0910G [Just do it] Argument173 by houpei0126

houpei0126UID: 2643060

The following is a memorandum issued by the publisher of a newsmagazine, Newsbeat, in the country of Dinn.

"Our poorest-selling magazine issues over the past three years were those that featured international news stories on their front covers. Over the same period, competing news-magazines have significantly decreased the number of cover stories that they devote to international news. Moreover, the cost of maintaining our foreign bureaus to report on international news is increasing. Therefore, we should decrease our emphasis on international news and refrain from displaying such stories on our magazine covers."

The author of this argument claims that the newsmagazine should decrease their emphasis on international news and refrain from displaying such stories on their magazine covers. To support this claim the author cites certain statistics about their poorest-selling were featured international news on their front cover and other evidences. Close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little credible support for the author's assertion.
The author bases her claim partly on the fact that their poorest-selling magazine issues over the past three years were those that featured international news stories on their front covers. It is just simply impose all the problems to the covers, because covers in only one features of a magazine. it is equally possible that most readers care more about the content of the magazines, or the text of the reporter is so boring or the affairs are out of date that can’t meet the reader’s tastes. Besides, the author does not provide any number of the sales, or maybe it’s just a small decline that can’t reach this conclusion.
The argument also assumes unfairly that the competing news-magazines have significantly decreased the number of cover stories of international news. And no evidence provide to show that these competing news-magazines’ sales or profits have increased. In addition, decreased international cover story didn’t represent they concern little about the national affairs; it’s likely that they designed some special topic
or some detailed information in the magazines which will take much pages but only a short theme on the covers, so from the number of cover stories the arguer can’t assert the decrease of national stories. Since the arguer fails to rule out these and other possible explanations for it, I can’t convince the conclusion.
What’s more, the increasing cost of maintaining foreign bureaus to report on international news doesn't mean such kind of costs should be decreased in order to make profits. First, no evidence show that this increasing trends will lasting and the company can’t afford for it, it’s reasonable that the cost of international report changed as the political or economy condition of the whole world. Even if the cost continue to increasing, it’s still unwise to decrease emphasis on international news. Because the world is changing almost every day, without a strength sustentation to the rapid changing, the efficiency and validity of the company will be much influenced. The final result must be that their consumers lose a lot.

In conclusion, the author's evidence lends little credible support to her claim. To reach this decision, the author must provide us more detailed information about the poorest-selling magazines and the competing magazines like the content or the sale number. Again, whatever, the evidence of increasing costs is unreasonable. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.

dodoluluUID: 2641270

The author of this argument claims that the newsmagazine should decrease their emphasis on international news and refrain from displaying such stories on their magazine covers 把原文修改一下比较好吧. To support this claim the author cites certain statistics about their poorest-selling were featured international news on their front cover and other evidences. Close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little credible support for the author's assertion.

The author bases her? claim partly on the fact that their poorest-selling magazine issues over the past three years were those that featured international news stories on their front covers. It is just simply impose all the problems to the covers, because cover is only one feature of a magazine. it is equally possible that most readers care more about the content of the magazines, or the text of the reporter is so boring or the affairs are out of date that can’t meet the reader’s tastes. Besides, the author does not provide any number of the sales, or maybe it’s just a small decline that can’t reach this conclusion.

The argument also assumes unfairly that the competing news-magazines have significantly decreased the number of cover stories of international news. And no evidence provided to show that these competing news-magazines’ sales or profits have increased. In addition, decreased international cover story didn’t represent they concern little about the international affairs; it’s likely that they designed some special topic
or some detailed information in the magazines which will take much pages but only a short theme on the covers, so from the number of cover stories the arguer can’t assert the decrease of international stories. Since the arguer fails to rule out these and other possible explanations for it, I can’t convince the conclusion.

What’s more, the increasing cost of maintaining foreign bureaus to report on international news doesn't mean such kind of costs should be decreased in order to make profits. First, no evidence show that this increasing trends will lasting and the company can’t afford for it, it’s reasonable that the cost of international report changed as the political or economy condition of the whole world. Even if the cost continue to increasing, it’s still unwise to decrease emphasis on international news. Because the world is changing almost every day, without a strength sustentation to the rapid changing, the efficiency and validity of the company will be much influenced. The final result must be that their consumers lose a lot.

In conclusion, the author's evidence lends little credible support to her claim. To reach this decision, the author must provide us more detailed information about the poorest-selling magazines and the competing magazines like the content or the sale number. Again, whatever, the evidence of increasing costs is unreasonable. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.

