triter eight

emily_feifeiUID：2626151

12# wk4a

TOPIC: ISSUE40 - "Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."

WORDS: 480  会不会太少啊        TIME: 02:00:00          DATE: 2009-8-8 13:42:33

1.大部分学者的研究资金来自社会和国家，不关心创造社会价值是不负责任的。（这点我没想过诶）
2.当然，科学研究最重要的动力是兴趣，要把兴趣和创造价值结合起来。这样有利于科研。
3.很多时候人们并不知道自己的研究会有什么社会价值，比如电脑，所以可以按照兴趣来走，但是这不是说忽视为社会服务这样的思考前提。

Both practical applications and personal interests are significant reasons for scholars and researchers to conduct their experiments and researches for the profound contributions they offer to the society and endless pleasure to themselves. There is no necessity to discuss which of the two elements is more vital, but great benefit about how to combine them.

Generally, most scholars and researchers receive their funds from public organizations and government, namely all the tax payers. It would be irresponsible for them to exclude the society needs while financially supported by it. A society, for example, with serious unemployment, has to take care of issues of people who are out job. What would it be at such an urgent time if all the socialists and economists ignore the emergency while research problems like urban design or city greening programs according to their own interests? The society would inevitably encounter more problems as some jobless people find illegal means to make a living. Since tax payers have paid scientists to help maintain the balance of the society, they have rights to require a contribution received from scholars and researchers.（逻辑点不错，就是例子的力度感觉弱了点。）你介绍个具体的国家给我吧，我这方面基本上想不出来 看你这个观点时就觉得不容易写，我没想到合适的。

Without doubt, the best motive force is one's interest when doing difficult and arduous scientific researches.（后面呢？才说了一个best force就来even better了~任何支撑论据。） 这句话通吗？我是想写个递进。通倒是通，我也赞同，不过就是觉得少了支撑，你字数也不太够用啊，还不多写点。And it is even better to effectively combining one's interest and social needs in order to fulfill personal achievement and lead financial support to a virtuous circle. Social demands and researchers' own interest are never contraries.（谓语不好用are吧，用should是不是好点。用are表示既成事实啊。） 这个倒是are好点吧，看着像定理公式一样。问题是这不是定理。很多时候兴趣和社会需要反而是相悖的。For example, the great Wright brothers, who created the first plane in the world, were simply trying to realize their dream aroused from childhood. The brilliant brothers also anticipated the possible impact on the whole transportation system afterwards. After that, they founded the Wright plane company which worth millions of dollar. Without ambition and interest, Wright brothers could never create the first plane; without the contribution they made for society, it is not possible to develop their dream to a giant company.

Actually,（每段的开头跟我风格很像的~）你的和我的也很像。 people may have no clue about whether a new discovery or invention has a social significance at the first moment. The best way, in most circumstances, is to follow one's own interest. But this never indicates that any scientific research can ignore social demands. Instead, the requirement from society should be always kept in scientists' minds. Many interesting inventions are only results as people try to entertain themselves or satisfy curiosity, but out of expectation, to have changed the world. People in ancient time had no idea about what is like on the side of the ocean, nor did not know what may be found on the moon decades ago, but we just want to explore and firmly believe such research would make some contributions.（光believe有啥用啊~用事实说话——焦点访谈）我找了半个小时例子…………………………

It is the curiosity and interest that drive people work hard to find one and another truth, and the followed contributions are results delicately concern about social issues. Together, they offer us a better world.


给点例子吧……主体最后一段和我的想法有点类似，我用的例子是青霉素和X-ray都是偶然发现，但都起了大作用。
对了，你那个朝鲜的视频叫什么来着？ 《直击朝鲜》共5集

emily_feifeiUID：2626151

13# lele77521

40"Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."
我们不应该仅仅关注学者和研究者的著作能否对社会做出贡献。更重要的是关注他们如何追求实现自己的兴趣，无论那些兴趣显得是多么的非同寻常。(少数和多数之科学家)

I partially agree with the author's assertion that it is justifiable to pursuing one's interest, however unusual or idiosyncratic it may seem. They should not be concerned with whether their outcomes make contribution to the whole society.（你就又抄了下题目，考官应该会很反感吧） In my opinion, it is human nature to pursue what they love. However, one should also consider the social value from some other angles, such as economy or philosophy.

