argument185【0906G ANap Hand 作文互改小组】第5次作业 BY doherty

stupidken2oUID: 2541049

这些天考试只写了提纲
185The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager.

"One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately 1/3 of its original force. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. Clearly, restricting water flow throughout all the 20 floors of Sunnyside Towers will increase our profits further."

1.        水流量改成了原来的1/3并不就意味着相当可观的节约
2.        水压的减少，除了一些抱怨声外，或许还有很多的其他问题，比如火宅安全隐患
3.        前5层的减压对整栋公寓进行限制水压并不一定适用，楼层高本来水压就小，可能使高层水供应不上去，而且可能造成大面积的怨言，以至于遭受投诉，索赔，又何谈利润呢？