UPenn的规划和国内的区别还是很大的（附上已经出来的科目syllabus）

依风而来UID: 2211667

Penn的bootcamp已经结束，最近开始准备正式的课程了，目前已经出了两门的syllabus，我的感觉是和国内的城规区别很大，我已经是urban design方向的了，但core courses还是有很多reading materials,于是这几天看paper看到要吐血:o
现发上一些这两门课syllabus的大概内容（根据实际情况略有删减，一切内容来自https://courseweb.library.upenn.edu/）
3 k2 S0 h& |& m" A- l' g( p
University of Pennsylvania
3 z4 h( H& W# |! RDepartment of City and Regional Planning
. {- |' D9 b/ v" e8 _
/ w) ?. s4 r5 o7 Z* zCPLN 540 /URBS 440/
) M* ^6 ?% o+ t# {) Y2 X" X                        
Introduction to City Planning: Past, Present, Future
+ J; g  z( J& y7 Q/ t  a; j! eTracing the evolution of modern planning, its practice and its results, this course will discuss its development within the context of American metropolitan growth.  Rising in response to late nineteenth century industrialization, the fledgling profession struggled to define its expertise, a battle that continued in the following decades.  The documentation of this effort shows how practitioners applied elements of design, engineering, law and the social sciences to create “the art and science” of planning.  Treating a subject so dynamic and confusing as the modern metropolis has not been an easy task. This study of the profession’s history, contemporary practice and future prospects will demonstrate enormous changes in the nature and content of the field, its varying expectations and its reception by American society.

When you have completed this class you will:

• Have an understanding of why, how, when and in what form the city planning profession emerged in the United States
• Have basic knowledge of the concerns that the city planning profession has addressed from the late 19th century to the present
• Have an introduction to the careers and work of the major practitioners and the contents of the influential city and regional plans that have informed the profession over time
• Have exposure to the work of contemporary planning practitioners, planning theoreticians and popular writers concerned with the field
• Have reviewed other parameters of the planning profession, including the AICP Code of Ethics
• Have presented two drafts and a final paper written  clearly and eloquently

The class will consist of two one-and-one-half class sessions divided into lecture and discussion. A note about course organization: The lectures will focus on delivering a chronological history of U.S. planning. Some readings will supplement this.  The discussions will use the historical matters as a platform from which modern issues have emerged.  Therefore many readings will relate to contemporary topics. Actually, the readings are those that I am assembling for publication in a Urban and Regional Planning Reader (Routledge, forthcoming.)  The class discussion will consist of reviewing the assigned readings, plus reports on supplementary items as assigned in class.  

9 p& T1 |% J% U) p0 e0 }8 c$ |General ReferencesThis list contains references that will assist you in pursuing individual interests. This is, by no means, a comprehensive and definitive list, it just contains suggestions of the range in the literature of planning.

0 ^% ^" Y; z5 H- r$ P: Y; P0 f$ X4 tAlice Sparberg Alexiou, Jane Jacobs, Urban Visionary (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2006).
% A+ f& I% B4 {  f1 d- o6 E
American Planning Association, Planning and Urban Design Standards (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2006).
$ q- e5 S; e# n) R1 O
- [0 y" s7 h" w& x- I" f4 |1 z2 N8 W" ZEdmund N. Bacon, Design of Cities (New York: Penguin Books, 2004 (originally issued 1976).

( X+ Z% z7 h1 ~* S* b5 `6 g1 @Jonathan Barnett (editor), Planning for a New Century, The Regional Agenda (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2001).
! }* ?; {8 S; U: F$ Y
Phillip R. Berke, David R. Godschalk and Edward J. Kaiser, Urban Land Use Planning (Fifth Edition) (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2006).

/ C; ?2 n9 j5 U6 p: L" c- K3 Y3 VEugenie L. Birch and Susan Wachter (editors), Rebuilding Urban Places After Disaster, Lessons from Katrina (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).

