- 最后登录
- 2010-6-27
- 在线时间
- 492 小时
- 寄托币
- 2215
- 声望
- 166
- 注册时间
- 2008-4-12
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 19
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1882
- UID
- 2482591
 
- 声望
- 166
- 寄托币
- 2215
- 注册时间
- 2008-4-12
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 19
|
words:511
Should governments pay more attention to solving the immediate problems in nowadays rather than the anticipated ones in the future? To the author, the answer is absolutely yes. However, I agree insofar as that the governments do should concentrate on problems in the current society, while it is also worth considering whether the present-day action is benefit for developing constantly in the future.
To begin with, admittedly, I have to concede undoubtedly that we should do effort to solve the immediate problems in order to build a fundamental step as a premise for advancing in future. To witness solving problems to prepare for future, one need look no further than the learning procedure of our babies, that unless they had learned to walk they would not know how to run, and that they could not speak with a complete sentence until they had learned some single words. Furthermore, according to the Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, the higher needs in this hierarchy only come into focus when the lower needs in the pyramid are met. That is to say, people would not focus on the chase for spiritual demand when the physical need has not been satisfied, so would governments.
However, it may lead to serious consequences if officials in governments take more attention to the problems currently and despise what would happen later. Here are two facts to confirm it. A horrible disease of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was generated and spread in Guangdong province of China in 2003. For their political careers, which are the ironically vital immediate problem to them, some governors choose to withhold the disease information from citizens. Afterwards, the situation was getting worse and worse. Due to the population flow and virus infections, thousands of persons got the disease in many other cities, including Beijing and Shanghai. Finally, it cost the nation a large number of resources to overcome the national epidemic disease. In the scope of worldwide, when talking about the responsibility of the recent global financial crisis, some people believe that if the American government foresees the depressing tendency in economy and do something to prevent increasing damage from the circumstance in the future.
Moreover, certain crisis have to be solved immediately in nowadays exactly due to governments were blind to the problems that may occur in the future. For instance, governments should pay attention to certain environment experts’ suggestion to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases in several decades ago for preventing the world from the increasingly serious global warming. Similarly, the problem of the larger ozone hole above the two polar regions is also could be avoidable which relieves more harmful ultraviolet radiation onto the earth, if the governments had concentrated on considering the future.
In sum, the governments do should solve the immediate problems which are the premise to have achievements in the future, while the anticipated problems also should be focused. In my observation, furthermore, the government as a role of leader must seek the balance between immediate problems and anticipated ones for the sustainable development of human beings. |
|