issue56 today is the day 第二次作业#8tingtingjenny

tingtingjennyUID: 2431377

TOPIC: ISSUE56  - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."


People’s argument about the controversial issues of whether government should focus more on solving immediate problems or concerning more on solving the anticipated problems is never stopped. And I believe people with any opinion should consider the several following issues before they get a conclusion, and they might agree, the two aspects need to be kept in a balance and sometimes, they could be view as a unity.
                                                                                                            
To begin with, diligently and effectively solve immediate problems by government is crucial for the development of a nation. When individuals and community face with threaten from criminals or terrorist, government would use laws and economical pathway or even reaction in military to protect its populace. For example, after 9.11 affair American government react quickly in economy and political affairs to sustain the whole nation’s peaceful development. Also when nature catastrophe deprived populace's normal lives and destroyed their hometowns as actually happened in Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan China, government would react at the first moment to rescued suffered populations, Chinese government, for example, worked as quickly as possible to rescue the populations and to help the survivals to pass the difficult time of sorrow and disappointment, and appeal all populations nationally to help the suffered people. The government display its great importance and indispensable role to help populations and to rescue them from the emergencies and therefore, ensure peaceful development of the society.

Meanwhile, Government should not focus on contemporary issues exclusively; left along long term problems would compel the nation into an awkward situation. Take the oil for example, as contemporary social development system relys tremdously on the energy resource it possess, government who can find the most avaliabel amount of energy would dominant the international market, and intricate international political relationship only contribute to distort the commercial communication , were government are satisfied with fulfil prevalent appetite of the market, the resource deficient would cause nationally and internationally emergency in future. And high price of deficient resource would swept economy circulation and finally lead to overbearing economy and political pressure. were government do not step to solve future energy shortage and recall the acceleration of invention of replacing energies, people could easily imagine the great havoc of economy and industry suspending as well as peoples normal lives are threatened

Apparently, both the immediate issues and anticipated problems are indeed need to be concentrated, and to argue which one should be donated more concerns is unequal. body would declare that government should only react positively to the earthquake and passively to consider about the oil issues , nor could anyone convince people the importance of oil issue is surpassed suffered people and their lost home in Wenchuan. Because the both issues are relevant to the development of our nation, and ignore any of the two would probably prohibit the well being of the society.

In the other aspect, people should not forget sometimes the immediate problems are strictly accommodated with the anticipate problems in the future. When people are enjoying the Green Olympic in Beijing 2008, they might also are exciting to experience the fresh air in Beijing city. The city and national government had worked on improve the city’s air condition and reduce air pollution since 2001, the year Beijing has successfully applied 2008 Olympic Game. The process of resolving immediate pollution problems in previous years is one part of preparation for the Green Olympic Games. In short, when our governments are focus on solving immediate problems, they are equally dealing with the anticipated problems in future.

In sum, government should keep a balance on its focus on contemporary problems and future issues, since the two are all critical for the sound and peaceful development of the nation. And people should also not ignore the fact that in certain condition, whether government are focus on today’s emergency or future problems, they are in conformity to each other, and therefore, concerns on any one is feasible.

graceyc2000UID: 2149262

People’s argument about the controversial issues of whether government should focus more on solving immediate problems or concerning more on solving the anticipated problems is never stopped. And I believe people with any opinion should consider the several following issues before they get a conclusion, and they might agree, the two aspects need to be kept in a balance and sometimes, they could be view as a unity.

To begin with, diligently and effectively solve immediate problems by government is crucial for the development of a nation. When individuals and community face with threaten(threat) from criminals or terrorist, government would use laws and economical pathway or even reaction in military to protect its populace. For example, after 9.11 affair American government react quickly in economy and political affairs to sustain the whole nation’s peaceful development.（which measurement is taken into effect?） Also when nature catastrophe deprived populace's normal lives and destroyed their hometowns as actually happened in Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan China, government would react at the first moment to rescued suffered populations, Chinese government, for example, worked as quickly as possible to rescue the populations and to help the survivals to pass the difficult time of sorrow and disappointment, and appeal all populations nationally to help the suffered people. The government display its great importance and indispensable role to help populations and to rescue them from the emergencies and therefore, ensure peaceful development of the society. (nothing about the crucial in the topic sentence, I know you mean these things are crucial ,but no expansion or detailed discussion)

Meanwhile, Government should not focus on contemporary issues exclusively; left along long term problems would compel the nation into an awkward situation. Take the oil for example, as contemporary social development system relys tremdously on the energy resource it possess, government who can find the most avaliabel amount of energy would dominant the international market, and intricate international political relationship only contribute to distort the commercial communication , were government are satisfied with fulfil prevalent appetite of the market, the resource deficient would cause nationally and internationally emergency in future. And high price of deficient resource would swept economy circulation and finally lead to overbearing economy and political pressure. were government do not step to solve future energy shortage and recall the acceleration of invention of replacing energies, people could easily imagine the great havoc of economy and industry suspending as well as peoples normal lives are threatened (the example cited is very appropriate)

Apparently, both the immediate issues and anticipated problems are indeed need to be concentrated, and to argue which one should be donated more concerns is unequal. body would declare that government should only react positively to the earthquake and passively to consider about the oil issues , nor could anyone convince people the importance of oil issue is surpassed suffered people and their lost home in Wenchuan. Because the both issues are relevant to the development of our nation, and ignore any of the two would probably prohibit the well being of the society.