Peter Calthorpe and William Fulton, The Regional City, Planning for the End of Sprawl (Washington, D.C. Island Press, 2001).

7 e! u1 T" E# S, E! s0 N9 KAdam Cohen and Elizabeth Taylor, American Pharaoh, Mayor Richard J. Daley, His Battle for Chicago and the Nation (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 2000).

Barbara Faga, Building Public Consensus, The Civic Theater of Community Participation for Architects, Landscape Architects, Planners and Urban Designers (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2006).

( M4 I5 G- D2 I( |# p3 LRobert Fishman (editor), The American Planning Tradition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press: 2000).
' z% e$ |# q) B. T
Alexander Garvin, The American City, What Works, What Doesn’t  (New York: McGraw Hill, 2002).
/ h. |% |# ]0 {8 e* V# l
Peter Hall, Cities of Tomorrow, An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth  Century  (New York: Basil Blackwell: 1988).

Charles Hoch, Frank So and Linda Dalton (editors), Practice of Local Government Planning (Washington, DC: International City Managers Association, 2000).
# Y# f3 S  k3 V1 ~- J' s
Lewis D. Hopkins, Urban Development, The Logic of Making Plans (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2001).

Alison Isenberg, Downtown America A History of the Place and the People Who Made It(Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 2004).

Kenneth T. Jackson (editor), Encyclopedia of New York City (New Haven: Yale University Press: 1995).
  q: b; B- r4 d8 B( W7 \4 \
9 U7 n  f. t' o4 vDonald A. Krueckeberg (editor),  Introduction to Planning History (New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, 1983).
2 m% k; k% `: r9 e0 `
Donald A. Krueckeberg (editor), The American Planner: Biographies and Recollections (second edition) (New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, 1994).
/ }  }, ^$ I) ~7 p; J) \
) ~; l; J# H* u2 O; }Kevin M. Kruse and Thomas J. Sugrue (editors), The New Suburban History (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006).

William H. Lucy and David L. Phillips, Tomorrow’s Cities, Tomorrow’s Suburbs (Chicago: APA Planners’ Press, 2006).

Lewis Mumford, The City in History  (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961).

Jon A. Peterson, The Birth of City Planning in the United States 1840-1917 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 2003).  
3 F( Z3 N5 o0 Z( Z' g
Planning Exchange, The New Towns Record; 1846-1996, Fifty Years of UK New Town Development (Glasgow, 1997).
7 k$ E% }$ F7 O/ q1 B7 y; v
Lloyd Rodwin and Biswarpriya Sanyal (editors), The Profession of City Planning, Changes, Images and Challenges: 1950-2000 (New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, 2000).
, s+ \$ g+ e4 E" L' `; K& b, T- F
Biswarpriya Sanyal (editor), Comparative Planning Cultures (London: Routledge, 2005).

Mary Corbin Sies and Christopher Silver (editors),  Planning the Twentieth-Century American City (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1996).
2 J' L. v) h2 `% o& `
Mel Scott, American City Planning Since 1890   (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).

4 o" ?4 g. U) D- w6 jWilliam S. Saunders (editor), Urban Planning Today ( Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006).
0 c! a$ j$ K8 |) U! `/ S
6 ~8 q6 |  ]) pJay Stein (editor), Classic Readings in City Planning (Chicago: Planners Press, 2004).
1 B- p+ J! [9 l1 r9 V6 e  _
( Y; Z2 x. w2 _4 L8 \; \/ SThomas J. Sugrue, The Origins of the Urban Crisis, Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).