Each of us has our own interests and dreams, which is the driving force in our life. History never lacks examples of talents（Chinglish？） who pursue their personal interest. Take the Wright brothers as an example（你和组长的例子一样一样的啊）, they dreamed of that one day they can fly in the sky like birds, which seemed like a crazy idea at that time. But it is their “unrealistic” dream which made the world smaller, and brought people closer together. Perhaps they had never thought they have the duty to devote themselves to their society, but they invented the airplane for（删掉） in order to finish their dream.（这个例子论证得挺不错） Similar examples can be seen in many fields, one of the most famous economists, Keynes who was major in mathematics, but he was interested in economics and creates his famous classical work we briefly called ‘General Theory’, which still play an indispensible role in solving the latest economic crisis. To some extent, individuals who work for their interest or dream may create outstanding accomplishment, because they will spare no efforts to realize their solitary goal. Although they may not consider what benefits they can bring to the other people or then whole society, they make contribution to humankinds in their own practical way.（这段论证到点子上了）

Under some circumstance, however, individuals should consider their social value in the process of realizing their unusual interests. From the economic angle, it is apparently in modern field of scientific research for the reason that many problems were not simply than ever before. In the past, one may tackle a problem by oneself with little economic cost. But it is totally a different case in nowadays. Most of professors need fund from private company or government to finish their research, under this circumstance;（分号不是乱点的，这显然该把分号点在under前，逗号在circumstance后） no one wants to invest money on researches with little social value.（停住，你上面说要考虑社会价值，后面又转到道德观去了。另外，你文章中说的社会价值应该是效用方面的，但是我理解的social value应该是观念方面的。） From the moral level, although those scholars who are interested in the Nuclear Weapon will satisfy their curiosity about high technology, people who love peace will not consider they make contribution to humankinds.   
（建议你分两段，一段说不能创造价值的研究没有意义，另一段说研究违背道德是不对滴。字数还多了~）
In sum, scholars should go on to pursue their interest like ever before. On the one hand, they should consider its social value whether in long-term or in short-term. Otherwise, they can hardly finish their research which needs relative high cost. On the other hand, they should obey the basic moral standard and realize their dream.

lele77521UID：2672123

212"If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."
如果一个目标是值得的，那么追求目标的任何手段都是正当的。

TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."
WORDS: 355          TIME: 00:45:00          DATE: 2009-8-8 20:40:12

It is hard to say whether a goal is worthy or not without considering any restrictions or the interest it represents, let alone the means to attain it is justifiable or not. Therefore, in my opinion, before we evaluate the efficiency of the means, we should at first have a clear notion about the goal we set

Whether a goal is worthy or not depends largely on whose interests it represents. And what's the standard of a worthy goal? Here I would like to state my viewpoint based on two aspects—social value and private value. Take the famous economist—Keynes as an example, whose goal in 1929 was to build a new theory about macroeconomics and he eventually found an effective way to overcome the economic crisis in 20th century. Apparently, his goal is worthy for the reason that he realize his own personal value and also promote the development of society. Another instance is the literary works. One of my favorite novels is ‘The Kite runner’; the author’s finished his valuable goal because the public are benefited from his masterpiece. Whether from personal’s angle or social angle they are all worthwhile .And another example is the Swine flu, which usually happens among pigs, has deprived of lives recently. It is really worthwhile to overcome this problem through the cooperation of all countries.

However, there some people who pursue their goal without considering the other’s interests or the social cost. With the rapid development of modern industry, thousands of factories are founded. The manager’s goal is maximum their profits, but at the same time, those factories polluted the environment seriously and damage the local residents’ healthy. Under this circumstance, if the manager does not care for their social cost, their goal is not a worthy one from the public’s angle. But it is worthwhile in the eye’s of the manager. So, from this simple example we can see that whether a goal is worthy or not relies on whose interests it represents. Meantime, some goals are unworthy from the humankinds' moral angle. Such as the human cloning research, which apparently disobey human beings' basic moral standard that each of is unique. Generally speaking, the goal that will promote social development, or enhance the living standard of citizens is worthwhile.

