Issue38 【加州阳光】第二次作业 请猛拍~~

kejia0422UID: 170864

第二次作业
issue38
学习类高频  机井频率31
In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
电视时代的读书已经不像以前那么重要了。人们通过看电视学到的和他们读书所能学到的一样多。

现代技术之电视和读书:)

不赞同，
1。MEDIA的利益追求性。在现在社会，电视作为主要媒体是被利益追求控制的，不可能真正的做教育
2．电视教育本生的缺陷让观众没有学习的主动权。
3。就其降要传播的内容而言，电视具有其局限性。多少年来伟大的思想和情感由文字的方式传递下来，这是作者直接的细想体现，而以另一种表现形式取传达就需要中间人的工作，而这是难以达到原来的精妙的。就好像翻译，总是很难完整，和谐的体现原作的意思一样。
3。然而电视也有他好处，传播快捷，覆盖面广，价钱相对 便宜，都是优点

Because of the increasing effect of television exert in our lives, the speaker asserts that people can learn as much knowledge by watching television as reading books taking account of the decrease of importance of reading in the age of television. However, as for me, I would contend that regardless of the increasing role television in our society, the importance of reading books can't be replaced, which can be substantiated by the following discussions.
One reason for my disagreement with the speaker is that television is not an ideal educational tool in this society honoring economic pursuits. Common sense tells us that as a twist of manipulating pubic concerns, public media, television especially, has become a profitable market resource in which every entrepreneur striving to participate for their own interests. In this way, the earthly world, has fundamentally modeled these information-transferring approaches into a money-earning machinery instead of being a favorable way to widely spread knowledge resorting to its own advantages such as convenience, cheap, huge cover. Just as it is in television, large amount of ads flooding around, recreational programs backed up by various groups still trying hard to attract more attention, and the only existent didactic programs are on the edge of disappearance for lower investment and less showing time. The real facts convince me that television can not be a good way to teach.
What is also noticing is that the TV programs have inherent defects of initiative because its one-way decided arrangement. As we all know, timing, repeating, selection of contexts, which can be easily obtained in the traditional approach of reading, are some of the elements of effective education, but the inborn destitute of these convenience in TV largely debilitate the flexibility of the learning process. And it is also widely known that preparation, noting and review, use to be amply implemented in reading, are the essential parts in learning process, but without a real resources which are performed in video on TV, students can not carry out these learning methods to consolidate the impression of knowledge.
Lending further credibility to this topic, it comes to the extent of ideological contents the videos could take from the headstream, via the work of the producer of TV program. Great philosophers, ideologists and writers record their resplendent thoughts in paper in order to be spread by the way of reading. However a television program containing these thoughts would firstly be understand by the producer and then remake it with the help of many assistants. The mental differences between the originator with the producer and co-producers determine the gap in the transforming the appearance of ideology. And when the gap come to face of audience, learning effect would be inextricably enervated. Proper example can be see in the work of interpreters and film makers reappearing the great writers' works through their artistic thoughts.
Notwithstanding the disadvantages of television education discussed above, the merits of this newly born teaching method which can not be seen in reading process could not be ignored: the information can be disseminated fast by the way of television, it covers most of the earth, compared with books it is much cheaper with regard of the same volume of information.
In sum, I am convinced that television can not equate the effect of books, not only because this new approach is born in a profit-persuing society, but also in the cause of its inherent deficiency of one-way arrangement as well as the ideological gap while transformation. Contrarily, taking account of its advantages, television would play a significant role in the future if the ethos and mentality of our era rise to a perfect level.

[ 本帖最后由 kejia0422 于 2006-6-9 19:45 编辑 ]

lastpearlUID: 2119955

issue38
学习类高频  机井频率31
In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
电视时代的读书已经不像以前那么重要了。人们通过看电视学到的和他们读书所能学到的一样多。

现代技术之电视和读书

不赞同，
1。MEDIA的利益追求性。在现在社会，电视作为主要媒体是被利益追求控制的，不可能真正的做教育
2．电视教育本生的缺陷让观众没有学习的主动权。
3。就其降要传播的内容而言，电视具有其局限性。多少年来伟大的思想和情感由文字的方式传递下来，这是作者直接的细想体现，而以另一种表现形式取传达就需要中间人的工作，而这是难以达到原来的精妙的。就好像翻译，总是很难完整，和谐的体现原作的意思一样。
3。然而电视也有他好处，传播快捷，覆盖面广，价钱相对 便宜，都是优点

