寄托天下
查看: 941|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[活动] 【12月-1月IBT综合备考活动】之【TWE写作】12-23 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
251
注册时间
2008-12-2
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-12-23 21:19:35 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

In the university, the score almost become the standard to estimate one's ability. When students construct a team to accomplish the project, here comes a debate on whether they should get the same score at the end. Some people claim that the members in the same team should get the same sore for they cooperate with each other. Whereas, others including me, maintain that teacher should give the different scores to each of them because their contribution to the project is inequality.

Firstly, in the progress of accomplishing project through the style of team work, each member does different part of the project base on their ability. Due to the dissimilar advantage, members usually choose to do the part that they are good at.  For example, some people are adept at mastermind the project, at the beginning of it, they are busy in collecting information, thinking the main item, organizing the ideas from others, while others only help them a little. And then they have to write out the detail plan, arrange the members at the same time. We can't deny that they play an important role on the entire project. Hardly can we accomplish the project well without them. As a consquence, team members should get different scouse base on theri contribution to the project.

Secondly, some members may be lazy during the progress because of the same score in the end. We have to admit that almost everyone has slothful attitude to the study. Every member in the team may consider that there must be some studious members do the work, only thing they can do is to wait the same score in the end. As a consequence, students in team may not try their best to accomplish the project and indulge themselves to play. With the time going, the ability to study may decline and what they get in the university is nothing. So teachers should utilize different scores to stimulate members in the team to do the project.

In a word, giving team members the same score does harm to the students' ability in studying. Scores should be based on the different contribution to the project, so that students express interests in the project and accomplish well.



[ 本帖最后由 xiaojing1115 于 2008-12-23 21:20 编辑 ]
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
247
注册时间
2008-9-19
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2008-12-24 18:32:10 |只看该作者
楼主写的很好,观点明确,分两段写,例子也很恰当。语句运用也比较娴熟,是我值得学习的。
希望楼主以后在单词拼写等一些小错误上再加强一下,减少无谓失误。 呵呵

我个人的看法而已。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
324
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2008-12-24 18:39:36 |只看该作者

In the university, the score almost become the standard to estimate one's ability. When students construct a team to accomplish the project, here comes a debate on whether they should get the same score at the end. Some people claim that the members in the same team should get the same sore (score) for they cooperate with each other. Whereas, others including me, maintain that teacher should give the different scores to each of them because their contributions to the project is (are) inequality.

Firstly, in the progress of accomplishing project through the style of team work, each member does different part of the project base on their ability. Due to the dissimilar advantage, members usually choose to do the part that they are good at.  For example, some people are adept at mastermind the project, at the beginning of it, they are busy in collecting information, thinking the main item, organizing the ideas from others, while others only help them a little. And then they have to write out the detail plan, arrange the members at the same time. We can't deny that they play an important role on the entire project. Hardly can we accomplish the project well without them. As a consquence, team members should get different scouse base on theri contribution to the project.

Secondly, some members may be lazy during the progress because of the same score in the end. We have to admit that almost everyone has slothful attitude to the study. Every member in the team may consider that there must be some studious members do the work, only thing they can do is to wait the same score in the end. As a consequence, students in team may not try their best to accomplish the project and indulge themselves to play. With the time going, the ability to study may decline and what they get in the university is nothing. So teachers should utilize different scores to stimulate members in the team to do the project.

In a word, giving team members the same score does harm to the students' ability in studying. Scores should be based on the different contribution to the project, so that students express interests in the project and accomplish well.

中间论证三段就更好了,中间第二段论证很好。语言再变换些就更好了。

使用道具 举报

RE: 【12月-1月IBT综合备考活动】之【TWE写作】12-23 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
【12月-1月IBT综合备考活动】之【TWE写作】12-23
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-904538-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部