Issue121（球拍，有拍有回）

kevin0912UID: 2525323

无限时的第一篇，字数写得有些多，大家主要给看看思路吧~
121."At various times in the geological past, many species have become extinct as a result of natural, rather than human, processes. Thus, there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species."


I agree with the speaker’s board assertion that since as a result of natural processes, lots of species have become extinct, without human at many times in the geological past, it is not fair to make expanse to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being, to save endangered species. However, sometimes we still have some responsibilities of helping those species dying out because in the development of industrialization some pollution and environmental disasters are made by human being.

To began with and basically, we can see the statements make sense that in old times those species would die out for failure to adapt to other changing conditions rather than human processes for the reason that there was no human being existing in the world at that time. As soon as the living condition changes, such as weather becoming too hot or too cold, habitats diminishing, hardly finding their food, species would all probably extinct, no matter how strong and powerful they used to be. Here’s a good example that can illustrate my point. During the late Jurassic Period and possibly the Early Cretaceous Period, lived a genus of sauropod dinosaur. Brachiosaurus, meaning “arm lizard” was one of the largest animals known to have walked the earth. Even though they were huge and powerful, they suddenly became extinct approximately 65 million years ago, with many other groups of dinosaurs. The nature of the events that caused this mass extinction has been extensively studied and accepted, such as the asteroid collision. It is said that the impact caused extinctions both directly (by the heat from the meteorite impact) and also indirectly (via a worldwide cooling brought about when matter ejected from the impact crater reflected thermal radiation from the sun). Also some paleontologists believe that failure to survive in changing conditions is the truth of extinction of dinosaurs. Whatever is really truth, those species died out about 65 million years ago; by that time none of human being existed on this planet. Yet, they still disappeared from the Earth without any of us. As a matter of fact, the dinosaur is just one of the millions of the extinct species during the past millions of years. Accordingly, some species would not survive in this changing world because of poor adaptation or natural selection as a result they would die out, that is what we could not help.

Furthermore, from a practical point of view, inadequate resources call for restrictions, priorities, and choices. Even though human were so merciful that we could not bear to ignore other species dying out, our society can not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost. The need of human being and our society, of course, must be put on the first consideration. What is more, the needs are increasing day by day. Overpopulation has become a serious environmental problem, even worse bringing a series of problems like insufficient resources including fresh water, clean air, food, land, energy, and other resources necessary to sustain life. What is more, the society has to take care of lots of society problems which also cost our great efforts and financial well-being. We are not the Lord of nature and we can not do everything. Facing those problems of nature and society, we have to make choice and selectively overcome them one by one. In short, the government and society have to make choices sometimes to make sure at least people need should be met at first and then other things can be considered later.

It is true that some extinction of species is entirely irrelevant for our human being or we could barely do anything to help them out of trouble, however, in some other situations, that animals and plants dying out because of human processes and development of society is a truly fact. With the progress of human civilization and growing population, forests especially rain forests millions of species rely on as their habitats are being quickly destroyed. As we all know, habitats are so particular for animal and plant species to inhabit. What means that, losing their habitat would become a disaster for those species, without proper environments and food. Despite the opposition to the cutting down of rain forests, the problem continues. In addition to the Amazon’s rain forests, many other forests are being cut down as well. The world’ growing population has been a primary cause of the rain forest destruction. More people need land to live on and wood products to consume. What is more, industrial developments take so much resource which other species rely on from natural, meanwhile bring tons of pollutions and dregs into environment causing several environmental problems such as acid rain, air pollutions, water pollutions, global warming, smog etc. All of those problems can destroy thousands of species’ living pattern and land they inhabit, which is out of any adoption or natural selection. Indeed, all these serious issues as a result of human processes would of course damage the living condition of other species in the world.

Simply put, some species would still extinct no matter human processes. However, our society have to save the endangered species because a fire amount of inappropriate human processes or lots of species are such treasure to us, that we have the responsibility for making sure that those species not exist in our offspring’s textbooks.

nohevenUID: 2447539

无限时的第一篇，字数写得有些多，大家主要给看看思路吧~
121."Atvarious times in the geological past, many species have become extinctas a result of natural, rather than human, processes. Thus, there is nojustification for society to make extraordinary efforts, especially ata great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species."


