- 最后登录
- 2024-4-24
- 在线时间
- 1465 小时
- 寄托币
- 7269
- 声望
- 645
- 注册时间
- 2009-4-6
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 237
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1356
- UID
- 2625832
  
- 声望
- 645
- 寄托币
- 7269
- 注册时间
- 2009-4-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 237
|
本帖最后由 missingusa 于 2009-6-27 19:45 编辑
修改:
144: It is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value.
第一段:定义lasting value,给出TS
第二段:举例
第三段:对其中一个例子展开
第四段:一句话过渡
第五段:岔开来举例浅谈critics的特点
第六段:critics特点总结+回到TS
第七段:联系实际
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since I definite “lasting value” as such kind of spirits as being brave, inflexible, optimistic, etc. that are undoubtedly able to make most people form a positive attitude towards various patterns of life full of thorns, I guarantee, throughout the entire human race and thus do good to establish a society of harmony, I completely agree with the speaker while I believe that it is exactly the artists themselves who give society something of lasting value..(第一段贴上去的时候句子本来就错了,尴尬...)
For example, one of the most famous writers, Helen Keller, started her life with the disability of seeing, listening and speaking; Claude Monet painted gorgeous “Water Lilies” while suffering from the sorrow of his second wife’s as well as his forty-seven-year-old son’s leaving in his eighties; J.S. Bach, losing his mother and thus became an orphan at the age of ten, finally achieved prominent success of music. These three artists’ formidable characteristics including bravery, stalwartness, persistence, may probably create righteous influence, at least, on me.
Let’s take a deep look at the case of Helen Keller. When she was 19 months old, a certain disease called scarlet fever resulted in her turning into deaf and blind and shortly thereafter she lost the ability to express language, what made the matter worse. However, this tenacious girl never gave up her life in the dark and lonely world. I still remember how I was surprised at a story told by my English teacher when I was in primary school that little Helen had ever spent three whole days just to learn how to write the word “water” and absolutely shocked by hearing the “news” that she even published a book named "Three Days to See". It was my first time that I had been so closed to this female writer filled with intelligence and bravery. Years have passed but such kind of feelings are still bringing me an impulse to keep striving hard against all odds on every aspect of my life.
Nevertheless, critics are not without a single redeeming feature.
As critics usually have a much narrower gap with the public and largely represent the common taste of a certain age in the long course of human race, the value created by them, which mainly refers to what they have discovered in artworks, is more inclined to be “far-reaching” instead of “lasting”. For instance, the opuses composed by Bach had not been paid much attention to by those critics while various genres of music mushroomed lively at the same time and yet retrained for a long period of time ironically until he passed away. It was likely that in this society more innovative things were demanded particularly by the critics as well as most people.
This fact, to some degree, may suggest that the value given by the critics is sort of being with the times or possibly influenced by time spirits. On the contrary, the spirit emitted by Bach's insisting on pursuing his perfect music probably appear to be lasting in this world and inspire people of different fields endlessly.
The global economic crisis now has confronted us again. I can see vividly that we are making great efforts just like Helen Keller, J.S. Bach do in their lifetime to recover from it as soon as we can and I believe, we are right here creating a certain value that is LASTING and will be definitely transmitted to our children, and our children’s children….
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I143: " 143.Artists should pay little attention to their critics. *Criticism tends to undermine and constrain the artist's creativity."
*those who evaluate works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thesis statement:
disagree. artists should listen to the critique and adopt some of the comments selectively.
that is to say, being absorbed in the words from those critics owning such charaters as objective, sincere, righteous, incisive, logical, etc.
Topic sentences:
1. it's the critics who select and show us which kind of art works should be respected and worth appreciating
2. make us understand art works more thoroughly, insightful and investicate such things beyond art itself
3. artists also need crtitics to force them to keep minds creative so as to create profound works or even awake them from being dried up and bourgeois
Conclusion:
citics play an important role binding the public and the artists together
they guide the public and stressing the artists thus they contribute to the existence of pure and true art. |
|