Even assuming that we have set a worthy goal, the way we attain it relies on two aspects. In the first place, we should consider the basic economic cost. If a beneficial goal costs two much which beyond our budget, of course, we should give up or consider it later. Saving wild animals, for instance, is a worthy goal that can help maintain the balance in nature. So money spent on protecting the endanger creature is money well invested, but it does not mean that we must to save every endanger animals. On the one hand, it is natural selection and we should not against the laws; on the other hand, given the limited revenue, we human beings still have lots of immediate problems to solve, we can hardly spent enough money on saving the animals, we must allocate fund on it in a reasonable way. In the second place, we should consider the moral factors. it is unmoral to realize one's goal through damaging the other's interest. Which can illustrate by the example of the factories above mentioned.

In sum, before we set a goal, we should ensure the goal is worthy which would not hurt the others; then we had better find a proper way which has the minimum opportunity cost both in economy and in human moral.

wk4aUID：2616910

TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."

Admirable is the firm determination to achieve one's goal regardless the difficult and arduous process, but it is never wise to unnecessarily embrace every potentially detrimental means, taking persons involved or the whole society into consideration in the long run.

As for individuals, though the anticipated destiny is appealing, ignoring detrimental aspects can result in both a less favorable result and other unexpected outcomes. Generally, people tend to find excuse to purge them of a charge when the goal seems to be just. It is not uncommon to find a man who does not exist to show shadowy fight against the dangerous world to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless and the powerless. Thus encouragement in movies raise a false conclusion among people especially teenagers: to bring a clean society is to kill all the wicked. However, Aristotle marked two thousand years ago, "the rule of law is better than the rule of any individuals." It is dangerous to put the whole law system aside and take actions totally based on people's own judgment. Some black sheep in society may be kicked out, but the whole regulations and orders are messed up, leaving the whole society paralyzed.

More seriously, for countries, narrowly focusing on a goal and ignoring other aspects can cause a big lost rather than achievement. Untold inter-country wars have proved this tragedy long numerous times. The Second World War, for example, which is caused by selfish desire of a few countries, put the whole world in hell. For those countries that started the two wars, agreeable are the victories that can bring much sources and lands, and significantly beneficial to their own development. However, for the rest that lost their homelands, thousands of people can be homeless and homeless let alone the environment could be seriously damaged. If the goal is paid by the sacrifice of majority, it is not justifiable.

Actually, every unscrupulous mean which has been put into practice is a result of both shortsighted and egoism. Some individuals or organizations that put their goals beyond everything may achieve some benefits, but such benefits are at the expense of other relatively enormous sacrifice. It is absurd to close all the factories in order to eliminate environment pollution; it is ridiculous to recall all the cars in expecting to reduce traffic accidents; it also too foolish to kill all the patients when try to control a fatal virus. One the contrary, if during the pursuit process for a goal, people carefully evaluate all the possible means and choose a multiple-win one, a virtuous circle can be enjoyed as well.

Justifiable or not, the judgment of means should never narrowly based on people who take them, but on every possible influenced aspects, people, organizations and environment. The thriving of society, as a whole, is the final goal we need to pursuit.

wk4aUID：2616910

TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."
WORDS: 355          TIME: 00:45:00          DATE: 2009-8-8 20:40:12

It is hard to say whether a goal is worthy or not without considering any restrictions or the interest it represents, let alone the means to attain it is justifiable or not. Therefore, in my opinion, before we evaluate the efficiency of the means, we should at first have a clear notion about the goal we set
再加上对手段的判断，不然题目分析不全面。

Whether a goal is worthy or not depends largely on whose interests it represents. And what's the standard of a worthy goal?（第一句是观点，第二句就反驳，似乎不太好） Here I would like to state my viewpoint based on two aspects—social value and private value. Take the famous economist—Keynes as an example, whose goal in 1929 was to build a new theory about macroeconomics and he eventually found an effective way to overcome the economic crisis in 20th century. Apparently, his goal is worthy for the reason that he realize his own personal value and also promote the development of society. Another instance is the literary works. One of my favorite novels is ‘The Kite runner’; the author’s finished his valuable goal because the public are benefited from his masterpiece. Whether from personal’s angle or social angle they are all worthwhile .And another example is the Swine flu, which usually happens among pigs, has deprived of lives recently. It is really worthwhile to overcome this problem through the cooperation of all countries.
最后这个swine flu的例子不知道你想表达的是什么？前面两个还不错。

