写作词汇，句式表达的battle

alexleoUID: 2635657

作文也写了3i 3a。感觉极其不痛快，就算有着流畅的提纲，也不能直抒胸臆。表达表达始终不达标，
历史的经验告诉我们，坐以待毙的人必死无疑！穷则思变，
下决心斩杀写作词汇，句式。初期，可能不得其法，然而也是在借鉴前辈的思想的基础上了。
行不行都得把剑亮了，岂能让小小的词汇毁我？！
跟summer同志合作下，
期待效果......
summer 同学的作业完成情况记录
第一周6.10   完成 恰好50个

summer526zjUID: 2628377

嗯 做个记号

feiyuegreUID: 2447673

?不知两位所云。。。:L

alexleoUID: 2635657

本次agument写作词汇小总结（来源于下面的官方范文）
1 indicate  2 cite  3 area  4mention  5likewise  6mitigate 7 thoroughly 8subsequently 9logical 10alternatives 11age bracket 12conductive 13geographical and physical terrain 14perhaps 15regardless of 16 time frame 17and therefore 18again 19 also 20 in reference to 21overall 22evaluate 23previously 24intermediate steps 25examine 26amount to 27upon 28ascertain
29In turn  30then continue 3 1reason 32 come to a conclusion 33 address 34 one-side 35boost 36overlook 37chose to ignore 38 recognize 39potentially 40ntilize 41on the other hand 42peacefulness43 destroy the benefit/ reap the benefit /grand benefits 44somehow45rationalize46 arguable 47 ambience 48as a whole 49 sway 50asset 51 accomplish
小小感悟：
很多的单词貌似很熟悉，实际上并不会用，例如reason also这类
在初期，我得把这些貌似会用的真正会用。

alexleoUID: 2635657

The agrument is well-presented, but not thoroughly well-reasoned. By making a comparison of the region of Forestville, the town with the higher speed limit and therefore automobile accidents, with the region of Elmsford, an area of a lower speed limit and subsequently fewer accidents, the argument for reducing Forestville's speed limits in order to decrease accidents seems logical.
(Thoroughly ad. 彻底地, 绝对地, 透彻地, 详尽地, 周到地, 完全地, 完善地, 全面地/
subsequently adv.
其后,随后,接着
It subsequently emerged that he had known about the deal all along.
随后的情况显示他一直都知道这件事情。
Nearly one hundred of them were subsequently tried,convicted and imprisoned.
其中近一百人后来受到审讯、判刑和监禁。
Brooke was arrested and subsequently sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.
布鲁克被逮捕,其后被判五年监禁。)


However, the citizens of Forestville are failing to consider other possible alternatives (?)to the increasing car accidents after the raise in speed limit. Such alternatives may include the fact that there are less reliable cars traveling the roads in Forestville, or that the age bracket(年龄组，两个年龄段之间的人) of those in Elmsford may be more conducive to driving safely. It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than there are in Elmsford. In addition, the citizens have failed to consider the geographical and physical terrain of the two different areas. Perhaps Forestville's highway is in an area of more dangerous curves, sharp turns, or has many intersections （十字路口，交叉路口）or merging points where accidents are more likely to occur. It appears reasonable, therefore, for the citizens to focus on these trouble spots than to reduce the speed in the entire area. Elmsford may be an area of easier driving conditions where accidents are less likely to occur regardless of the speed limit.
(Alternatives 供选方案
Conducive
making a certain situation or outcome likely or possible
有助于…的；有益于…的
the harsh lights and cameras were hardly conducive to a relaxed atmosphere.
刺目的灯光和闪光灯不利于营造轻松气氛。)

A six-month period is not a particularly long time frame for the citizens to determine that speed limit has influenced the number of automobile accidents in the area. It is mentioned in the argument that Elmsford accidents decreased during the time period. This may have been a time, such as during harsh weather conditions, when less people were driving on the road and therefore (因此)the number of accidents decreased. However, Forestville citizens, perhaps coerced by employment or other requirements, were unable to avoid driving on the roads. Again,（av，此外，另一方面） the demographics of the population are important. It is possible that Elmsford citizens do not have to travel far from work or work from their home, or do not work at all. Are there more people in Forestville than there were sic months ago? If so, there may be an increased number of accidents due to more automobiles on the road, and not due to the increased speed limits. Also（adv 同样） in reference to （关于）the activities of the population, it is possible that Forestville inhabitants were traveling during less safe times of the day, such as early in the morning, or during twilight. Work or family habits may have encouraged citizens to drive during this time when Elmsford residents may not have been forced to do so.
(Time frame 期限。
Again ■
[sentence adverb]used to introduce a further point for consideration, supporting or contrasting with what has just been said.
再则，而且
I never saw any signs, but then again , maybe I wasn't looking.
我从没看到什么标记，不过再说，我可能当时也没在看。
Also adv 同样，例句见文中。

conj.
1. 又;并且
Also, he has gone abroad.
再者,他已去了)


