IMPULSE作文小组----- 生活习惯类-周二作业

lemon1kgUID: 2309820

2006 年3 月17 日

人们期待只在一个企业或者只给一个雇主工作是否现实（周二作业）

Whether it is realistic to work for a company or be hired for a employer for one's life time? The Japanese say yes. In their country all of the companies according to the principle. However, in my point of view, the life-time hired system for a company that are willing to be competitive, for a employee who wants to be successful or for a society which seeks for fast developing is not a kind of good idea.


First of all, if a company is running relying on the stable employees will lack of fresh ideas and gradually turn out to be less competitive. We all know that most big company consist of every-aged employees. The olds are full of experience that they can master the general direction of process, in case of making simple mistakes while the youngs bring about some fresh ideas to the innovation of new products or even are the initial of a benefit revolutionary. Only take advantages of the two groups can a company shows more competitive.


For an individual, the system means covering one's potential to success. apparently,being hired for lifetime seems great, because he or she need not fear of losing a job any more. Yet at the same time the employee also need not consider of how to get better qualification. Most of human beings has a trend to be lazy, to live a easy life. Therefore, a life-time hired system will not doubt provides them a excuse to be forced to move on, no one want to make efforts for earning living, isn't it too sad?


Further more, the life-time hired system also has a neglect effect on the whole society. Suppose that if everyone in the society lose their desire to get progress, how would a society be like? It is true that Japan creates wonders of their economy, but in my opinion, it depends on the very character or the style of their country. After all, the cases differ from countries to countries. For most capitalistic countries, hiring employees for their life time is decidedly a harmless way of development.


To sum up, from any view , company, individual,or the society,the life-time hired system is unrealistic and do more harm than good. As far as i am concerned, only keeping a fresh energy, persistent effort and developed state can the whole world get better.

好像写着写着又有点偏了~:(  不过我觉得题目有点怪怪的。。。

[ 本帖最后由 lemon1kg 于 2008-7-28 21:43 编辑 ]

saintjUID: 2248994

Whether it is realistic to work for a company or be hired for a （one) employer for one's life time? The Japanese say yes. In their country all of the companies according to the principle. However, in my point of view, the life-time hired system for a company that are willing to be competitive, for a (an) employee who wants to be successful or for a society which seeks for fast developing is not a kind of good idea.

First of all, if a company is running relying on the stable employees will lack of fresh ideas and gradually turn out to be less competitive. We all know that most big company consist of every-aged employees. The olds are full of experience that they can master the general direction of process, in case of making simple mistakes while the youngs bring about some fresh ideas to the innovation of new products or even are the initial of a benefit revolutionary. Only take advantages of the two groups can a company shows more competitive.寄托家园6z)t[ lqUvZ*yy
6KpR Z;W'e&Od.r0?8w:w
u
-N/_c~&_8kL9`'|_
For an individual, the system means covering one's potential to success. apparently,being hired for lifetime seems great, because he or she need not fear of losing a job any more. Yet at the same time the employee also need not consider of how to get better qualification. Most of human beings has (have) a trend to be lazy, to live a easy life. Therefore, a life-time hired system will not doubt provides them a (an) excuse to be forced to move on, no one want to make efforts for earning living, isn't it too sad?

Further more, the life-time hired system also has a neglect effect (has neglected the effect) on the whole society. Suppose that if everyone in the society lose their desire to get progress, how would a society be like? It is true that Japan creates wonders of their economy, but in my opinion, it depends on the very character or the style of their country. After all, the cases differ from countries to countries. For most capitalistic countries, hiring employees for their life time is decidedly a harmless way of development.

To sum up, from any view , company, individual,or the society,the life-time hired system is unrealistic and do more harm than good. As far as i am concerned, only keeping a fresh energy, persistent effort and developed state can the whole world get better.

我觉得文章可以这样改一下，分为两个部分，一个是主观方面，另一个是客观方面。文章的论述部分的第一段和第三段论点较为一致，最好不要分开。
PS：我也觉得题目有点怪。

19811010316UID: 2220703

Whether it is realistic to work for a company or be hired for a employer for one's life time? The Japanese say yes. In their country all of the companies according to the principle(感觉像半截话). However, in（from） my point of view, the life-time hired system for a company that are willing to be competitive, for a employee who wants to be successful or for a society which seeks for fast developing is not a kind of good idea.
First of all, if a company is running run relying on the stable employees will lack of fresh ideas and gradually turn out to be less competitive. We all know that most big company consist of every-aged employees. The olds are full of experience that they can master the general direction of process, in case of making simple mistakes while the youngs bring up about some fresh ideas to the innovation of new products or even are the initial of a benefit revolutionary. Only take advantages of the two groups can a company shows more competitive(论证与主题句好像脱节了).,l9ZA {_/|$t        \^For an individual, the system means covering one's potential to success. apparently,being hired for lifetime seems great, because he or she need not fear of losing a job any more. Yet at the same time the employee also need not consider of how to get better qualification. Most of human beings has a trend to be lazy, to live a easy life. Therefore, a life-time hired system will not doubt provides them a excuse to be forced to move on, no one want to make efforts for earning living, isn't it too sad?
Further more, the life-time hired hiring system also has a neglect effect on the whole society. Suppose that if everyone in the society lose their desire to get progress, how would a society be like? It is true that Japan creates wonders of their economy, but in my opinion, it depends on the very character or the style of their country. After all, the cases differ from countries to countries. For most capitalistic countries, hiring employees for their life time is decidedly a harmless way of development.

?$tTo sum up, from any view , company, individual,or the society,the life-time hired system is unrealistic and do more harm than good. As far as i am concerned, only keeping a fresh energy, persistent effort and developed state can the whole world get better(elusive).|

lemon1kgUID: 2309820

非常感谢~我这两天看了各位战友的essay.发现自己问题超级多~观点不明确，词穷，表达不到位。。。
上帝保佑，最后十天，最好能到5分的水平。。。