- 最后登录
- 2012-6-7
- 在线时间
- 127 小时
- 寄托币
- 326
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-3-16
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 14
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 372
- UID
- 2617025

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 326
- 注册时间
- 2009-3-16
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 14
|
1997-08-p5
Listen to part of a talk in an art history class.
You may remember that a few weeks ago, we discussed the question of what photography is.
Is it art, or is it a method of reproducing images?
Do photographs belong in museums or just in our homes?
Today, I want to talk about a person who tries to make his professional life an answer to such questions.
Alfred Stieglitz went from the United States to Germany to study engineering.
While he was there, he became interested in photography and began to experiment with his camera.
He took pictures under conditions that most photographers considered too difficult.
He took them at night, in the rain and people and objects reflected in windows.
When he returned to the United States, he continued these revolutionary efforts.
Stieglitz was the first person to photograph skyscrapers, clouds and views from an airplane.
What Stieglitz was trying to do in his photographs was what he tried to do throughout his life: make photography an art.
He thought that photography could be just as a good formal self-expression as painting and drawing.
For Stieglitz, his camera was his brush.
While many photographers of the late 1800s and early 1900s thought of their works as reproductions of identical images, Stieglitz saw his as a creative art form.
He understood the power of the camera to capture the moment.
In fact, he never retouched his prints or made copies of them.
If he were in this classroom today, I'm sure he'd say, "Well, painters don't normally make extra copies of their paintings, do they?"
1997-10-p5
Listen to part of a lecture in a geology class.
I'm glad you brought up the question of our investigations into the makeup of the earth's interior.
In fact, since this is the topic of your reading assignment for next time, let me spend these last few minutes of class talking about it.
There were several important discoveries in the early part of this century that help geologists develop a more accurate picture of the earth's interior.
The first key discovery had to do with seismic waves.
Remember, they are the vibrations caused by earthquakes.
Well, scientists found that they travel thousands of miles through the earth's interior.
This finding enabled geologists to study the inner parts of the earth.
You see, these studies revealed that these vibrations were of two types: compression or P-waves and shear or S-waves.
And researches found that P-waves travel through both liquids and solids, and S-waves travel only through solid matter.
In 1906, a British geologist discovered that P-waves slowed down at a certain depth and kept travelling deeper.
On the other hands, S-waves either disappeared or were reflected back.
So he concluded that the depth marked the boundary between the solid mantle and liquid core.
Three years later, another boundary was discovered, that between the mantle and the earth's crust.
There are still a lot to be learned about the earth.
For instance, geologists know that the core is hot.
Evidence of this is the molten lava that flows out of volcanoes.
But we are still not sure what the source of the heat is.
1998-01-p3
Listen to part of a lecture in a composition class.
By the end of the term, I hope you will be convinced as I am that formal writing always requires revision.
Sometimes it requires a fairly major rewriting of the paper.
Some students have the mistaken idea that revision means simply making corrections in spelling and grammar.
I call that proofreading.
What I expect you to do with your revise is to evaluate and improve the overall effectiveness of your paper.
But how can you tell if your paper is effective?
Well, for example, start by asking yourself these questions:
Is the topic restricted enough to be fully discussed within the given length?
Are the main ideas clear?
Are they supported by specific details and examples?
Do they move smoothly from one idea to the next?
You need enough time for a possible major overhaul.
That is you may have to make a lot of changes before your paper becomes really clear to the reader.
So I'll expect a preliminary draft of each paper two weeks before the final due date.
That way I can criticize it and get it back in time for you to revise it.
Then you can submit a final draft for grading.
This process may seem like a great deal of trouble at first, but I think you'll find it valuable.
In fact, after you finish this course, I doubt you will ever turn in a term paper without first revising it carefully.
18日听写.doc
(31.5 KB, 下载次数: 0)
|
|