Issue 第3次作业【try best 】by wangyao735

wangyao735UID: 2629777

TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."

*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS:
TIME: 01:00:24
DATE: 2009-6-8 0:33:52




Critic defined as a person who evaluates works of art. Artist is a person who creates art.
Admittedly, something of lasting value is given by artist . However, without critic the art would not be understood efficiency, no matter give the society something of lasting value.

Admittedly, artist gives society something of lasting value, such as Mark Twain , Claude Monet, Elvis Aron Presley. Each of them contribute to the society so much. But that does not mean significance of critic could be neglected.




As we all know, when a art be created, there are few people pay attention on it. So we need some critic to read it, evaluate it. What's more recommend it to the reader. Then more and more people know the art and realize the value of the art. Especially now, there are various of arts fill with our society, how to select them is a question. So a critic was need to work as a filter, which help us determine
which art is worth our time and attention,
For example
a new novel might
be an inspired effort ,and if
without
a critic call our attention to it
I can not even think about how long it will be wait before people realize the value of this novel.

Undoubtedly, only the art could be better understood, the artist can gives society something of lasting value. If so the critic can help us understand and interpret art; a critic who is familiar with a particular artist and his or her works might haven certain insight about those works that the layperson would not. For example a paintings which be drew by
someone who come from another country which the culture, region, etc is different from us. How do I understand it without the critic’s help.


The critic not only help us understand the art but also provide feedback for artists; and constructive criticism, if taken to heart, can result in better work.


In sum, the artist is the value's creator and the critic is the value's seeker. More ever the critic promote the artist make the lasting value come true.

kuyuepoUID: 2468938

这次作业也太短了吧，--

wangyao735UID: 2629777

TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."

*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS: 415          TIME: 01:30:24          DATE: 2009-6-8 0:33:52

      Critic defined as a person who evaluates works of art. Artist is a person who creates art.  Admittedly, something of lasting value is given by artist . However, without critic the art would not be understood efficiency, no matter give the society something of lasting value.
       Admittedly, artist gives society something of lasting value, such as Mark Twain , Claude Monet, Elvis Aron Presley. Each of them contributes to the society so much. But it does not mean significance of critic could be neglected.   
       As we all know, when a art be created, there are few people pay attention on it. So we need some critic to read it, evaluate it. What's more recommend it to the reader. Then more and more people know the art and realize the value of the art. Especially now, there are various of arts fill with our society, how to select them is a question. No matter find someone of lasting vale.  If so a critic was need to work as a filter, which help us determine which art is worth our time and attention.  For example, a novel by a best seller author might be an uninspired effort ,and if  with a critic call our attention to it ,   we  could  spend our time and money on another navel instead of it.
          Undoubtedly, only the art be better understood, the artist can gives society something of lasting value. If so the critic can help us understand and interpret art; a critic who is familiar with a particular artist and his or her works might haven certain insight about those works that the layperson would not. For example a paintings which be drew by   someone who come from another country which the culture, region, etc is different from us. How do I understand it without the critic’s help .   
         The critic not only help us understand the art but also provide feedback for artists; and constructive criticism, if taken to heart, can result in better work.  The critic is the between artist and the people in the world. On the one hand they help people understand the art and the artist too.
On the other provide people’s reaction to the art and help the artist create something better than before. So how could I ignore the critic’s value.
        In sum, the artist is the value's creator and the critic is the value's seeker. More ever the critic promote the artist make the lasting value come true.

currycatUID: 2576917

这篇ISSUE的观点不错,是我没有想到的方面,呵呵~
我觉得结尾略显仓促,还有文章中可以将许多短句加些逻辑连词变成长句.会显得比较有节奏感,还有一些容易忽略的小地方要注意一下,论证过程还是比较紧密的,加油哦~
3-3.5
issue.doc (24.5 KB, 下载次数: 3)

2009-6-12 23:05:22 上传

下载次数: 3

currycatUID: 2576917

还有昨天有事,拖到今天才改,不好意思啊~