寄托天下
查看: 1214|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[活动] 【09年1月-4月】TOEFL作文互改小组-之【TWE作文】2.1作业 by Quliette [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
154
注册时间
2008-8-20
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-2-1 18:31:17 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 nirvanahmj 于 2009-2-1 18:32 编辑

咱对综合写作不熟,写的挺纠结,望狂拍!先谢过。
About the theme whether the four-day workweek is good, the lecture and the passage holds different opinion: the passage says that the four-day workweek will help a lot while the lecture denies the conclusion from every point. Both of them talk about it from three aspects.

First, from the aspect of the individual companies, the passage holds that with the four-day workweek, the employees will be more rested and alert and for the employees require 80% of the salary, it won’t cost more to employ more staff to cover the surplus job. However, the lecture tells us that more staff means more expense on training, medical benefits, office spaces and computers which result in more spending and reduction of the profits. This gives an addition of the consideration of the passage and thus refutes the point.

Second, from the aspect of the whole country, the passage says that the four-day workweek will reduce the unemployment rates. But the lecture argues that since hiring employees is costly, the companies may require the current employees to work overtime or except them to do the 5-day work in 4days which leads to no growth of employment. This is a direct contradict of what the passage indicates.

Third, from the aspect of the employees who decided to take the option, the passage asserts that the four-day work week will improve the quality of their lives for they can have more leisure time to spend with their families and do things they have interests in. Nevertheless, even in this point, the lecture has something opposite. He indicates that those employees may take the risks of being harmed in career for their ability may be decreased. And they may lose chances of being promoted for the company prefers a 5-day worker as the supervisor. This shows us that the consideration of the passage is one sided and failed to get a good conclusion.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
1
寄托币
278
注册时间
2009-1-26
精华
0
帖子
7
沙发
发表于 2009-2-1 22:24:49 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 y61_smile 于 2009-2-2 15:35 编辑

占个楼  我们互改 我是46#  
谢谢你能改我作文

您的作文已改好。请在qq群里联系我给您发过去。
不传也不要紧,就这样就很好的作文了。
请您帮我改一下 实在不好意思

嗯,最后问一句,您是听了一遍在20min内写的么。。。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
146
寄托币
882
注册时间
2008-3-24
精华
2
帖子
22
板凳
发表于 2009-2-3 19:37:26 |只看该作者
不好意思  因为水平有限 实在看不出有什么问题来  
真的很汗颜~~

使用道具 举报

RE: 【09年1月-4月】TOEFL作文互改小组-之【TWE作文】2.1作业 by Quliette [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
【09年1月-4月】TOEFL作文互改小组-之【TWE作文】2.1作业 by Quliette
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-913609-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部