issue137 (成都机经,一两句建议也好,回拍!)

逗逗UID：173558

173"Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways."
1在自然科学领域，创新多为用新方法重组老观点
2在艺术文学领域，创新多为独立的思考。
3在社会科学中，创新是二者的结合。

By thinking independently, we get novel ideas that have never emerged before; by rearranging creatively, we get fresh perspective of old ideas. In effect, both constructive imagination and active reorganization are essential elements of originality and play distinct roles in different fields.

In the field of natural science, almost every invention and discovery is based on previous contributions. That is, any creation in natural science depends largely on putting old ideas together in new ways. On one hand, due to the nature of continuous scientific development, every significant creation act as a foundation for later ones in its own realm. In fact, one can hardly develop a completely new theory without referring to former achievements, which have composed one’s basic knowledge and have impact on their further studies more or less. On the other hand, scientific studies are closely related with experiments, which provide chances for numerous novel trials. Actually, each attempt to rearrange the whole process, change original research methods or add other tools into experiment is the inception of originality. Thus, although rare cases arising from fully independent thinking such as emerging interdisciplinary subject do exist, originality in natural science primarily attributes to viewing old opinions form a different angle.

On the contrary, originality in art owes much to constructive imagination. Paintings, music and literature, though associated with former works to some extent, they could still develop independently. Since creative inspiration of arts always derives from individual's mental experiences or sudden intuition inside the spiritual world, they seldom built themselves on previous framework. Conversely, being confined to existent styles will ruin the essence of art. No wonder why Cubism and Impressionism emerged one after the other at the 20th century, which have little relationship with prevailing trends in the past, even opposed to those patterns. Likewise, Mark Twin create a new way of writing by exercising dialects, contradictory to mainstream formal pattern; and appearance of diverse musical styles such as Jazz and Rock always form entirely new realms. Hence, originality is more subjective in arts than in objective science and requires lots of talented imagination.

Nevertheless, the boundary of constructive imagination and active rearrangement are not so clear sometimes regardless of their forgoing distinct roles. Especially in social science, each process of creation is more likely to propose novel ideas while conserve certain old viewpoints. Typical is the recent evolution of macroeconomics, while most economists bolster the main framework and fundamental ideas of Keynes' theory, they constantly revise and supplement his theories and developed into two parts---the Cambridge school and the new classical synthesis. In their studies, neither of them has deviate from Keynesian frame, but the two have rearranged the Keynesian theory by completing it with respective original views. In this region, originality ascribes much to the combination of putting old ideas in new ways and thinking independently.

Without putting previous views from fully fresh aspects, originality will not happen in natural science; without imaging creatively and instinctively, originality will loose its real meaning in arts; without combination of the two, social science will have difficulty advancing further. In reality, originality is the creature of both independent thinking and creative rearrangement.

小玩UID：2111777

占个位子，呆会来看啊~~~

PS我又堕落了几天~~唉~~

zehuaUID：199246

By thinking independently, we get novel ideas that have（去掉that have） never emerged before; by rearranging creatively, we get fresh perspective（S？） of old ideas. In effect, both constructive imagination and active reorganization are essential elements of originality and play distinct roles in different fields.（开头不错！不象有的人，废话连篇，甚至还开始举例啦）

In the field of natural science, almost every invention and discovery is based on previous contributions. That is, any creation in natural science depends largely on putting old ideas together in new ways. On one hand, due to the nature of continuous scientific development, every significant creation act as a foundation for later ones in its own realm. In fact, one can hardly develop a completely new theory without referring to former achievements, which have composed one’s basic knowledge and have impact on their further studies more or less. On the other hand, scientific studies are closely related with experiments, which provide chances for numerous novel trials. Actually, each attempt to rearrange the whole process, change original research methods or add other tools into experiment is the inception of originality. Thus, although rare cases arising from fully independent thinking such as emerging interdisciplinary subject do exist, originality in natural science primarily attributes to viewing old opinions form a different angle.

On the contrary, originality in art owes much to constructive imagination. Paintings, music and literature, though associated with former works to some extent, they could still develop independently. Since creative inspiration of arts always derives from individual's mental experiences or sudden intuition inside the spiritual world, they seldom built themselves on previous framework. Conversely, being confined to existent styles will ruin the essence of art. No wonder why Cubism and Impressionism emerged one after the other at the 20th century, which have little relationship with prevailing trends in the past, even opposed to those patterns. Likewise, Mark Twin create a new way of writing by exercising dialects, contradictory to mainstream formal pattern; and appearance of diverse musical styles such as Jazz and Rock always form entirely new realms. Hence, originality is more subjective in arts than in objective science and requires lots of talented imagination.

Nevertheless, the boundary of constructive imagination and active rearrangement are not so clear sometimes regardless of their forgoing distinct roles. Especially in social science, each process of creation is more likely to propose novel ideas while conserve certain old viewpoints. Typical is the recent evolution of macroeconomics, while most economists bolster the main framework and fundamental ideas of Keynes' theory, they constantly revise and supplement his theories and developed into two parts---the Cambridge school and the new classical synthesis. In their studies, neither of them has deviate from Keynesian frame, but the two have rearranged the Keynesian theory by completing it with respective original views. In this region, originality ascribes much to the combination of putting old ideas in new ways and thinking independently.

