COMEON小组--namejoe9.8号作业

namejoeUID: 2373013

Does study of animals help us to learn human nature?

With some similar behaviors between animals and our human beings, some people argue that study of animals would help us to learn human nature. As to me, I strongly disagree with this argument and the reasons are following.

The most important factor is that our human beings are so complicated than animals that hardly can we get any help to learn human nature with the animals’ research. Though sometimes we may behave simply just like the animals do, it is entirely possible that their behaviors would not stand for their true minds. Men are much more complicated than animals that they know how to cover their true feelings and make pretences. However, animals seldom act like this. For example, greedy is a kind of human nature. Due to its character of being easy criticized, people seldom behave greedily. This is quite different from animals in that animals would act more honestly than our human. So hardly can studying animals provide any help functions to research the human nature.

What's more, due to the complex society of our human beings, it is unlikely to get any help to research human nature by study animals. As we all know, our society is much more complicated than animals’ society. We have more complex social division of labor, thus different kinds of people are responsible for their own duties. Though some animals do own similar structure, like bees, they are much simpler than our society. For instance, in our human society, some people are forced to do what they are not interested, even hated, in order to survive. However, this phenomenon would seldom appear in animals’ society. So the complexity of our society determines the unlikelihood to gain helps to research human nature by simply studying animals.

In sum, our human beings as well as our society are much more complicated than animals. Thus it is unlikely go gain any help to research human nature by studying animals.

感觉第二部分论证的说服力不够,不知道如何深入,期待筒子们的看法.

devilkinelevenUID: 2442869

Does study of animals help us to learn human nature?

With some similar behaviors between animals and our human beings, some people argue that study of animals would help us to learn human nature. As to me, I strongly disagree with this argument and the reasons are following.

The most important factor is that our human beings are so complicated than animals that hardly can we get any help to learn human nature(长的复杂句，见水准） with the animals’ research（animal research）. Though sometimes we may behave simply just like the animals do, it is entirely possible that their behaviors would not stand for their true minds. Men are much more complicated than animals that they know how to cover their true feelings and make pretences. However, animals seldom act like this. For example, greedy（greediness） is a kind of human nature.（你不能这么说人吧？偶们都很greedy么？虽然是观点上的差异，可我看了不爽，不知道ETS看了会不会不爽，:-)） Due to its character of being easy criticized（这句不够清晰,its character指代什么明确写出来）, people seldom behave greedily. This is quite different from animals in that animals would act more honestly than our（we） human. So hardly can studying animals provide any help functions to research the human nature.

What's more, due to the complex society of our human beings, it is unlikely to get any help to research human nature by study animals. As we all know, our society is much more complicated than animals’ society. We have more complex social division of labor, thus different kinds of people are responsible for their own duties. Though some animals do own similar structure, like bees, they are much simpler than our society. For instance, in our human society, some people are forced to do what they are not interested, even hated, in order to survive. However, this phenomenon would seldom appear in animals’ society. So the complexity of our society determines the unlikelihood to gain helps to research human nature by simply studying animals.

In sum, our human beings as well as our society are much more complicated than animals. Thus it is unlikely go gain any help to research human nature by studying animals.

我是来看看拓宽思路的，没花大力气改。下面的继续哈~
lz的中心是说人和动物在复杂程度上的差异导致借鉴不可行，分两点，个人和社会，应该说条理很清楚了。只是有个问题，题目的字眼human nature提的太少，第二段里greediness是说human nature的，其他地方都没有直接阐述。

krasovskyUID: 2232937

Does study of animals help us to learn human nature?

With some similar behaviors between animals and our human beings, some people argue that study of animals would help us to learn human nature. As to me, I strongly disagree with this argument(statement?) and the reasons are following(are as follows?).

The most important factor is that our human beings are so complicated than animals that hardly can we get any help to learn human nature with(from?) the animals’ research(倒装用的好啊). Though sometimes we may behave simply just like (what) the animals do, it is entirely possible that their behaviors would not stand for their true minds(这里的their behaviors是在说人类还是动物，似乎不明确). Men are much more complicated than animals (个人感觉这里要加in)that they know how to cover their true feelings and make pretences. However, animals seldom act like this. For example, greedy is a kind of human nature. Due to its character(characteristic?) of being easy (easily being?)criticized, people seldom behave greedily. This is quite different from animals in that animals would act more honestly than our human. So hardly can studying animals provide any help functions to (the?) research (of?) the human nature.



What's more, due to the complex society of our human beings, it is unlikely to get any help to research human nature by study(studying) animals. As we all know, our society is much more complicated than animals’ society. We have more complex social division of labor, thus different kinds of people are responsible for their own duties. Though some animals do own similar structure, like bees, they are much simpler than our society. For instance, in our human society, some people are forced to do what they are not interested, even hated, in order to survive. However, this phenomenon would seldom appear in animals’ society. So the complexity of our society determines the unlikelihood to gain helps to research human nature by simply studying animals.


In sum, our human beings as well as our society are much more complicated than animals. Thus it is unlikely go gain any help to research human nature by studying animals.


先说好听的，个人感觉这篇文章写一边倒的观点不是很好写，但楼主的两个观点都很好，一个写人性本身，一个写社会性。

再说不好听的，楼主应该是限时写的吧，语言方面个人感觉还要加强（其实我语言也不好），有的句子不是很通顺。

我水平不高，说错的，改错的地方请见谅

namejoeUID: 2373013

呵呵，意见很中肯啊，多谢多谢~