the basic knowledge theory, what students are taught, is somewhat boring and bland; A new research finding points out that only less than 30 percent of lecture knowledge can be remembered one week later.（我觉得这句话说的没力度要多加点定语让别人觉得是不可置疑的）A passive acceptance, to whatever they study, results in a low effective education and learning. Meanwhile, the skepticism is a active process of learning in which student think and apply the knowledge in their lives. These, who suspect these knowledge, might question why, and apply it to the practice environment in order to valid whether it is true or not. In such a way, a active learning has been formed and these knowledge absorbed effectively.         Moreover, we could not, because of its limitation, accept the theory without skepticism; The history has taught us that skepticism has greatly contributes the progress society and development of science and technology. If all researchers and scholars view these developed theories as constantly true one-in other word, nothing worth to change and improve, then what they need to is to apply these established theories to resolve the current practical problems rather than to develop new one, which would significant contribute our society.(我不知道which前用逗号隔开会不会有歧义，比如说我第一遍读就以为你which是指代前面一个句子而不是new one 有什么问题大家在商量哈！) Also, the latest significant progress could not be completed without scientist's skepticism. Look no further than the annual Nobel winner at physics and chemists, have not there been new theories and finding, which are different from, even overturn these old ones? And it’s these innovative and creative idea and theories, which win the Noble rewarding, have lead to the progress of society and improve our lives.         It's true that skepticism would contribute our learning and researching. Undue skepticism, however, would lead to a harmful consequence.  If we emphasize too much skepticism on what we are taught, we usually become confused and refused to accept them, which, however, has been proved useful and conductive to our resolving the problem. Also, such a undue skepticism even become the excuse that students evade to learn these knowledge in school. In such a way, education would become invalid. In short, we could not refuse everything because of skepticism.  （我们不能因为怀疑拒绝任何事，我觉得可以把everything这个词换一下改为你文中提到的the thing which has been proved useful）        Nor does one acknowledge these contribution, which the scientist and researcher have made with an undue skepticism. In fact, these contribution have beneficial to our development of current theory and achievement .As Newton-the famous physicists-said(I paraphrase): we look further just because we stand on the shoulder of giants. perhaps one would argue that relativity of Albert Ainstein, the famous scientist and Nobel winner, would not developed any existed physical theory. Without such a profound physical knowledge, could the well-known physics develop such a theory?(等你来了后请告诉我你这一段表达的是什么意思，还有就是开头是什么意思，用法是什么，谢谢，呵呵)  In conclusion, the skepticism is indispensable in education and science, since it contributes our learning and working. Without the skepticism, the education would become a birdcage in which, students might be like the parrot，However, we should not lost more important things-- because of our over-skepticism.
（除了倒数第二段我没搞懂总体文章段落清晰，中心论点表达的也不错，只是我建议可以再把每段的中心提炼一下， 给人的感觉会更好）

tsayUID: 2492916

题目：ISSUE153
    "Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."450 words     Should students bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study? And should they question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively? In my view, appropriate skepticism is necessary in education and science development, over skepticism, however, is harmful.（这种句式应该是北美范文里的吧感觉不错积累一个呵呵）  这个  是自己原创的的啊!!还不知道是不是正宗的美语 北美全是赞同 反对什么
        First of all, in education, the basic knowledge theory, what students are taught, is somewhat boring and bland; A new research finding points out that only less than 30 percent of lecture knowledge can be remembered one week later.（我觉得这句话说的没力度要多加点定语让别人觉得是不可置疑的）A passive acceptance, to whatever they study, results in a low effective education and learning. Meanwhile, the skepticism is a active process of learning in which student think and apply the knowledge in their lives. These, who suspect these knowledge, might question why, and apply it to the practice environment in order to valid whether it is true or not. In such a way, a active learning has been formed and these knowledge absorbed effectively.         Moreover, we could not, because of its limitation, accept the theory without skepticism; The history has taught us that skepticism has greatly contributes the progress society and development of science and technology. If all researchers and scholars view these developed theories as constantly true one-in other word, nothing worth to change and improve, then what they need to is to apply these established theories ,which would significant contribute our society,to resolve the current practical problems rather than to develop new one, (我不知道which前用逗号隔开会不会有歧义，比如说我第一遍读就以为你which是指代前面一个句子而不是new one 有什么问题大家在商量哈！)  这个 我改 Also, the latest significant progress could not be completed without scientist's skepticism. Look no further than the annual Nobel winner at physics and chemists, have not there been new theories and finding, which are different from, even overturn these old ones? And it’s these innovative and creative idea and theories, which win the Noble rewarding, have lead to the progress of society and improve our lives.         It's true that skepticism would contribute our learning and researching. Undue skepticism, however, would lead to a harmful consequence.  If we emphasize too much skepticism on what we are taught, we usually become confused and refused to accept them, which, however, has been proved useful and conductive to our Also, such a undue skepticism even become the excuse that students evade to learn these knowledge in school. In such a way, eduresolving the problem. cation would become invalid. In short, we could not refuse everything because of skepticism.  （我们不能因为怀疑拒绝任何事，我觉得可以把everything这个词换一下改为你文中提到的the thing which has been proved useful）    好主意 谢谢
    , w
    Nor does one acknowledge these contributionhich the scientist and researcher have made with an undue skepticism. In fact, these contribution have beneficial to our development of current theory and achievement .As Newton-the famous physicists-said(I paraphrase): we look further just because we stand on the shoulder of giants. perhaps one would argue that relativity of Albert Ainstein, the famous scientist and Nobel winner, would not developed any existed physical theory. Without such a profound physical knowledge, could the well-known physics develop such a theory?(等你来了后请告诉我你这一段表达的是什么意思，还有就是开头是什么意思，用法是什么，谢谢，呵呵)  这个大意是由于过度的怀疑 我们不承认科学家们的贡献 这样做是不对的 第一句话是不是不对??好像我这段没有中心局的 写这篇觉得有点痛苦 因为是限时做的 不知道现在开始限时是不是早了点呢??
    In conclusion, the skepticism is indispensable in education and science, since it contributes our learning and working. Without the skepticism, the education would become a birdcage in which, students might be like the parrot，However, we should not lost more important things-- because of our over-skepticism.

（除了倒数第二段我没搞懂总体文章段落清晰，中心论点表达的也不错，只是我建议可以再把每段的中心提炼一下，(提炼是什么意思 是该下vtopsentense  还是改组织 ) 给人的感觉会更好）

[ 本帖最后由 tsay 于 2008-7-27 23:04 编辑 ]