9 t; ~# P# a/ u3 ?& ZJon C. Teaford, The Rough Road to Renaissance, Urban Revitalization in America 1940-1985 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1990).
+ h3 I' C, Z( N8 l- p. ^/ P
" \/ `. b2 _* \6 m8 k% p& z6 vStephen V. Ward, Planning the Twentieth Century City (West Sussex: John Wiley, 2002).
- p3 i" n: J6 a2 \) S6 n
In addition to these monographs, there are several websites that should be of assistance to you in this class. A short list is:
1 j1 F' [2 |" X! w" s% S' RThis one is OUTSTANDING: http://www.planetizen.com
' N' Y3 M( C3 `2 AOthers are:
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ENVI/histplan.html
http://www.library.cornell.edu/Reps/DOCS/homepage.html
8 o8 e) F; {3 N4 E6 h( ihttp://www.uwm.edu/~frankn/acsp/html
http://www.planning.org
  o5 `+ {% F4 _7 c! q
内容我就贴出来这些吧，具体的放在附件里

依风而来UID: 2211667

接着是另外一门课的，比较让人头大的是如果在国内学的城规是偏设计的，这门课会让你狂晕，还有bootcamp里的statistics，效果和这个差不多，或者说有过之而无不及～:rolleyes:
6 v4 h7 U8 Q; }0 T2 ^2 b

CPLN 633: Urban & Regional Economics

& y- y8 m4 M, [: D* _  J) @Course Description
) R' h1 A: X+ p6 A3 P. ]9 J+ ~The notion of city planning pre-supposes government involvement in the provision of infrastructure and amenities; in the regulation and shaping of urban development; in efforts to promote health and welfare through land use and environmental regulation; and (for many) in efforts to ensure that political power and economic resources are distributed equitably. Yet most planners practice in societies where resource allocation is governed primarily by markets. We study economics in city planning because it offers powerful (though frequently controversial) tools to guide decisions about when and how government should be involved in providing or subsidizing services and in shaping market activity. CPLN 633 introduces students to the distinct economic principles and vocabularies that planners rely on, and familiarizes them with local government taxation, budgeting and borrowing practice.

Learning Objectives
In this course, students will:
8 R* d0 z! i$ T, J( w" G3 w

• Become familiar withthe principles and theories of welfare economics, public economics and land/spatial economics.
• Use these theories and principles to analyze metropolitan and city form, public sector service provision, development regulation, and urban housing and economic development policies.
• Come to understand the principles and practice of municipal taxation, budgeting and borrowing

/ u, m" n) I( C3 l0 \; ZAssignments/Methods of Assessment

There will be three assignments, due September 24, November 12 and December 8th. Each of these will count for 20% of the final grade. The final exam, to be given Thursday December 11 from 9-11 a.m., will count for 40% of the final grade.

# P7 ^7 x3 a. p% ^. g2 C/ u" bSchedule at a glance:
& R* j* \% U0 o8 N' R2 V) i

Part 1: Welfare and public sector economics
1 September 3	Introduction – Markets, planning, efficiency, equity ; Z2 [" h+ H$ r- {
2 September 8 & 10 ' w9 x: L* ^9 Z, b7 q  z5 q( @	Public goods, public choice, public provision; Local public goods and the Tiebout Hypothesis - e( T2 ]# n$ l# w" c/ F6 a. Y
3 September 15 & 17	Externalities; the market failure argument for land use planning
Part 2: The Economics of Urban Form, Location and Land Use : f8 S4 z. X. o- b
4 September 22 & 24	ASSIGNMENT 1 DUE September 24Urban and metropolitan form; the growth and structure of cities; city competitiveness
5 September 29 and October 1	Dynamics of urban growth and development -- the monocentric model and beyond % w1 u! ~  W8 ], R4 B* `, |$ {8 h
6 October 6 & 8 + I/ y  B- P1 I7 s	Land Use Regulation and Growth Patterns;Policy approaches to managing urban development
7 October 13 & 15	Poverty, public services and the economics of central city isolation
Part 3: Local Public Finance   N; f4 D; I" L% X( F
8 October 20 & 22	Municipal budgets and fiscal policy 2 Z9 w1 v( D  i: x6 E8 \
9  October 27 & 29 % i% Q) B& e; N. ^& V0 q- j# H	Capitalization; impact fees; fiscal impact analysis 7 |2 X7 y, I1 J5 q1 D
10 November 3 & 5	Capital financing instruments 3 P. |# [" A7 {, [
Part 4: Housing and Neighborhood Economics 6 N2 S8 {5 c  |# h# W: L6 V
11 November 10 & 12 8 |* Q5 F" h+ U* Q) Y	ASSIGNMENT 2 DUE November 12 ) R7 ~! K" X7 A3 A3 W" UIntroduction to housing economics and policy Do we consume “too much” housing?
12 November 17 & 19	Spatial sorting, segregation and “moving to opportunity” policies. * m6 ~1 S, D, f) m8 m 6 n" E/ a( q( M7 E- T! G
13 November 24 & 26	Urban and metropolitan labor markets ' R' E% U1 t# L& ]9 {
14 December 1 & 3 8 J: w# C) P% }" K	Home ownership policy, mortgages and subprime lending ASSIGNMENT 3 DUE December 8

