0910G【Try Best】第二小组 issue144 by vane5433

currycatUID: 2576917

Is it the artist, not the critic who gives society something of lasting value? This kind of statement seems to be some kind of subjective from my point of view. On the one hand, some artists do provide the society something of lasting value, however, the two occupations of artist and critic are not exclusively.

Lasting value refers to the value contributing to the society by a person or a group that has long-term affection on human beings. It is the treasure of the whole society which promotes the development of the world. Thus, it is a significant factor in the proceeding of human civilization.

By overlooking the history of human beings, it is not hard for us to find out that many artists really give the society something of lasting value. Artists often convent their opinions though their art works. Especially in some special times such as the Second World War during which period shown up a large amount of excellent art works. Some ideology showed by the artist is beyond people’s acceptable range at that time, however, the artist's opinion survived by the art works which can be seen by people nowadays can still has influence on the society. There are many examples to support my view, such as the peace dove painted by Pablo Picasso, a famous artist who wishes the peace of the whole world. He showed his opinion through that paint which still be respected by us. So is Mark Twain, the novels who left still have effect on our society nowadays.

On the other side, the conception of artist and critic can be mixture. That is to say the artist also can be critic and vice versus. Let us still take Mark Twain as a typical example by whom so many excellent critical novels were written such as running for governor and life on the Mississippi. The deep value of his novels shows the greatness of him. Many artists live in the lowest level of a society and even have to live on relief, so they will certainly have some critical opinions of the society they lived.

To sum up, artist and critic are two harmonized concepts, the saying which supports either meanwhile negative another is partial. Whether a person gives society something of lasting value depends on the content of the things or the contribution he do instead of the kind of his job. Meanwhile, ,the thing has lasting values is not merely art works, it also can be the victory of a war, a foot print on the moon or just a sentence and so forth.

第一次限时写的ISSUE,感觉很不好呃~

许浩杰UID: 2644623

1# currycat
Is it the artist, not the critic who gives society something of lasting value? This kind of statement seems to be some kind of subjective from my point of view. On the one hand, some artists do provide the society something of lasting value, however, the two occupations of artist and critic are not exclusively.
Lasting value refers to the value contributing to the society by a person or a group that has long-term affection on human beings. It is the treasure of the whole society which promotes the development of the world. Thus, it is a significant factor in the proceeding of human civilization.
By overlooking the history of human beings, it is not hard for us to find out that many artists really give the society something of lasting value. Artists often convent their opinions though their art works. Especially in some special times such as the Second World War during which period shown up a large amount of excellent art works（例子呢，感觉在纯说理，会让人不禁反问一句：凭什么这么说？）. Some ideology showed by the artist is beyond people’s acceptable range at that time, however, the artist's opinion survived by the art works which can be seen by people nowadays can still has influence on the society. There are many examples to support my view, such as the peace dove painted by Pablo Picasso, a famous artist who wishes the peace of the whole world. He showed his opinion through that paint which still be respected by us. So is Mark Twain, the novels who left still have effect on our society nowadays（两个例子扣的不错，符合你的long run affections，等等，affection只表达爱意哦，呵呵，affect就是名词可以表示影响了）.
On the other side, the conception of artist and critic can be mixture. That is to say the artist also can be critic and vice versus. Let us still take Mark Twain as a typical example by whom so many excellent critical novels were written such as running for governor and life on the Mississippi. The deep value of his novels shows the greatness of him. Many artists live in the lowest level of a society and even have to live on relief, so they will certainly have some critical opinions of the society they lived（你要说两个家可能交汇于同一个人身上？但是例子不好，说的不扣题，你看，have the critical opinions on the society they lived ,however, the status of the critic given by the issue is those who evaluates the films, novels, and paintings rather than who make comments on society or life.）.
To sum up, artist and critic are two harmonized concepts, the saying which supports either meanwhile negative another is partial. Whether a person gives society something of lasting value depends on the content of the things or the contribution he do instead of the kind of his job. Meanwhile, ,the thing has lasting values is not merely art works, it also can be the victory of a war, a foot print on the moon or just a sentence and so forth.

限时能写成这样很不错了，只有在文笔和逻辑上稍加锻炼就可以上战场了（顶礼膜拜ing）我现在现在要差不多150分钟挤出issue，路漫漫其修远兮，吾将上下而求索

currycatUID: 2576917

2# 许浩杰
谢谢哦~