However, there some people who pursue their goal without considering the other’s interests or the social cost. With the rapid development of modern industry, thousands of factories are founded. The manager’s goal is maximum their profits, but at the same time, those factories polluted the environment seriously and damage the local residents’ healthy. Under this circumstance, if the manager does not care for their social cost, their goal is not a worthy one from the public’s angle. But it is worthwhile in the eye’s of the manager. So, from this simple example we can see that whether a goal is worthy or not relies on whose interests it represents. Meantime, some goals are unworthy from the humankinds' moral angle. Such as the human cloning research, which apparently disobey human beings' basic moral standard that each of is unique. Generally speaking, the goal that will promote social development, or enhance the living standard of citizens is worthwhile.
我觉得你这里其实是在谈手段的好坏了，比如工场为了效益，不惜牺牲环境，手段不好，目标没问题啊

Even assuming that we have set a worthy goal, the way we attain it relies on two aspects. In the first place, we should consider the basic economic cost. If a beneficial goal costs two much which beyond our budget, of course, we should give up or consider it later. Saving wild animals, for instance, is a worthy goal that can help maintain the balance in nature. So money spent on protecting the endanger creature is money well invested, but it does not mean that we must to save every endanger animals. On the one hand, it is natural selection and we should not against the laws; on the other hand, given the limited revenue, we human beings still have lots of immediate problems to solve, we can hardly spent enough money on saving the animals, we must allocate fund on it in a reasonable way. In the second place, we should consider the moral factors. it is unmoral to realize one's goal through damaging the other's interest. Which can illustrate by the example of the factories above mentioned.
这一段论述的不错，例子和说理都有，继续这样练习吧。

In sum, before we set a goal, we should ensure the goal is worthy which would not hurt the others; then we had better find a proper way which has the minimum opportunity cost both in economy and in human moral.
个人认为还是侧重说手段的好坏比较好点，题目虽然和目标的正确与否有关系，但是相对较小。

emily_feifeiUID：2626151

19# wk4a

TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."

Admirable is the firm determination to achieve one's goal regardless the difficult and arduous process, but it is never wise to unnecessarily embrace every potentially detrimental means, taking persons involved or the whole society into consideration in the long run. （简洁明白！）

As for individuals, though the anticipated destiny is appealing, ignoring detrimental aspects can result in both a less favorable result and other unexpected outcomes.（文采好，观点也明了） Generally, people tend to find excuse to purge them of a charge when the goal seems to be just. It is not uncommon to find a man who does not exist to show shadowy fight（什么意思） against the dangerous world to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless and the powerless. Thus encouragement in movies raise a false conclusion among people especially teenagers: to bring a clean society is to kill all the wicked. However, Aristotle marked two thousand years ago, "the rule of law is better than the rule of any individuals." It is dangerous to put the whole law system aside and take actions totally based on people's own judgment. Some black sheep in society may be kicked out, but the whole regulations and orders are messed up, leaving the whole society paralyzed. （恕我没明白你这段后面在分析什么啊）

More seriously, for countries, narrowly focusing on a goal and ignoring other aspects(和上段紫色部分对照下，觉得你两段在讲类似的事情) can cause a big lost rather than achievement. Untold inter-country wars have proved this tragedy long numerous times. The Second World War, for example, which is caused by selfish desire of a few countries, put the whole world in hell. For those countries that started the two wars, agreeable are the victories that can bring much sources and lands, and significantly beneficial to their own development. However, for the rest that lost their homelands, thousands of people can be homeless and homeless let alone（终于对了！你喜欢用let alone 我喜欢用not to mention） the environment could be seriously damaged. If the goal is paid by the sacrifice of majority, it is not justifiable.

Actually, every unscrupulous mean which has been put into practice is a result of both shortsighted and egoism. Some individuals or organizations that put their goals beyond everything may achieve some benefits, but such benefits are at the expense of other relatively enormous sacrifice（see，和上面那段又是很类似）. It is absurd to close all the factories in order to eliminate environment pollution; it is ridiculous to recall all the cars in expecting to reduce traffic accidents; it also too foolish to kill all the patients when try to control a fatal virus. One the contrary, if during the pursuit process for a goal, people carefully evaluate all the possible means and choose a multiple-win one, a virtuous circle can be enjoyed as well.

Justifiable or not, the judgment of means should never narrowly based on people who take them, but on every possible influenced aspects, people, organizations and environment. The thriving of society, as a whole, is the final goal we need to pursuit.