  I agree with thespeaker’s board assertion that since as a result of natural processes,lots of species have become extinct, without human at many times in thegeological past, it is not fair to make expanse to humans in effort,time, and financial well-being, to save endangered species. （这个句子其实就是对题目的改写，但个人觉得句式显得有些累赘。）However,sometimes we still have some responsibilities of helping those speciesdying out because in the development of industrialization somepollution and environmental disasters are made by human being.

To began with andbasically, we can see the statements make sense that in old times thosespecies would die out for failure to adapt to other changing conditionsrather than human processes for the reason that there was no humanbeing existing in the world at that time. As soon as the livingcondition changes, such as weather becoming too hot or too cold,habitats diminishing, hardly finding their food, species would allprobably extinct, no matter how strong and powerful they used to be.Here’s a good example that can illustrate my point. During the lateJurassic Period and possibly the Early Cretaceous Period, lived a genusof sauropod dinosaur. Brachiosaurus, meaning “arm lizard” was one ofthe largest animals known to have walked the earth. Even though theywere huge and powerful, they suddenly became extinct approximately 65million years ago, with many other groups of dinosaurs. The nature ofthe events that caused this mass extinction has been extensivelystudied and accepted, such as the asteroid collision. It is said thatthe impact caused extinctions both directly (by the heat from themeteorite impact) and also indirectly (via a worldwide cooling broughtabout when matter ejected from the impact crater reflected thermalradiation from the sun). Also some paleontologists believe that failureto survive in changing conditions is the truth of extinction ofdinosaurs. Whatever is really truth, those species died out about 65million years ago; by that time none of human being existed on thisplanet. Yet, they still disappeared from the Earth without any of us.As a matter of fact, the dinosaur is just one of the millions of theextinct species during the past millions of years. Accordingly, somespecies would not survive in this changing world because of pooradaptation or natural selection as a result they would die out, that iswhat we could not help.(1.建议段首写上论点总述句，这样比较符合英文写作的习惯；2.Brachiosaurus的例子处理的有些冗长，其实没必要在众说纷纭方面花费太多笔墨，集中写能够证明作者论点的部分就可以了)

Furthermore, from apractical point of view, inadequate resources call for restrictions,priorities, and choices. Even though human were so merciful that wecould not bear to ignore other species dying out, our society can notmake extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost. The need ofhuman being and our society, of course, must be put on the firstconsideration. What is more, the needs are increasing day by day.Overpopulation has become a serious environmental problem, even worsebringing a series of problems like insufficient resources includingfresh water, clean air, food, land, energy, and other resourcesnecessary to sustain life. What is more, the society has to take careof lots of society problems which also cost our great efforts andfinancial well-being. We are not the Lord of nature and we can not doeverything. Facing those problems of nature and society, we have tomake choice and selectively overcome them one by one. In short, thegovernment and society have to make choices sometimes to make sure atleast people need should be met at first and then other things can beconsidered later. （觉得这段写的有些累赘。一些句子其实是同义重复，如果作者想论述得丰富一些，可以适当增加一些生活中的小例子）

It is true thatsome extinction of species is entirely irrelevant for our human beingor we could barely do anything to help them out of trouble, however, insome other situations, that animals and plants dying out because ofhuman processes and development of society is a truly fact. With theprogress of human civilization and growing population, forestsespecially rain forests millions of species rely on as their habitatsare being quickly destroyed. As we all know, habitats are so particularfor animal and plant species to inhabit. What means that, losing theirhabitat would become a disaster for those species, without properenvironments and food. Despite the opposition to the cutting down ofrain forests, the problem continues. In addition to the Amazon’s rainforests, many other forests are being cut down as well. The world’growing population has been a primary cause of the rain forestdestruction. More people need land to live on and wood products toconsume. What is more, industrial developments take so much resourcewhich other species rely on from natural, meanwhile bring tons ofpollutions and dregs into environment causing several environmentalproblems such as acid rain, air pollutions, water pollutions, globalwarming, smog etc. All of those problems can destroy thousands ofspecies’ living pattern and land they inhabit, which is out of anyadoption or natural selection. Indeed, all these serious issues as aresult of human processes would of course damage the living conditionof other species in the world.

