issue69 WDI小组 by飘飘

飘飘zlyUID: 2200552

Issue 69
ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"

1.
政府应该支持对人类生活有益的科学研究，给科学研究自由。科学研究的成果可以提高生产力进步，提高人们生活水平，促进国家的发展。科学研究对未知探索找到合理的答案，也可以解决一些当今社会面对的问题。科学研究可以满足人类求知的欲望，更好的了解自身和我们生活的世界。
2.
科学研究在一方面满足了人类的需要的同时在另一反面有损害了人们利益（双刃剑）。当科学研究对人类造成伤害时，政府不应该对科学研究还减少限制。那样会导致严重的社会，伦理，道德问题，危害着人们的生活和社会的发展。克隆技术严重影响了我们的伦理道德标准。生化武器，核武器给人类带来的灾难时我们难以想象的。
3.
政府应该全面考虑科学研究对人类和社会的影响，在对科学的不确定性进行监控。在科学研究对社会收益和社会风险之间找到平衡。


Whether government should make constraints to scientific research? Some assert that government should set up a free environment of scientific research. However, the contention, in my opinion, is that the restrictions of scientific research depend on influences of itself in human lives and societies.

Government should back and make few limitations of scientific research which is beneficial for human beings and a society. In our contemporary lives, the outcomes of scientific research serve to improve the productivity of our country, and to enhance the quality of people's living standard. Taking exploring the moon as a example, it not only attempt to discover new land for human to live in future, but make many useful and valuable meanings in our daily lives, such as space breeding, observing the earth to protect nature disaster, and the like. With respect to these benefits of scientific research, Government, under this circumstance, should make freedoms for scientists and researchers to study as to meet the need of individuals and nations.

In addition, scientific research is an effective mean of which human make use to find out the reasoned answer to great numbers of the unknown and the proper method to solve lasting problems in the society. Also, our curiosities about the nature of things and our carving to understand ourselves and the world around us are satisfied with scientific research. In these cases of the positive requirements of scientific researches, government is incumbent to enable scientific research to continue smoothly.

On the other hand, government should monitor scientific research and development because scientific research does not always have merits for us in any time. The advantages of scientific research in one respect are the disadvantage in anther respect. Nothing in scientific research is best for all spects. For instance, biological engineering plays a significant role on medicine production and disease treatment, while the technology of clone now has challenges on human mores and ethic. If government could not restrict the use of clone, the disorder of world will have been long for us. When government is aware and conscious that scientific research might have negative function of human living and social development, they have obligations to constrict scientific research in order to diminish damage of our nature resource, human resource, and economy.

Before knowing the influence of scientific research, government has responsibilities to take scientific research into all-rounded consideration, for protecting the interests of people and societies. Government, as a deputy public interests and right, should prevent human and the world from dangerous factors of scientific research, avoiding tragedy happened in our society. Whether scientific research is taken effect for us or not largely depends on an attitude of our government. Facing with scientific research, government should weight returns and risks of scientific research in our society, not only place few or many restrictions.

In a short, government should set freedom of scientific research and development for advantage and merit brought by it, whereas impede its threat and danger. If it is not simple, government, what is more, should strike a balance between returns and risk of scientific research in society.

snail8843UID: 2516929

1# 飘飘zly

Whether government should make constraints to (constrian) scientific research? Some assert that government should set up a free environment of scientific research.(who??) However, the contention, in my opinion, is that the restrictions of scientific research depend on influences of itself in human lives and societies (society).
Government should back and
make few limitations of scientific research which is beneficial for human beings and a society. In our contemporary lives, the outcomes of scientific research serve to improve the productivity of our country, and to enhance the quality of people's living standard. Taking exploring the moon as a(an) example, it not only attempt to discover new land for human to live in (the)future, but (also) make many useful and valuable meanings in our daily lives, such as space breeding, observing the earth to protect nature disaster, and the like. With respect to these benefits of scientific research, Government, under this circumstance, should make freedoms for (?有这说法呢？)scientists and researchers to study as to meet the need of individuals and nations.
In addition, scientific research is an effective mean of which human make use to find out the reasoned answer to great numbers of the unknown （ unsolved mysteries） and （find out）the proper method to solve lasting problems in the society（和unknown 有些重复）. Also, our curiosities about the nature of things and our carving to understand ourselves and the world around us are satisfied with scientific research. In these cases of the positive requirements of scientific researches, government is incumbent to enable scientific research to continue smoothly. （这段论述下来你是支持政府限制呢还是不支持？？一直在谈科学研究的作用，而且缺乏例证。）


On the other hand, government should monitor scientific research and development because scientific research does not always have merits for us in any time. The advantages of scientific research in one respect are the disadvantage in anther（another） respect. Nothing in scientific research is best for all spects（aspects）. For instance, biological engineering plays a significant role on medicine production and disease treatment, while the technology of clone now has challenges on human mores and ethic. If government could not restrict the use of clone, the disorder of world will have been （将来完成时？） long for us. When government is aware and conscious that scientific research might have negative function of human living and social development, they have obligations to constrict scientific research in order to diminish damage of our nature resource, human resource, and economy.
（这几个方面例证没涉及到奥…）

Before knowing the influence of scientific research, government has responsibilities to take scientific research into all-rounded consideration, for protecting the interests of people and societies. Government, as a deputy public interests and right, should prevent human and the world from dangerous factors of scientific research, avoiding tragedy happened in our society. Whether scientific research is taken effect for us or not largely depends on an attitude of our government. (要论证啊)Facing with scientific research, government should weight returns and risks of scientific research in our society, not only place few or many restrictions.（缺乏例证…）
In a short, government should set freedom of scientific research and development for advantage and merit brought by it, whereas impede its threat and danger. If it is not simple, government, what is more, should strike a balance between returns and risk of scientific research in society.
总结：颠来倒去就是说对有害的要限制，有益的不要限制。用二段就能说完了，而本文却用了四段。同时缺乏例证。还有语言有点弱…