Because of the increasing effect of television exert in our lives, the speaker asserts that people can learn as much knowledge by watching television as reading books taking account of the decrease of importance of reading in the age of television. However, as for me, I would contend that regardless of the increasing role television in our society, the importance of reading books can't (cannot) be replaced, which can be substantiated by the following discussions.
One reason for my disagreement with the speaker is that television is not an ideal educational tool in this society honoring economic pursuits. Common sense tells us that as a twist of manipulating pubic concerns, public media, television especially (especially television), has become a profitable market resource in which every entrepreneur striving to participate for their own interests. In this way, the earthly world, has fundamentally modeled these information-transferring approaches into a money-earning machinery instead of being a favorable way to widely spread knowledge resorting to its own advantages such as convenience, cheap, huge cover. Just as it is in television, large amount of ads flooding around, recreational programs backed up by various groups still trying hard to attract more attention, and the only existent didactic programs are on the edge of disappearance for lower investment and less showing time. The real facts convince me that television can not be a good way to teach.
What is also noticing (noteworthy值得注意的) is that the TV programs have inherent defects of initiative because its one-way decided arrangement. As we all know, timing, repeating, selection of contexts, which can be easily obtained in the traditional approach of reading, are some of the elements of effective education, but the inborn destitute of these convenience in TV largely debilitate the flexibility of the learning process. And it is also widely known that preparation, noting and review, use to be amply implemented in reading, are the essential parts in learning process, but without a real resources which are performed in video on TV, students can not carry out these learning methods to consolidate the impression of knowledge.
Lending further credibility to this topic, it comes to the extent of ideological contents the videos could take from the headstream, via the work of the producer of TV program. Great philosophers, ideologists and writers record their resplendent thoughts in paper in order to be spread by the way of reading. However a television program containing these thoughts would firstly be understand by the producer and then remake it with the help of many assistants. The mental differences between the originator with the producer and co-producers determine the gap in the transforming the appearance of ideology. And when the gap come to face of audience, learning effect would be inextricably enervated. Proper example can be see（seen） in the work of interpreters and film makers reappearing the great writers' works through their artistic thoughts.
Notwithstanding the disadvantages of television education discussed above, the merits of this newly born teaching method which can not be seen in reading process could not be ignored: the information can be disseminated fast by the way of television, it covers most of the earth, compared with books it is much cheaper with regard of （不太合适）the same volume of information.
In sum, I am convinced that television can not equate the effect of books, not only because this new approach is born in a profit-persuing (profit-pursuing) society, but also in the cause of its inherent deficiency of one-way arrangement as well as the ideological gap while transformation. Contrarily, taking account of its advantages, television would play a significant role in the future if the ethos and mentality of our era rise to a perfect level.

写的不错，值得学习，很多词汇我写作的时候一般都没用上，向你学习

[ 本帖最后由 lastpearl 于 2006-6-11 14:12 编辑 ]

kejia0422UID: 170864

谢谢珠珠的意见，今天重新看了下这片文章，边看边流汗，。。
修改：
Because of the increasing effect of television exert in our lives, the speaker asserts that people can learn as much knowledge by watching television as reading books taking account of the decrease of importance of reading in the age of television. However, as for me, I would contend that regardless of the increasing role television in our society, the importance of reading books can't be replaced, which can be substantiated by the following discussions.
One reason for my disagreement with the speaker is that television is not an ideal educational tool in this society honoring profits. Common sense tells us that as a wrist of manipulating pubic concerns, public media, television especially, has become a profitable market in which every entrepreneur striving to participate for their own interests. In this way, our earthly world fundamentally models these information-transferring approaches into a money-earning machinery instead of a favorable way to spread knowledge resorting to its own advantages such as convenience, cheap, huge cover. Just as it is in television, large amount of ads flooding around, recreational programs backed up by various groups trying hard to attract more attention, and the only existent didactic programs are on the edge of disappearance for lower investment and less showing time. Real facts convince me that television can not be a good way to teach.
What is also noticing is that the inherent defects of TV programs in its one-way decided arrangement. As we all know, timing, repeating, selection of contexts, which can be easily obtained in the traditional approach of reading, are some of the core elements of effective education, but the inborn destitute of these convenience in TV largely debilitate the flexibility of the learning process. And it is also widely known that preparation, noting and review, use to be amply implemented in reading, are the essential parts in learning process, but without the untouchable resources performed on TV, students can not carry out these learning methods to consolidate the impression of knowledge.
Lending further credibility to this topic, it comes to the extent of ideological contents the videos could take from the headstream, via the work of the producers of TV programs. Great philosophers, ideologists and writers record their resplendent thoughts in paper in order to be spread by the way of reading. However, a television program aiming at diffusing these thoughts would firstly be understood by the director and then remade with the help of many assistants. The mental differences between the originator and the directors as well as co-producers determine the gap in the transforming the appearance of ideologies. And when the gap comes to audience, it would be further enhanced and learning effect would be inextricably emaciated. Proper example can be see in the work of interpreters and film makers reappearing the great writers' works, but different types of criticism can be seen concerning about the poor appearance of initiative artistic tastes.
Notwithstanding the disadvantages of television education discussed above, the merits of this newly born teaching method should not be ignored: the information can be disseminated fast by the way of television webs, it covers the most part of this world, compared with books it is much cheaper with regard of the same volume of information and so forth. Thus television could also be a effective approach of teaching, when people are too young to understand words, when the books are to get, when the knowledge is more effectively transmit by experience other than literately taught just like basketball playing and car racing.
In sum, I am convinced that television can not equate the effect of books, not only because this new approach is born in a profit-persuing society, but also in the cause of its inherent deficiency of one-way arrangement as well as the ideological gap while transformation. Contrarily, taking account of its advantages, television would play a significant role in the future if the ethos and mentality of our era rise to a perfect level.