Without putting previous views from fully fresh aspects, originality will not happen in natural science; without imaging creatively and instinctively, originality will loose （LOSE）its real meaning in arts; without combination of the two, social science will have difficulty advancing further. In reality, originality is the creature of both independent thinking and creative rearrangement.

感觉很不错啊！思路很清晰。找不出什么问题。:L45分钟搞完的话我觉得有6分吧？
:lol
我现在还没找到G友结伴互改。不知道你愿不愿意啊？:lol

Chloroplast923UID：207486

总分结构很清晰,给人感觉很好;
结尾处几个排比用得很好啊!
高手!

可以的话,请赐教:https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... type%26typeid%3D101

逗逗UID：173558

谢谢楼上的两位,偶还没有开始限时,问题很严重的说.
我学文的,逻辑有点混乱.望高手们赐教!

我现在还没找到G友结伴互改。不知道你愿不愿意啊？

我8月底,有时间的话相互学习

Chloroplast923UID：207486

谢谢你的宝贵意见啊!
可以再帮我看看这篇Argument吗?

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... p;page=1#pid1627735

先谢了!

小玩UID：2111777

issue137 (成都机经,一两句建议也好,回拍!)

173"Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways."
1在自然科学领域，创新多为用新方法重组老观点
2在艺术文学领域，创新多为独立的思考。
3在社会科学中，创新是二者的结合。

By thinking independently, we get novel ideas that have never emerged before; by rearranging creatively, we get fresh perspective of old ideas. In effect, both constructive imagination and active reorganization are essential elements of originality and play distinct roles in different fields.

In the field of natural science, almost every invention and discovery is based on previous contributions. That is, any creation in natural science depends largely on putting old ideas together in new ways. On one hand, due to the nature of continuous scientific development, every significant creation act as a foundation for later ones in its own realm. In fact, one can hardly develop a completely new theory without referring to former achievements, which have composed one’s basic knowledge and have impact on their further studies more or less. On the other hand, scientific studies are closely related with experiments, which provide chances for numerous novel trials. Actually, each attempt to rearrange the whole process, change original research methods or add other tools into experiment is the inception of originality. Thus, although rare cases arising from fully independent thinking such as emerging interdisciplinary subject do exist, originality in natural science primarily attributes to viewing old opinions form a different angle.
找不出来什么可P的……

On the contrary, originality in art owes much to constructive imagination. Paintings, music and literature, though associated with former works to some extent, they could still develop independently. Since creative inspiration of arts always derives from individual's mental experiences or sudden intuition inside the spiritual world, they seldom built themselves on previous framework. Conversely, being confined to existent styles will ruin the essence of art. No wonder why Cubism and Impressionism emerged one after the other at the 20th century, which have little relationship with prevailing trends in the past, even opposed to those patterns. Likewise, Mark Twin create a new way of writing by exercising dialects, contradictory to mainstream formal pattern; and appearance of diverse musical styles such as Jazz and Rock always form entirely new realms. Hence, originality is more subjective in arts than in objective science and requires lots of talented imagination.

Nevertheless, the boundary of constructive imagination and active rearrangement are not so clear sometimes regardless of their forgoing distinct roles. Especially in social science, each process of creation is more likely to propose novel ideas while conserve certain old viewpoints. Typical is the recent evolution of macroeconomics, while most economists bolster the main framework and fundamental ideas of Keynes' theory, they constantly revise and supplement his theories and developed into two parts---the Cambridge school and the new classical synthesis. In their studies, neither of them has deviate from Keynesian frame, but the two have rearranged the Keynesian theory by completing it with respective original views. In this region, originality ascribes much to the combination of putting old ideas in new ways and thinking independently.

Without putting previous views from fully fresh aspects, originality will not happen in natural science; without imaging creatively and instinctively, originality will loose its real meaning in arts; without combination of the two, social science will have difficulty advancing further. In reality, originality is the creature of both independent thinking and creative rearrangement.

我觉得无论是语言还是逻辑都很不错的啊，挑不出来什么可以P的……

如果非要挑刺的话，就是题目中说“thinking something that was never thought before”跟“thinking independently”好像还是有点差别吧，你觉得呢？似乎二者强调的重点不太一样。

其他的就只有找高手再帮你看看了，以我的水平确实觉得写得很好了：）

mvpzhuangUID：205051

组长阿，我想知道你的这些文章都是怎么选出来的，就是说为什么会选择写这些文章。我不知道应该要写哪些会比较好。

sunwuliangUID：157651

但是第三段第一句，用的ａｒｔ．．应该用ａｒｔｓ．你后面自己也都用的ａｒｔｓ勒。第四段里面ｈａｓ　ｄｅｖｉａｔｅ应该是ｈａｓ　ｄｅｖｉａｔｅｄ．．．
应该是ｒｅｌａｔｅｄ　ｔｏ．．．不是ｒｅｌａｔｅｄ　ｗｉｔｈ．．