（不知道是不是脑子有点转不动了，我觉得你这三段的内容不够清晰，似乎都有相似的陈述，建议写下提纲）

lele77521UID：2672123

2# emily_feifei
我现在看你的文章是学习了，呵呵，这篇写的挺好，结构思路我感觉在我的水平上找不出什么问题。语言问题让组长找吧，我水平还不行。你应该也感觉这篇文章挺好，例子什么我都在之前的文章里看过了。

wk4aUID：2616910

居然开始没看到这一篇 TOPIC: ISSUE40 - "Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem." WORDS: 533          TIME: 00:52:36+10min(棕色部分)          DATE: 2009-8-8 11:11:27 Retrospect to human history, dazzling innovations and discoveries have added fuel to our society. Ironically, many scholars and researchers were not intended to push on the society in the first place; instead they just follow their own interest and curiosity.哇，有点太绝对了吧，说成没有想到自己能起这么大作用什么会比较中肯。 Indeed, it is not simple to make a judgment if an invention or discovery would make contributions to society or not; in reality, researchers and scientists even cannot make sure whether they would get to success. Many discoveries were even made by accident. The discovery of penicillin can vividly exemplify this statement. Its discoverer, Flemming had no idea what the substance was in his laboratory at first. It was not until he found that such material could act as antiseptic that penicillin became widely used in the world and have saved countless lives. Same things went with the discovery of X-ray. Many occasional or fantastic researches may have profound effects on the progress of the society or the bliss of human beings. Now we may understand why Bill Gates has set up a foundation to sponsor some seemingly “ludicrous” scientific projects. 其实我也想过这两个例子，但是看虽然是因为accidental但不是因为interest就放弃了，没有对比。不过现在想起来不一定要对比。这样写也可以。 Furthermore（前面没有提到兴趣，这里却对兴趣来个furthermore，有点不连贯。）, concentrating on achieving a huge success and making contributions may constrain one's gifts or talents. It is very possible that he or she could hardly focus on his or her researches with so many desires. Sometimes a strong willingness would produce counterproductive effects. Then consequently, instead of making contributions, scientists may not reach anything but disappointment. On the contrary, if driven by their own curiosity, scholars could best exploit their brilliant gifts and fantastic imagination. Thus they could be much more effective and efficient. Interests play an indispensible role in scientific fields, which would give scientists enduring power and promote them to go further. Take one mathematician for instance. ChenJingrun who had an intensive interest in mathematics, spent days and nights in front of his table and forgot to eat or sleep, calculating, deducing, and testifying. Finally, he nearly proved the Goldbach’s conjecture（学习了） to be right. Undoubtedly, thanks for his efforts, he push the research of number theory forward. But notice, from the very beginning, he barely thought of the "fame" or "contributions" stuff; he just followed his mind and his intuition. ---我现在喜欢在段落结尾再啰嗦几句总结，显得圆溜些。你的主题段现在都写得很好了，我没什么意见了。 Nevertheless, no matter how intensive the interests are, one should stick to the principle that their curiosity should not have the potential to undermine the whole society.在兴趣的基础上进一步。不过个人觉得这个题目问的是contributions和interest的轻重，你没有可以进行比较，可以说是离题了。 Otherwise, one should immediately stop his research. Failing to have a rightful direction, more Frankensteins would emerge in the scientific fields. What if some day we suddenly encounter with someone else who identifies us and tell us that he or she is one of our cloning? What if some day time becomes vague or still and our dead grandfather stand in front of us without any warning? What if one day our Mother Earth is completely destroyed by nuclear weapons invented by ourselves and no lives survive? Surely, we do not want any of these scenarios come true. Taking into account what has been discussed above driven by their curiosity and interests, scholars and researchers can go further in their work. But in the first place, they should assess their interests to ensure them will not bring perils to the larger society. 发现我们对题目的理解总是有点偏差。