In the other aspect, people should not forget sometimes the immediate problems are strictly accommodated with the anticipate problems in the future. When people are enjoying the Green Olympic in Beijing 2008, they might also are exciting to experience the fresh air in Beijing city. The city and national government had worked on improve the city’s air condition and reduce air pollution since 2001, the year Beijing has successfully applied 2008 Olympic Game. The process of resolving immediate pollution problems in previous years is one part of preparation for the Green Olympic Games. In short, when our governments are focus on solving immediate problems, they are equally dealing with the anticipated problems in future.

In sum, government should keep a balance on its focus on contemporary problems and future issues, since the two are all critical for the sound and peaceful development of the nation. And people should also not ignore the fact that in certain condition, whether government are focus on today’s emergency or future problems, they are in conformity to each other, and therefore, concerns on any one is feasible.
本文的逻辑非常好，没有仅仅停留在说which is more imortant and should be payed more attention, 更进一步的的指出，其实两者可能具有内在的联系，使文章升华

xu5260711UID: 2465514

TOPIC: ISSUE56  - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."People’s argument about the controversial issues of whether government should focus more on solving immediate problems or concerning more on solving the anticipated problems is never stopped. And I believe people with any opinion should consider several following issues before they get a conclusion, and they might agree, the two aspects need to be kept in a balance and to some extent, they could be view as a unity.                                                                                                            
To begin with, solving immediate problems diligently and effectively by government is crucial for the development of a nation. When individuals and community face with threaten from criminals or terrorist, government would use laws, economical pathway or even reaction in military to protect its populace. For example, after 9.11 affair American government react quickly in economy and political affairs to maintain the whole nation’s peaceful development. Also when natural catastrophe deprived populace's normal lives and destroyed their hometowns as actually happened in Wen chuan earthquake in Sichuan China, government should react at the first moment to rescue suffered populations, Chinese government, for example, worked as quickly as possible to rescue the populations and to help the survivors to pass the difficult time of sorrow and disappointment, and appeal all populations nationally to help the suffered people. The government displays its great importance and indispensable to help populations and to rescue them from the emergencies and thereby, ensure peaceful development of the society.

Meanwhile, Government should not focus on contemporary issues exclusively; left along long term problems would compel the nation into an awkward situation. Take the oil for example, as contemporary social development system relies tremendously on the energy resource it possesses, government which can find the most available amount of energy would dominant the international market, and the intricate international political relationship only contribute to distort the commercial communication , were government are satisfied with fulfill prevalent appetite of the market, the deficient resource would cause nationally and internationally emergency in future. And high price of deficient resource would destroy economy circulation and finally lead to enormouseconomic and political pressure. were government do not step to solve future energy shortage and recall the acceleration of invention of replacing energies, people could easily imagine the great havoc of economy and industry as well as peoples normal lives are threatened

Apparently, both the immediate issues and anticipated problems are indeed need to be concentrated, and to argue which one should be donated more concerns is meaningless. Somebody would declare that government should not only react positively to the earthquake and passively to consider about the oil issues, nor could anyone convince people the importance of oil issue surpasses suffered people and their lost home in Wenchuan. Because the both issues are relevant to the development of our nation, and ignore any of the two would probably prohibit the well being of the society.In the other aspect, people should not forget sometimes the immediate problems are strictly accommodated with the anticipate problems in the future. When people are enjoying the Green Olympic in Beijing 2008, they might also are exciting to experience the fresh air in Beijing city. The city and national government had worked on improving the city’s air condition and reduce air pollution since 2001, the year Beijing has successfully applied 2008 Olympic Game. The process of resolving immediate pollution problems in previous years is one part of preparation for the Green Olympic Games. In short, when our governments are focus on solving immediate problems, they are equally dealing with the anticipated problems in future.
(楼主这里阐述的大概是解决了眼前问题，也就解决了未来的问题。但是我觉得举奥运会的例子好像不太好，我也说不上来。我觉得还不如谈谈前人种树，后人乘凉更有意义，也就是解决了目前的问题，对解决以后的问题有帮助，甚至会比避免那些问题)
In sum, government should keep a balance on its focus on contemporary problems and future issues, since the two are all crucial for the peaceful development of the nation. And people should also not ignore the fact that in certain condition, whether government are focus on today’s emergency or future problems, they are in conformity to each other, and therefore, concerns on any one is feasible.

我觉得作者的逻辑方面没有太大问题。主要就挑了一些语言问题，按照自己的理解修改了一些。嗯恩，写得不错呢，注意一下语言肯定5分以上。