- 最后登录
- 2009-12-11
- 在线时间
- 242 小时
- 寄托币
- 388
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2009-4-26
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 328
- UID
- 2633778
 
- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 388
- 注册时间
- 2009-4-26
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
Artistic creations play a very significant role in the civil development of humanity and society. Psychologically, art enhances life by adding beauty to our surrounding. Socially, Art has an effect by virtue of its capacity to embody symbolic significance to its audience, at the same time, Art fulfills a number of important educational function. Art is also employed as a means for historic function. Artic(artist) and critic both have, to same extent, different contribution to society on the art.
As for art beauty function, artic(artist)creates creation full of contemporary social situation and social culture by means of their own sensitivity, insight and creativity, but artists often create a particular piece based purely on their own personal desire for self—expression, Sometimes to the point of expressing disdain for what the vox populi states, leading to among the mass, there is few who understand and appreciate the creation. At this time, critic as a bridge between artist and people interpret the thought, elite of the work. So I think at this point, it is artic and critic who give the social something of lasting value.
However, if taking historic value of works into consideration. We should spend a few time thinking that it is artist or critic who gives the social something of lasting value. (这段的ts不是很明确啊,是共同论述两者的优点么还是单独论述艺术家的优点)Some of the art works show artists own personal emotion, feeling. But some of them reflect the development trends of society or the subjective truth. Sometimes, it is only as a record means of history such <<Notre-Dame de Paris>> record the bizarre life in paris(地名大写). Critic(复数加s) do criticism for those which tends to undermine and constrain the artist’s creativity and imagination because critic’s personal like and recognition may give artist limited and misleading feedback. As a fact(as a matter of fact), only time can give those works a equal, subjective criticism (是不是应该是equal , subjective evaluation或者assessment?), at the same time evaluate social lasting value that artists create.
At last, besides the above lasting value artists bring to society, there is another value—educational function coming into my eyes. Many artists who create their works are in a poor life without funding, many artists difficultly survive in the marketplace. such as Van Gogh whose
persistent encourage generations. And then taking Beethoven as another example, although at last, his ear can’t hear anything, It (小写)is at his last period that he creates his marvel symphony. Their spirit(s) also is the social lasting value and at this point, it is artists who give society something of lasting value.
To sum up, the lasting value of at have many kinds of(这句话看不懂……). Without limiting the value range, we can’t identify it is artist or critic who gives the society something of lasting value. It may be either artist or critic, or both of them contribute to the society something of lasting value
结尾这个是不是观点不明确,可能是艺术家,或者是批评家,或者是两个同时……
整篇的思路:
1在美学角度论述两者
2在历史角度论述两者
3在教育的角度论述两者
第一次看到这样的思路,但是觉得还是蛮新颖的。但在每段中笔墨还是着重了艺术家的作用,评论家提及的较少。 |
|