Simply put, somespecies would still extinct no matter human processes. However, oursociety have to save the endangered species because a fire amount ofinappropriate human processes or lots of species are such treasure tous, that we have the responsibility for making sure that those speciesnot exist in our offspring’s textbooks.

怎么说呢，觉得作者论述的“没错”，但是文章的面目有些模糊和泛泛而谈。这道题，我个人觉得切入容易，深入难。平衡论点是很容易想到的，关键是如何深入论述。我暂时想到的是对保护濒危物种的前提和代价等，增设条件，进行切入；其次是可以对保护濒危物种的社会与自然方面的长远影响增加论述。

DidasWUID: 2666962

I agree with the speaker’s board assertion that since as a result of natural processes, lots of species have become extinct（have extincted好像就可以了吧, without human at many times in the geological past, it is not fair to make expanse（expense？） to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being, to save endangered species. However, sometimes we still have some responsibilities of helping those species dying out because in the development of industrialization some pollution and environmental disasters are made by human being.


To began with and basically, we can see the statements make sense that in old times those species would die out for failure to adapt to other changing conditions rather than human processes for the reason that there was no human being existing in the world at that time. As soon as the living condition changes, such as weather becoming too hot or too cold, habitats diminishing, hardly finding their food, species would all probably extinct, no matter how strong and powerful they used to be. Here’s a good example that can illustrate my point. During the late Jurassic Period and possibly the Early Cretaceous Period, lived a genus of sauropod dinosaur. Brachiosaurus, meaning “arm lizard” was one of the largest animals known to have walked the earth. Even though they were huge and powerful, they suddenly became extinct approximately 65 million years ago, with many other groups of dinosaurs. The nature of the events that caused this mass extinction has been extensively studied and accepted, such as the asteroid collision. It is said that the impact caused extinctions both directly (by the heat from the meteorite impact) and also indirectly (via a worldwide cooling brought about when matter ejected from the impact crater reflected thermal radiation from the sun). Also some paleontologists believe that failure to survive in changing conditions is the truth of extinction of dinosaurs. Whatever is really truth, those species died out about 65 million years ago; by that time none of human being existed on this planet. Yet, they still disappeared from the Earth without any of us. As a matter of fact, the dinosaur is just one of the millions of the extinct species during the past millions of years. Accordingly, some species would not survive in this changing world because of poor adaptation or natural selection as a result they would die out, that is what we could not help.
这段我总觉得有点长，并且好像是在有意凑字数的感觉，毕竟恐龙灭绝这种事情，作为一个例子，应该可以用更简单的花说清楚的……稍微写多点也可以，但是不知道一段317个字吧，好像太重了点。觉得可以不仅仅说恐龙，地球上有五次大规模的生物灭绝，冰河期也可以写一写嘛，剑齿虎猛犸象也都是很熟悉的形象，我觉得要丰富一点比较好，而且各个例子也可以给人感觉简练一点
（后面的文章也看了，没贴了而已）
后面作者的观点，我感觉是自然保护也要分清主次，现在花大价钱进行保护，从很大程度上剥削了很多人的生存权力。由于人口膨胀是一个客观的前提，我们虽然想环保，但是应该将环保放在让人活下去之后，更何况我们的能力也没强到能保护的程度。

我觉得可以换个思路，1有很多东西不是因为人灭绝的，恐龙猛犸象之类
                    2人类现在也没有能力去保护有些动物
                    3人类现在的情况是自保亦难（前三点，可以稍微写略写点，23也可以并在一起）
                    4但是，需要逐渐提高自己环保的意识，不能因为难保护就不去保护。而且针对一些因为人而灭绝以及将要灭绝的东西，人应该有着责任感，不应该以能力不足为理由去放任这种情况，这只能让情况恶化并且反过来也不利于自己的长远利益。而且很多事情我们是因为自己的“享受欲”而剥夺了动物的“生存权”，并不是因为权衡了自己的生存权和动物的生存权而选择了前者。

DidasWUID: 2666962

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... 6amp%3Btypeid%3D101

如果可以的，麻烦帮忙也改一下，也是第一篇