Overall, the reasoning behind decreasing Forestville's speed limit back to its original seems logical as presented above since the citizens are acting in their own best interests and want to protect their safety. However, before any final decisions are made about the reduction in speed limit, the citizens and officials of Forestville should evaluate（评价估计） all possible alternatives and causes for the increased number of accidents over the six-month period as compared to Elmsford.
(Overall av 大体上，总的来说。)
The argument above presents a sound case for arguing that if the region of Forestville wants to reduce the number of automobile accidents on the region's highways, they should consider reducing the speed limit to what it was before the increase in speed limit took place 6 months previously. However, there are some intermediate steps（中间级） that one could take before jumping to the conclusion that reducing the speed limit is the only way in which traffic accidents can be reduced.
(Previously adv 事先以前)


First of all, I would examine the actual number of traffic accidents that occurred before and after the speed limit increase and compare this to the size of the region and its driving population. For example, if the Forestville region's driving population is 1 million people, and the traffic accidents for a 6-month period before the speed increase totaled 100, then the 15% increase would amount to an additional 16 traffic accidents, or 116 total. For a population of 1 million, there may be other solutions to this increase besides reducing the speed limit to what it was. (The comparison to the region of Elmsford would only be helpful if the regions driving demography is comparable in terms of size and scope.) A public education campaign emphasizing driver safety and safe driving techniques may suffice to reduce the number of traffic accidents. Especially considering that if the number of accidents relative to the population is somewhat small, it is a fairly safe driving population anyway.
(Amount to 意味着
Examine 仔细检查)

In addition, I would consider lengthening the time of the study. Six months may be a relatively short period of time for which to study the rate of traffic accidents. Upon a closer examination of when the accidents occurred, one might ascertain that most of the driving accidents occurred within a month of raising the speed limit, but that there have been relatively few additional accidents since that first phase-in period. Lengthening the study to a one-year period would help adjust for any untypical statistics and paint a more accurate picture of the long-term affects of the speed limit increase.
( Ascertain 弄清查明)
I would also examine what else was occurring in the region during the period of the study. For example, was there a major highway construction project happening during this time which would have added to the unsafe nature of raod travel? Are there any alternative explanations for why the increase in traffic accidents could have occurred, or is the increase in speed limit the sole variable? Looking at the type of accidents that occurred, I would examine whether these are the types of car accidents one would expect from traveling at a faster speed to corroborate the cause and effect relationship.
6、
This letter to the editor begins by stating the reasons the residents of Morganton voted to keep Scott Woods in an undeveloped state. The letter states that the entire community could benefit from an undeveloped parkland. The residents of the town wanted to ensure that no shopping centers or houses would be built there. This, in turn,（反过来） would provide everyone in the community with a valuable resource, a natural park.

The letter then continues by addressing the issue of building a school on the land. The author reasons that this would also benefit the entire community as a natural parkland since much of the land would be devoted to athletic fields. The author of the letter comes to the conclusion that building a school on the land would be the best thing for everyone in the community.
(address
reason ■[with obj.](reason something out)find an answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions.
推论出，推断出；讲出…的道理
Come to a conclusion 得到结论)
This letter is a one-sided argument about the best use of the land known as Scott Woods. The author may be a parent whose child would benefit from a new school, a teacher who thinks a school would boost the community, or just a resident of Morganton. Regardless of who the author is, there are many aspects of this plan that he or she has overlooked （忽视）or chosen to ignore.
( One-sided 片面的
Boost
Vt 提高改善。)
Using a piece of land to build a school is not the same thing as using it for a natural parkland. While all the members of the community could potentially （潜在地可能地）benefit from a parkland, only a percentage of the population would realistically benefit from a new school. The author fails to recognize people like the senior citizens of the community. What interest do they have in a new school? It only means higher taxes for them to pay. They will likely never to and utilize（利用） the school for anything. On the other hand, anyone can go to a park and enjoy the natural beauty and peacefulness. The use of the land for a school would destroy the benefit （损害利益）of a park for everyone. In turn, it would supply a school only to groups of people in exactly the right age range, not too young or too old, to reap the benefits.

Another point the author stresses is that the use of the land for things like athletic fields somehow rationalizes the destruction of the park. What about children who don't play sports? Without the school, they could enjoy the land for anything. A playing field is a playing field. Children are not going to go out there unless they are into sports. There are many children in schools who are not interested in or are not able to play sports. This is yet another group who will be left out of the grand benefits of a school that the author talks about.
( rationalize vt.
使合理化
I can’t rationalize my absurd fear of insects.
我怕昆虫,毫无道理,不能合理地解释。)
The author's conclusion that "there would be no better use of land in our community than this...""is easily arguable. The destruction of Scott Woods for the purpose of building a school would not only affect the ambience(环境，气氛) of Morganton, it would affect who would and would not be able to utilize the space. If the residents as a whole voted to keep Scott Woods in an undeveloped state, this argument will not sway their decision. The use of the land for a school will probably benefit even less people than a shopping center would. The whole purpose of the vote was to keep the land as an asset(有价值的事物)  for everyone. The only way to do this is to keep it in an undeveloped state. Using the land for a school does not accomplish this.
(As a whole
as a single unit and not as separate parts; in general
作为一个整体；整体看来，总体上
a healthy economy is in the best interests of society as a whole.
健康发展的经济总的来说对社会最有利。)