- 最后登录
- 2011-3-27
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 241
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-18
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 189
- UID
- 2253904
![Rank: 2](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif)
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 241
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-18
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Should both parents and communities be involved in the local schools as the speaker claims, for the reason that education is so important that cannot leave to professional educators only? I concede that parents and communities should join in education, otherwise, in my view, the three should be mingled in the education and that may be better for children.
To begin with, parents and communities are playing an important role in education; they can make a better environment for studying (for children) and apply to something that children cannot be taught at school.
Firstly(on one hand), parents are the first teacher for children who will mimic the behavior of their parents. For example, the only way for parents to impart morality to children is to do it themselves, and their children will do the same thing follow(ing) the parents. Besides, parents is the people who are most caring about their children and who knows the children best; that is to say, parents may understand what their children excel and what are(去掉) the children want best. And in this realm, parents may make more specific choice for their children ,just like choosing painting rather than singing, will be better because the child is like(enjoy) painting more, which may not be achieved at school. In a word, parents are so important in educating children as their first teacher.
Secondly(On the other hand/side), communities are also crucial in the education beside(s) parents. Children will enter the society after their education, and communities can provide a good chance for children to realize the society basically. Nowadays, many students practice in some enterprises and this experience which cannot be learnt at school may help them to suit the society and to find a better job after school. On the other hand, education at school may develop better with the patron of the communities such as better devises for teaching. So communities may help the education at school for teaching something that can only be learnt in society.
However, education taken by parents and communities cannot take place of education at school. There are also many flaws in this education. For example, parents may mollycoddle their children and over protect them which make children lack of experience and be ill-mannered. And so does the communities, which may focus on talent children too often and affect the study of them. From this point of view, parents and communities should join the education modestly, and should not affect the education at school .
Moreover, education at school is also an important part which cannot be overlooked. Professional educator has affluent experience in teaching and the method they used(use) may be more professional than parents which make the education more systematically. What's more, the teaching conditions at school are better than that at home. Apt example include libraries at school which can got information more quickly and efficiently which may not provided by the parents or communities. In short, professional educators may do more excellent in teaching children and make better character and more socialize for them than parents who with no experience in educating, so education taken by professional educators cannot be put to the second superiority and be overlooked.
To sum up, professional educator, parents and communities are intermingled in the education for children; in other words, the three has the superiority respect, and the mingle of them could give(s) the best education for our children.
思路大家大体都一样 只是语言上稍有不足 加油限时 次数自然多了就好了! |
|