* E- F% ]5 U) Q; x" K( q: |- sSchedule of assignment due dates:

Date	Assignment
September 24	Assignment 1 on welfare and public sector economics
November 12	Assignment 2 on public finance and fiscal impact analysis
December 8	Assignment 3 on housing and neighborhood economics
December 11	Final Exam, 9:00-11:00 a.m.

* n1 u3 K" j: L& l, V+ J
Readings: Students should acquire Arthur O’Sullivan’s Urban Economics 5th or 6th edition.  (Boston: McGraw Hill).  The chapter notations on the syllabus are for the 6th edition; a handout provided at the first class meeting will give corresponding page numbers for the 5th edition. The remaining required readings are posted on the course Blackboard site.完整内容在附件里，这些对于设计类背景的规划系学生而言确实比较苦闷一些，还有待我们逐渐适应了～

[ 本帖最后由 依风而来 于 2008-9-2 12:28 编辑 ]

依风而来UID: 2211667

暂时就发这两门课了，回头等我的reading感觉不是那么苦闷之后再发一些其他的东西吧～;d:

wt19870530UID: 2529922

好像那边学的东西非常专业化很理论呢（英文没仔细看，太多了）

gongke_aeckUID: 2235130

慢慢来嘛，毕竟本科很少有学校这样专门锻炼过paper reading哦

TofelbabyUID: 2498323

城市规划在西方基本都是社会学领域的，除非是工程类的。在就业场上，划分跟清晰，规划就是社会经济规划，设计和设计草图是建筑专业的事，画图和结构是结构的类的事，机制图有专门的绘图员，责任明晰、工作重点突出，既轻松（不用全揽）也不悠闲（各有专攻）。在听John Friedmann的课时闲聊的感觉就是如此。当然，他代表的是偏理论的流派。

依风而来UID: 2211667

今天跟一个美国同学聊的时候他跟我说“In the US, Urban Planning is Economics and Economics is Urban Planning”，就是说他们的眼里Urban Planning是一种非常抽象和理论，而且带有政策性的东西～然后我问他本科学什么以及美国的Urban Planning教育，聊了不少之后发现他们的udergraduate degree是相当diverse的，甚至有个本科学History的哥们到Penn来读MCP，当然他也觉得这些reading比较horrible了～

wt19870530UID: 2529922

原来如此啊 不过城规出来比景观和建筑好找工作吧 而且待遇要好...

依风而来UID: 2211667

据说如此吧，事实还有待考证哈

gongke_aeckUID: 2235130

可以用这个稍微给自己打打气哦;) 关键还是看你学到了多少

wuwenhu13579UID: 2609740

貌似后面那门国内的那本书叫做经济地理学，只记得考试时狂背，很复杂，还好老师比较仁慈，考的数学简单，不然壁挂

crystal1208UID: 2611875

好东西～