0910AW 同主题写作第六期 ISSUE157 by brisk1111

brisk1111UID: 2571604

TOPIC: ISSUE157 - "There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."



Whether the observation is subjective or not is depend on the purpose, the knowledge scope of people and the level of the technology regardless of observer's expectations or desires. In deed, objective observation does exist.
As we all known, the purpose of arts is to exhibit the author's own understanding of things. It is an expression of people's subjective reflection, of course, it inevitablely involves the subjective observation when they express themselves. On the contrary, the purpose of science is to find out the essential of matters. Only whey they observe things objectively can they achieve the goal, or they would lose the chance to find the truth. Take chemical experiment for example, before doing a experiment, the experimenter would design a synthesis route subjectively to expect to gain what he want. But after completing the experiment and gaining the product, he can not say the product is just what he want until though different detective apparatus to testify it. In this case, the observer's expectations or desires can do nothing. All results must be objective and consistent with the detective date because the purpose ask for it.

Although the scientists try their best to know the essential of the word, if the evidence is beyond people's knowledge scope, their observation can not say objective. To our distant ancestors the substance of world is comprised of gold, wood, water, fire and earth, they make this conclusion which partly objective during that time because of their limited knowledge, but in fact they add their subjective observation to try to find the source of substance. Then by way of scientific knowledge we learned that all matter is comprised of atoms, which are further comprised of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Then we discovered an even more basic unit of matter calls the quark. And now a new so-calls "string" theory posits the existence of an even more fundamental, and universal, unit of matter. That is to say, with the broad of people's scope and the development of technology, people can observe matter more objective.

In sum, the statement arbitrarily conclude that all observation is subjective, but in fact, as long as the purpose of people asking for observation, the knowledge scope is broad enough and the level of technology is sufficient to cope the problem, the observation can be objective.

brisk1111UID: 2571604

写完没时间改，飘飘受罪了

飘飘zlyUID: 2200552

TOPIC: ISSUE157 - "There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."



Whether the observation is subjective or not is depend on the purpose, the knowledge scope of people and the level of the technology regardless of observer's expectations or desires. In deed,（不应该有空格） objective observation does exist.

As we all known, the purpose of arts is to exhibit the author's own understanding of things. It is an expression of people's subjective reflection, of course, it inevitablely involves the subjective observation when they express themselves. On the contrary,(觉得前后有点脱节) the purpose of science is to find out the essential of matters. Only whey they observe things objectively can they achieve the goal, or they would lose the chance to find the truth. Take chemical experiment for example, before doing a experiment, the experimenter would design a synthesis route subjectively to expect to gain what he (or she) want. But after completing the experiment and gaining the product, he can not say the product is just what he want until though different detective apparatus to testify it. In this case, the observer's expectations or desires can do nothing. All results must be objective and consistent with the detective date because the purpose ask for it.
（这段最主要是问题是没有主题句，如果是第一句的话，我觉得它没有总领这段中心。）

Although the scientists try their best to know the essential of the word, if the evidence is beyond people's knowledge scope, their observation can not say objective.（前后人称不一致） To our distant ancestors the substance of world is comprised of gold, wood, water, fire and earth, they make this conclusion which partly objective during that time because of their limited knowledge, but in fact they add their subjective observation to try to find the source of substance. Then by way of scientific knowledge we learned that all matter is comprised of atoms, which are further comprised of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Then we discovered an even more basic unit of matter calls the quark. And now a new so-calls "string" theory posits the existence of an even more fundamental, and universal, unit of matter. That is to say, with the broad of people's scope and the development of technology, people can observe matter more objective.
（还是中心句问题，语法错误有点多哦。你我觉得你用的例子没有很好的说明观察更客观。）

In sum, the statement arbitrarily conclude that all observation is subjective, but in fact, as long as the purpose of people asking for observation, the knowledge scope is broad enough and the level of technology is sufficient to cope the problem, the observation can be objective.

现在在归定时间写成这样还是可以的。下次发贴之前，先看看有没有语法错误。

重点要注意中心句问题，论证不够充分，总觉得论证的有点含糊，逻辑也不够清楚。

小建议，下次还是写的你认为好了再改吧。(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……