wk4aUID：2616910

19# wk4a TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable." Admirable is the firm determination to achieve one's goal regardless the difficult and arduous process, but it is never wise to unnecessarily embrace every potentially detrimental means, taking persons involved or the whole society into consideration in the long run. （简洁明白！） As for individuals, though the anticipated destiny is appealing, ignoring detrimental aspects can result in both a less favorable result and other unexpected outcomes.（文采好，观点也明了） Generally, people tend to find excuse to purge them of a charge when the goal seems to be just. It is not uncommon to find a man who does not exist to show shadowy fight（什么意思） （A shadowy flight into the dangerous world of a man who does not exist: Michael Knight— a young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.   幽灵般地驰骋在危险的世界中，讨伐罪恶势力——这就是迈克奈特,一位年轻的孤胆英雄，一位在罪犯横行、法无天的世界中，为无辜和无助的人们主持正义的勇士。  ）against the dangerous world to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless and the powerless. Thus encouragement in movies raise a false conclusion among people especially teenagers: to bring a clean society is to kill all the wicked. However, Aristotle marked two thousand years ago, "the rule of law is better than the rule of any individuals." It is dangerous to put the whole law system aside and take actions totally based on people's own judgment. Some black sheep in society may be kicked out, but the whole regulations and orders are messed up, leaving the whole society paralyzed. （恕我没明白你这段后面在分析什么啊） 不能学习以暴制暴的手段，虽然目标是维护世界和平。 More seriously, for countries, narrowly focusing on a goal and ignoring other aspects(和上段紫色部分对照下，觉得你两段在讲类似的事情)前一段讲个人，这里讲国家，额，似乎没区别？ can cause a big lost rather than achievement. Untold inter-country wars have proved this tragedy long numerous times. The Second World War, for example, which is caused by selfish desire of a few countries, put the whole world in hell. For those countries that started the two wars, agreeable are the victories that can bring much sources and lands, and significantly beneficial to their own development. However, for the rest that lost their homelands, thousands of people can be homeless and homeless let alone（终于对了！你喜欢用let alone 我喜欢用not to mention） the environment could be seriously damaged. If the goal is paid by the sacrifice of majority, it is not justifiable. Actually, every unscrupulous mean which has been put into practice is a result of both shortsighted and egoism. Some individuals or organizations that put their goals beyond everything may achieve some benefits, but such benefits are at the expense of other relatively enormous sacrifice（see，和上面那段又是很类似）其实确实没东西写了。. It is absurd to close all the factories in order to eliminate environment pollution; it is ridiculous to recall all the cars in expecting to reduce traffic accidents; it also too foolish to kill all the patients when try to control a fatal virus. One the contrary, if during the pursuit process for a goal, people carefully evaluate all the possible means and choose a multiple-win one, a virtuous circle can be enjoyed as well. Justifiable or not, the judgment of means should never narrowly based on people who take them, but on every possible influenced aspects, people, organizations and environment. The thriving of society, as a whole, is the final goal we need to pursuit. （不知道是不是脑子有点转不动了，我觉得你这三段的内容不够清晰，似乎都有相似的陈述，建议写下提纲）

这一篇脑袋没怎么想，一团糟糟

emily_feifeiUID：2626151

23# wk4a

many scholars and researchers were not intended to push on the society in the first place; instead they just follow their own interest and curiosity.哇，有点太绝对了吧，说成没有想到自己能起这么大作用什么会比较中肯。
呵呵，是过分了~

Nevertheless, no matter how intensive the interests are, one should stick to the principle that their curiosity should not have the potential to undermine the whole society.在兴趣的基础上进一步。不过个人觉得这个题目问的是contributions和interest的轻重，你没有可以进行比较，可以说是离题了。
我觉不是我们理解题目有偏差，可以说你是站在拥护contributions来指引研究的方面。
而我站在你的反面，我拥护的是interest。所以我的让步说的是不管contributions与否，只听从interest的后果。

幽灵般地驰骋在危险的世界中，讨伐罪恶势力——这就是迈克奈特,一位年轻的孤胆英雄，一位在罪犯横行、法无天的世界中，为无辜和无助的人们主持正义的勇士。
完全不知道这号人物~寡闻寡闻了~

wk4aUID：2616910

Nevertheless, no matter how intensive the interests are, one should stick to the principle that their curiosity should not have the potential to undermine the whole society.在兴趣的基础上进一步。不过个人觉得这个题目问的是contributions和interest的轻重，你没有可以进行比较，可以说是离题了。
我觉不是我们理解题目有偏差，可以说你是站在拥护contributions来指引研究的方面。
而我站在你的反面，我拥护的是interest。所以我的让步说的是不管contributions与否，只听从interest的后果。
我是比较喜欢一起比较来说。

幽灵般地驰骋在危险的世界中，讨伐罪恶势力——这就是迈克奈特,一位年轻的孤胆英雄，一位在罪犯横行、法无天的世界中，为无辜和无助的人们主持正义的勇士。
完全不知道这号人物~寡闻寡闻了~
我也是现查的