这篇a写的很好，没有什么大毛病，继续努力哈

houpei0126UID: 2643060

The author of this argument claims that the newsmagazine should decrease and refrain from displaying national news on their magazine covers. To support this claim the author cites certain statistics about their poorest-selling were featured international news on their front cover and other evidences. Close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little credible support for the author's assertion.

The author bases her or his claim partly on the fact that their poorest-selling magazine issues over the past three years were those that featured international news stories on their front covers. It is just simply impose all the problems to the covers, because cover is only one feature of a magazine. it is equally possible that most readers care more about the content of the magazines, or the text of the reporter is so boring or the affairs are out of date that can’t meet the reader’s tastes. Besides, the author does not provide any number of the sales, or maybe it’s just a small decline that can’t reach this conclusion.

The argument also assumes unfairly that the competing news-magazines have significantly decreased the number of cover stories of international news. And no evidence provided to show that these competing news-magazines’ sales or profits have increased. In addition, decreased international cover story didn’t represent they concern little about the international affairs; it’s likely that they designed some special topic
or some detailed information in the magazines which will take much pages but only a short theme on the covers, so from the number of cover stories the arguer can’t assert the decrease of international stories. Since the arguer fails to rule out these and other possible explanations for it, I can’t convince the conclusion.

What’s more, the increasing cost of maintaining foreign bureaus to report on international news doesn't mean such kind of costs should be decreased in order to make profits. First, no evidence show that this increasing trends will lasting and the company can’t afford for it, it’s reasonable that the cost of international report changed as the political or economy condition of the whole world. Even if the cost continue to increasing, it’s still unwise to decrease emphasis on international news. Because the world is changing almost every day, without a strength sustentation to the rapid changing, the efficiency and validity of the company will be much influenced. The final result must be that their consumers lose a lot.

In conclusion, the author's evidence lends little credible support to her claim. To reach this decision, the author must provide us more detailed information about the poorest-selling magazines and the competing magazines like the content or the sale number. Again, whatever, the evidence of increasing costs is unreasonable. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.

chill_lyUID: 2640200

The author of this argument claims that the newsmagazine should decrease and refrain from displaying international news on their magazine covers. To support this claim the author cites certain statistics about their poorest-selling were featured international news on their front cover and other evidences. Close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little credible support for the author's assertion.

The author bases her or his claim partly on the fact that their poorest-selling magazine issues over the past three years were those that featured international news stories on their front covers. It is just simply impose all the problems to the covers, because cover is only one feature of a magazine. (因为封面是杂志的唯一特征,这个意思?是想说被认定为唯一特征吧) It is equally possible that most readers care more about the content of the magazines, or the text of the reporter is so boring or the affairs are out of date that cannot meet the reader’s tastes.(分成两句吧,前后并列的不太好,前半句承上文补充因素,后半句开始说理由了) Besides, the author does not provide any number of the sales, or maybe it’s just a small decline that cannot reach this conclusion.

The argument also assumes unfairly that the competing news-magazines have significantly decreased the number of cover stories of international news. But(转折比较好) no evidence provided to show that these competing news-magazines’ sales or profits have increased. In addition, decreased international cover story did not represent they concern little about the international affairs; it’s likely that they designed some special topic or some detailed information in the magazines which will take much pages but only a short theme on the covers, so from the number of cover stories the arguer cannot assert the decrease of international stories. Since the arguer fails to rule out these and other possible explanations for it, I cannot convince the conclusion.

What’s more, the increasing cost of maintaining foreign bureaus to report on international news does not mean such kind of costs should be decreased in order to make profits. First, no evidence show that this increasing trends will lasting and the company cannot afford(afford及物动词) it, and it’s reasonable that the cost of international report changed as the political or economy condition of the whole world. Even if the cost continue to increase, it’s still unwise to decrease emphasis on international news. Because the world is changing almost every day, without a strength sustentation to the rapid changing, the efficiency and validity of the company will be much influenced. The final result must be that they lose a lot of consumers.

In conclusion, the author's evidence lends little credible support to her claim. To reach this decision, the author must provide us more detailed information about the poorest-selling magazines and the competing magazines like the content or the sale number. Again,( whatever别扭,去了吧), the evidence of increasing costs is unreasonable. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.

ARGUMENT问题不大,注意下细节就ok了

3# houpei0126