Argument51【0906G 文以载道三月四月作文小组】第2周第1作业 on ph粉丝

1shiaiwodeUID: 2484260

The result of the study based on the two incomparable groups that all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment is failed the support the hypothesis that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. A careful examination of the argument in the following will reveal how unwarranted the study is.
   First of all, the conductors in the two groups are not the same. The two different doctors who treated a group each（the two different groups） may influence the result. The first doctor is specialized in sports medicine, while the second is a general physician. The skills of the two doctors may determine the prognosis of the patients.  That's to say, the first doctor who is specialized in sports medicine may be more skillful to treat muscle strain. So the recuperation time of the first group is 40 percent quicker may be result from the techniques of the doctors, not the antibiotics.

Second, the situations of two groups in the study are uncertain. Whether the two groups have the equal amount patients?  Whether the degrees of their injuries are similar? Whether the circumstances where they are having their treatments are the same?  May the first group is less serious than the second. All of the things above are not clear. Without excluding a lot of other factors that may influence the results, we can’t agree with the arguer.

  Third, the argument lacks details of the treatments. Other therapies may be existed as well as the antibiotics. In the first group treated by Dr Newland of whichthe patients (which Dr Newland) took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment may be undertaken other therapies like rehabilitations trainings, physical therapies or taking other medicines at the same time. Also, in the second group, patients treated by Dr. Alton may be given sugar pills without any other therapies. If so, the effects of the two groups will definitely different. As a result, more descriptions and explanations of the treatments of the two groups should be demonstrated.

  In a word, the result of the study based on two incomparable groups is insignificant and is unable to support the hypothesis. Advanced researches and studies are needed.

我的水平只能改到这个地步了...你的文中只是有点小错误，其他的都不错的~


[ 本帖最后由 1shiaiwode 于 2009-1-19 15:47 编辑 ]