- 最后登录
- 2012-11-26
- 在线时间
- 98 小时
- 寄托币
- 542
- 声望
- 2
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-25
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 431
- UID
- 2521740
 
- 声望
- 2
- 寄托币
- 542
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-25
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
本帖最后由 mqi07 于 2009-6-3 02:00 编辑
Marie Smith Jones, the last people(person) who spoke(n) the Eyak language, died in 2008 in Alaska,which announced that the languages were(this language was) completely extinct. Before that, Gaelg, Abdzakh and so on(some others是否更好) had been lost. A survey from UNESCO(United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) showed that more than two hundred languages which were lesser-used had been disappeared from the earth. To make things worse, the member from UNESCO alerted that there have been about 2500 sorts of languages facing the fate of vanishing. Based on the data, I agree with the statement that many of the world's lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. Following this further, the governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct for the reasons including the protection of culture, the benefits for their people and countries and even global developments.
Firstly, now in the age of globalization, more and more communications happen between different countries(不确定happen是否合适??? 但我觉得 用被动 are made 似乎更保险), consisted of culture, economics, etc. Strong civilizations influence vulnerable ones inevitably leading to the loss of cultural and political resources(两点:第一,从这段主题句来讲,我觉得influence做状语,而lead做谓语比较好;第二,这个逻辑不对,论证力度显然没有达到你的本意,仅仅是influence就能inevitably导致文化流失?太牵强了,你可以,要么把前面加重,要么后面别写那么绝对。). The languages in(是要表示属于吧?of更准) the vulnerable groups, as the most easy(easily 好像合成形容词都是这么组成的,你是查的材料还是自己想的?)-impacted form of civilization, are lost with a high speed. There is a need for the peoples in backward regions to learn a language(既然都是说和外国人交往,那就应该是 official/common language) to exchange (加个information是否更通顺)with others from countries all over the world. So they do not have enough time to study their own languages(你这句是个小结论,但和段末的结论一样了。就是说,这句话后面的也是这句话的论据,所以可以去掉此句,然后在中间加个连词,就和下一句并列做论据). When the instruments(用means 表方式 ,手段。 抽象具体的都适合。但instrument,指仪器,乐器。而且你后面马上跟了 internet,用instrument就更不对了) for transferring information, such as TV, Internet, audio and so on, are widely used in their daily life, they will have little time to study and make use of their own languages. Therefore, the lesser-used languages disappear gradually.
Secondly, a language is a significant portion of culture. It expresses meanings of stories, myths, legends, fables, poetry, lyrics, riddles, drama and etc. It is the carrier and the foundation(两词位置换一下更好吧) of culture. Like the biological diversity, culture, or said a language(???), also has its diversity. When the languages vanish, we will lose our precious fortune which provides us (加个with。只见过 provide sb with sth)comparisons to distinguish and improve our culture, (and去掉更好) inspiration and creativity. Besides, a language is a direct manifestation of the way we think. [Astronomy, geography, geometry, and the world and life thinking(什么意思???), which is(are) based on the manifestation and records of languages, includes the language user's cognitive system of the objective world.](对最后这句分析主谓宾:基于...的学科和... , 包括了...系统。而且和你上句话没承接好,讨论时在具体谈吧,这块我想说的挺多???)
Finally, what can the governments get or what can the society and people( be )benefit是动词 benefit from the protections of the languages? As a person of a people which has a disappearing language, the more time he/she studies his/her native language, the less time and energy he/she learns other languages to fill the need of his/her people's development, but he can be full of two or more different kinds or styles of culture which they can (be) benefit from(没懂,弄不清为什么用but???); as a government which has such peoples, it do not need to limit the transferring of vulnerable civilizations in order to adapt to the globalization. However, the governments can strong(是strengthen吧) these peoples through disseminating their unique and valued culture which even can make its country stronger and richer.
To sum up, preserving a dangerous language is , admittedly, a worthy goal. It can maintain the diversity of the culture in the world and the languages can express people' minds no matter whether their group or people is small or big, backward or developed. Further more, the governments should act to prevent these languages extinct, devoting their time and resources elsewhere, and leaving their people themselves all to take participate in.
蓝色是好的句子, 但我只挑了好句中的一两个出来
三个问号的是有待讨论的
加强语言吧,我们现在共同的缺点哟 |
|