argument94

nortromUID: 2591367

1．  1.调查的可信度
2．  2.临近街区和目标街区不具可比性
3．  3.增加漩涡浴盆和大厨房需要的成本
4．  4.不抱怨花园小不代表没有意见

In this argument, the president illustrates a series of facts that reveals the preference for a bathroom with a whirlpool pub and a large kitchen. And therefore he recommends to include them in all the new homes. He also suggests decreasing the size of yards to promote profit. However, there are several logical flaws in the argument that make it not so convincing as it seems to be.

To begin with, the president has not informed us with how the survey was carried out and the content of the survey. Perhaps the survey is designed for inquiring people’s suggestion about large kitchens. And it is definitely not proper to assume that most people like a large kitchen.

The author also claims that its competitor built home that included with bathroom with whirlpool pub and large kitchen. And these homes are sold faster and are sold at a higher price. Also this cannot be the reason for the author’s company do in the same way. Perhaps his competitor did not build all homes with such bathroom or kitchen. And these homes sold faster just because they are rare. If all the homes are built in this way, maybe it won’t be so fascinating. Even assuming that his competitor built all homes in the same way and sold well. It is strongly possible that the nearby development is a better place for living in and the average price is high. So people would love to pay a little more to own such a bathroom and kitchen. However, the current homes which the author’s company are constructing maybe are in a less popular block. Things could be very different.

Also questionable is the claim that building such bathroom and kitchen could increase profit. The author has not listed how much it will cost to include a bathroom with whirlpool pub and a large kitchen. Even though this behavior could promote selling, it is strongly possible that the profit can not make up for what has been cost in building these homes.

The final problem involves the claim that the company should decrease the size of yard since no buyer has complaint about that. It is possible that people has complaint but have not expressed them out. If the company takes this action, perhaps the buyers cannot tolerate anymore or they will just give up buying home from the company.

In sum, this argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it the author must provide evidence that: (1) The survey was designed for the right purpose and it is reliable. (2)The nearby development has the same condition with the target development. (3)Adding such bathroom and kitchen can promote profit. (4)People buying home from this company really do not need large yards. To better assess the argument, I would also need to know the consumption habits of people in this area and the average income of them, and more detail about the company.

words 489

slipingUID: 2584903

argument94

1．  1.调查的可信度 2．  2.临近街区和目标街区不具可比性 3．  3.增加漩涡浴盆和大厨房需要的成本 4．  4.不抱怨花园小不代表没有意见 In this argument, the president illustrates a series of facts that reveals the preference for a bathroom with a whirlpool pub and a large kitchen. And therefore he recommends to include them in all the new homes. He also suggests decreasing the size of yards to promote profit. However, there are several logical flaws in the argument that make it not so convincing as it seems to be. To begin with, the president has not informed us with how the survey was carried out and the content of the survey. Perhaps the survey is designed for inquiring people’s suggestion about large kitchens. And it is definitely not proper to assume that most people like a large kitchen. 这一段写得太草率 而且就算调查的是大厨房如果都不喜欢也会说啊 怎么就会不能说明喜欢大厨房呢 从调查的其他方面攻击吧 如样本的大小 覆盖的范围等是否能说明问题 The author also claims that its competitor built home that included with bathroom with whirlpool pub and large kitchen. And these homes are sold faster and are sold at a higher price. Also this cannot be the reason for the author’s company do in the same way. Perhaps his competitor did not build all homes with such bathroom or kitchen. And these homes sold faster just because they are rare. If all the homes are built in this way, maybe it won’t be so fascinating. Even assuming that his competitor built all homes in the same way and sold well. It is strongly possible that the nearby development is a better place for living in and the average price is high.没看懂是什么意思。那个是department吧 So people would love like to pay a little more to own such a bathroom and kitchen. However, the current homes which the author’s company are constructing maybe are in a less popular block. Things could be very different. Also questionable is the claim that building such bathroom and kitchen could increase profit. The author has not listed how much it will cost to include a bathroom with whirlpool pub and a large kitchen. Even though this behavior could promote selling, it is strongly possible that the profit can not make up for what has been cost in building these homes. The final problem involves the claim that the company should decrease the size of yard since no buyer has complaint about that. It is possible that people has complaint but have not expressed them out. If the company takes this action, perhaps the buyers cannot tolerate anymore or they will just give up buying home from the company. In sum, this argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it the author must provide evidence that: (1) The survey was designed for the right purpose and it is reliable. (2)The nearby development has the same condition with the target development. (3)Adding such bathroom and kitchen can promote profit. (4)People buying home from this company really do not need large yards. To better assess the argument, I would also need to know the consumption habits of people in this area and the average income of them, and more detail about the company.结尾很具体很清晰，很好。 words 489

收藏 分享 评分