- 最后登录
- 2010-5-9
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 186
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-1-9
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 135
- UID
- 2445851

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 186
- 注册时间
- 2008-1-9
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
原帖由 迷茫者 于 2008-7-27 13:23 发表
如果每年上课11个月以上,学生会得到更有效的教育。(周天作业)
When it comes to issue about whether students should take classes in eleven months of one year or even more, there always exist diff ...
When it comes to issue about whether students should take classes in eleven months of one year or even more, there always exists different viewpoints. Some, with the first impression, assert that the longer students spend time on study(是不是the longer time the students spend on study会更好点阿?), the better the result will be. As far as I am concerned, I tend to place a high value on appropriate free time for students themselves. I will explain my opinion based on the following reasons.
v
First of all, overmuch time of taking classes is not beneficial to learning. It, sometimes, even leads to some negative influence. Every people usually have such a feeling that if one is always compelled to do same things, he or she will start to be tired of them and generates emotional resistance, no matter how you love them at the beginning. Similarly, students also will have these negative emotions, if they are obliged to study overmuch. Take my personal experience for example, I used to love learning before going high school, but after becoming a high school student, I grew to be bored with study even afraid of it. Because in order to get a limited opportunity of entering a reputable university among millions of students, I have to learn without weekend and vacation.留()学,()考试,TOEFL,GRE,GMAT,IELTS,SAT,VISA,文书(),签证,论坛,出国,申请,美国,英国,欧洲,加拿大,USA%l_
`M;S-ca
(个人觉得这个例子有点怪啊,既然你不喜欢读书,干吗来考托福阿,难道也是为了一个入学机会?感觉例子表达的比较消极的你~)
In the next place, to the young students, proper leisure time is indispensable for learning better. Accurate recreation could stimulate children’s originality and develop interest for learning. Beneficial recreation also is a part of education. For kids, recreation, to some extent, is even more important than traditional education like taking classes. For instance, if you let students at the age of 5-7 take classes more than 11 months a year, what they could take in is little, but if you allow them do some beneficial recreation in proper time, they will generate much original thoughts which are useful to further education in the future.(感觉这个例子要是改称研究表示什么的会比较合理,个人意见哈~)
zR
Last but not least, spending so many time on learning does harm to student’s health. In today’s society, the competition among the students is tremendously intense. This will form stress to students. If we request students spend more time on study, the tress will be aggravated. As we know, excessive stress will damage our health seriously both physically and psychologically.
(wM8w.jJ
All in all, taking all above-mentioned into consideration, we can see how terrible it is to prolong the time of taking classes to 11 months or even more a year. Because it will not only has no benefit to learning better
_"duzU-sl5cbut has some negative effect on students’ health and study. |
|