寄托天下
查看: 1101|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] Issue17 [勇往直前小组]第十一次作业 by strontium023 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
339
注册时间
2007-3-20
精华
0
帖子
3
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-7-31 13:50:49 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Just and unjust are decided by oneslef whether one is treated fairly in one's own opinion.There are thousand of Hamlet in thousand of viewers'mind,also there are thousand of just law in thousand of people's opinions.To maintain the peace of the whole society,everyone should obey the law first.Meanwhile people are able to modify the law in some efficent way.

Different people has different definition about just law,everyone should obey the law first,no matter what is just of unjust to oneself.The perfect law is never have.For example if one merchant do something to satisfy one buisness,it is possible to influence another one's right.Maybe they can't solve the problem by themselves,so they come to the court,asking for help from the law.The law has to judge the buisness as what it states about buisness.At that time,when a law is just for one person,it is highly possible unjust to another.The law is a bible in a society,the loser has to obey the law which is unjust for him/her at that time.Actually,the law is just in the whole society.Although the law is made by the ruler,it meet the mainstream ethical value of the whole society.Therefore we should study the law,do what we should do not disobey the law.

However,making a complete law is a long course.Modifying it as time passed is neccissery.If the law not meet most of the people's right or if the law isn't fit for a new period,the law should be renewd.The usual way is support the person who meet one's value to give suggestion to the uper to modify the law.If a group of people don't have a person who claim for them,they will choose a harder way like striking to strike for their own right.If the striking is not obeyed,the whole anger group may choose a serious way like start a war.For instance,the Civil War of American is broken for the law is not just for the whole black group,but the ruler wouldn't like to compromise,so a war is unvoilable.

In all,if person can't change the law,they must obey the law for responsiblility.If they have the ability to modify the law they should catch the chance to earn right about themselves.
这个暑假别样凉爽.......给自己一个全新的自己......
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
1
寄托币
945
注册时间
2007-7-3
精华
2
帖子
10
沙发
发表于 2007-8-1 12:47:15 |只看该作者
Just and unjust are decided by oneslef whether one is treated fairly in one's own opinion.There are thousand of Hamlet in thousand of viewers'mind,also there are thousand of just law in thousand of people's opinions.To maintain the peace of the whole society,everyone should obey the law first.Meanwhile people are able to modify the law in some efficent way.
(你似乎在述说不同的人对于法律的公证性的认识不同,然而个人认为,这里主要应该讨论法律公证性与人们是否违背的观点!)
Different people has different definition about just law,everyone should obey the law first,no matter what is just of unjust to oneself.The perfect law is never have.For example if one merchant do something to satisfy one buisness,it is possible to influence another one's right.Maybe they can't solve the problem by themselves,so they come to the court,asking for help from the law.The law has to judge the buisness as what it states about buisness.At that time,when a law is just for one person,it is highly possible unjust to another.The law is a bible in a society,the loser has to obey the law which is unjust for him/her at that time.Actually,the law is just in the whole society.Although the law is made by the ruler,it meet the mainstream ethical value of the whole society.Therefore we should study the law,do what we should do not disobey the law.

However,making a complete law is a long course.Modifying it as time passed is neccissery.If the law not meet most of the people's right or if the law isn't fit for a new period,the law should be renewd.The usual way is support the person who meet one's value to give suggestion to the uper to modify the law.If a group of people don't have a person who claim for them,they will choose a harder way like striking to strike for their own right.If the striking is not obeyed,the whole anger group may choose a serious way like start a war.For instance,the Civil War of American is broken for the law is not just for the whole black group,but the ruler wouldn't like to compromise,so a war is unvoilable.

In all,if person can't change the law,they must obey the law for responsiblility.If they have the ability to modify the law they should catch the chance to earn right about themselves. (整体还可以,表达能力要加强,注意文章的切合点)
ISSUE的精髓--将辩论进行到底

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-719344-1-1.html



使用道具 举报

RE: Issue17 [勇往直前小组]第十一次作业 by strontium023 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue17 [勇往直前小组]第十一次作业 by strontium023
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-713128-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部